I yield myself as much time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, as a member of the Diabetes Caucus and throughout most of the 1990s, I was a member of our regional diabetes board for the ADA. In fact, I call myself a perpetual vice chairman of…
I yield myself as much time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, as a member of the Diabetes Caucus and throughout most of the 1990s, I was a member of our regional diabetes board for the ADA. In fact, I call myself a perpetual vice chairman of our region. So it is with great pride that I am here in support and that I encourage my colleagues to support H. Res. 35.
I want to recognize the 23.6 million Americans who suffer from diabetes. Diabetes can lead to serious complications and premature death, but people with diabetes can take steps to control the disease and to lower their risks of complications.
The Centers for Disease Control has stated that the progression of diabetes among those with prediabetes is not inevitable, and studies have shown that people with prediabetes who lose weight and who increase their physical activity can prevent or delay diabetes and can return their blood pressure to near normal. Through regular exercise and a steady diet, Americans can return to a healthier state of living and can avoid diabetes.
Because diabetes affects individuals in different ways, it is important that we educate our communities about the causes and about effective ways to avoid diabetes through living a healthy lifestyle. Additionally, we must continue to research the causes, treatment, education, and eventual cure for diabetes through public and private partnerships.
I do believe that the 1,000-page health reform bill, which was rushed through the House of Representatives by the other side of the aisle to establish a government takeover of health care, will negatively impact those with diabetes and will severely curtail our ability to find a cure. I fail to see how a massive government takeover of our health care system and how the creation of scores of new bureaucracies will revitalize our economy or will give Americans better care.
Instead, the House Tri-Committee bill would ration health care like it is done in the U.K. and Canada. This rationing of health care will not be better for the patients. It will lead to many diabetics in need of dialysis and care who will be turned away or who will have longer wait times when they need access to physicians.
In addition to nearly a $1 trillion health reform bill which was pushed on the American public, the recent stimulus legislation provided an extra $10 billion of funding to the NIH for the advancement of scientific research. Unfortunately, long-held processes on the length and structure of trials have been ignored in order to spend the funds as quickly as possible and in as many Congressional districts as possible.
Instead of rushing to spend billions of dollars for a political photo op, it would have been more responsible, both scientifically and fiscally, to continue to have the NIH determine what trials' processes deserve the most merit. If we hadn't rushed to spend in the name of ``stimulus,'' I believe that some of the $10 billion could have been used for research into type 1 diabetes.
I want to see Americans recognizing the significance of monitoring their
own and members of their families' health in getting the proper and timely treatment for diabetes. I would also like to see, through public-private partnerships, a continued commitment to diabetes research so that, one day, we may have a cure.
I would like to thank the sponsor of this bill, Representative Gene Green from Texas, for his work on this resolution. I stand, once again, in support of this legislation, and I hope my colleagues will join me.
I reserve the balance of my time.
I yield myself as much time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, as I mentioned, from my activities in the Diabetes Caucus, I have learned that, as I stated in the main statement, that education, nutrition, and exercise leads to prevention of much of type 1 and type 2. Today is the sixth anniversary of the Medicare and Medicaid Reform Act that was passed in 2003 on a nearly partisan vote. It was then that we recognized that the Republicans, who authored that bill, supported that bill and that actually this is the first time that Medicare would pay for education, nutrition counseling.
I thought it was very odd that under Medicare for a diabetic, that Medicare would pay for an amputation or kidney dialysis, but it wouldn't pay $150 to prevent those from happening by way of education, diabetic education classes, which included nutrition and exercise and such. We have come a long way in recognizing prevention.
Certainly we don't need the government, through its history of not wanting to cover preventive care--I think we could do a better job within the private side or free enterprise side. We don't need government running health care to make sure that people that are in need of diabetes education, nutrition, a dietician, exercise, counseling, could receive that.
I again want to thank Gene Green for bringing this much-needed resolution. Once again, I rise in support of this resolution.
I have no further speakers, and I yield back the balance of my time.