Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the rule and the underlying bill. I originally had some things written down on paper, but based on the last comments, I just want to echo the sentiments of my colleague and also share that I served as…
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the rule and the underlying bill. I originally had some things written down on paper, but based on the last comments, I just want to echo the sentiments of my colleague and also share that I served as Secretary of Labor in the State of Delaware. I served as head of State personnel.
Jobs are important to us. I had the opportunity to work on WIA, WIOA, all of those great pieces of legislation for workforce development. And I want to talk about some myths.
There is a myth that the majority of people on SNAP aren't working or won't work in a year. That is a myth. Two-thirds of SNAP recipients are children, seniors, and people with disabilities. People don't realize that. And there are 6 million unfilled jobs. So, for me, the problem with this bill, the biggest problem is that it was a missed opportunity.
If we are truly serious about employing people who are returning from prison, people who maybe have a disability--
Mr. Speaker, if we are truly serious, then we will come to the table. But when the table is set in stone, then we don't get an opportunity to really work on those things that will support the American people.
The other piece that was disappointing to me is, I came to this as a person who wanted to be on this committee because of its bipartisan nature and that the American people are waiting and watching to see us come together for them. This is a loss of confidence, and it is also a missed opportunity.
I am excited and hopeful that we will come together because the people are watching.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record a letter that I wrote to Secretary Perdue, because there were a lot of questions and assumptions that were never answered even in our markup.
Congress of the United States,
House of Representatives,
Washington, DC, May 11, 2018.
Hon. Sonny Perdue,
Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Washington, DC.
Dear Secretary Perdue: I am writing to request that the
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) respond to my inquiries
regarding H.R. 2, the Agriculture and Nutrition Act of 2018,
which is also known as the Farm Bill. As a member of the
House Committee on Agriculture, I am one of 46 Members
sitting on the committee of jurisdiction for this
legislation. Given the breadth of the proposed changes in the
Farm Bill, I want to take this opportunity to reach out to
the agency that will be responsible for implementing the
provisions in the bill.
During the markup of the Farm Bill on April 18, 2018, my
colleagues on both sides of the aisle were only able to
direct questions to Chairman Conaway. However, I believe it
is essential that we hear from the experts involved in
running these programs to ensure we are advocating for
policies that are evidence-based. As a result, I respectfully
ask that you address the following questions and provide a
timely response.
Workforce Programs
My understanding is that we would need anywhere between
three to five million more slots in workforce training
programs across the country if all eligible SNAP participants
would like to enroll in SNAP Employment and Training (E&T)
programs. The bill would provide a new federal E&T grant of
$1 billion per year to finance the newly mandated work
program, which comes out to less than $30 per person per
month. Upon what evidence and or best practices has this
number been arrived at? Does the USDA believe this is
sufficient? If not, what does the USDA think is sufficient to
implement a meaningful workforce development program and move
people into work?
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis says it
would take a decade to set up a program for everyone to get a
work slot. If state E&T costs are greater than their annual
federal grant, will states bear the additional costs
associated with operating the work programs? What breakdown
does USDA expect in administration expenses between job
training, IT, administrative costs, and other programs? What
are the ramifications for states of not fully implementing
their work programs?
What additional capacity would USDA require to oversee this
new work program? Would states experience increased
administrative costs under this proposal?
When specifically will we hear the results from the 2014
Farm Bill SNAP E&T Pilot Projects? Under current law, what
are your expectations for sharing these findings and building
them into USDA oversight of state E&T? If H.R. 2 were to be
enacted as proposed, when will you be able to incorporate the
findings from the pilot projects into the SNAP program, based
on how this bill is written?
I appreciate your timely consideration and the work you do
for farmers, families, and communities across the country.
Sincerely,
Lisa Blunt Rochester,
Committee Member,
House Committee on Agriculture.