Motion To Instruct Conferees On H.R. 2419, Food And Energy Security Act Of 2007
Mr. Speaker, I too want to recognize Chairman Peterson and Speaker Pelosi for the hard work and the dedication that they have exhibited as they have pursued this farm bill and the great job that they have done and continue to do to get us…
Mr. Speaker, I too want to recognize Chairman Peterson and Speaker Pelosi for the hard work and the dedication that they have exhibited as they have pursued this farm bill and the great job that they have done and continue to do to get us a farm bill.
As I listened to these discussions, and I have heard them year after year, we go through this when we do the appropriations, we always have those that consider that they are more knowledgeable than the people that are actually in the business and have to make these businesses work and make them profitable. They know more about how to make this happen than the people that really do make it happen.
One thing that we know, the only reason for a farm bill and a farm bill is to guarantee adequate production and processing capacity so that our people have a reasonably priced food and fiber supply.
In a global marketplace, and we are certainly in a global marketplace in agriculture today, every country that has food security has a stronger farm bill than we do.
They have a better safety net than we do in this country.
We absolutely know, just like the chairman said, these prices come up and they go down. Right now the price that you can see on the Chicago Board of Trade is in some cases 25 percent higher than a farmer can actually receive. And even then the prices that are available to them aren't too bad.
But as the gentleman from Texas recognized, production costs, when some of these numbers were put in this bill or in the other bills that we have had, diesel fuel was 30 cents a gallon. It is $4 a gallon today, or over $4. You can say that about all of the production costs that a farmer has to face. The cost of machinery has gone up a great deal in the last couple of years. All of these things are necessary to have efficient production of food and fiber in this country. The same thing can be said about a farm bill. Without a farm bill as a safety net, this system cannot continue to function. And I offer as evidence that it has functioned successfully for a long time, that the American people feed themselves for a lot less of their disposable income than people in any other country in the world.
Now you can't pick up a newspaper today or hear a broadcast news story for very long that doesn't talk about the high price of food. If you really want to see some catastrophic prices, just keep doing what these guys have tried to do over and over, year after year and continue to chip away at this safety net.
Like the chairman said, I believe, or maybe it was the gentleman from Texas, they want the government to decide how big your farm can be. They don't even want you to be able to decide that I will farm part of it, my son will farm part of it. They want to use every tool that there is to try to mix that up and make it less efficient.
In the South, in rice and cotton country, 2,000 acres is no longer a viable economic unit. You cannot be prepared to put in a crop on 2,000 acres with a million dollars worth of machinery and another nearly million dollars worth of fuel and fertilizer and seed and chemicals. And there are those who don't think you ought to use fertilizer, and there are those who don't think you ought to use chemicals. But if you do those things, just be ready to produce whatever you are going to eat and your family is going to eat in your own backyard because we are not going to have the efficient production machine that we have in this country today that farm bills have made possible.
And these people may have huge dollars invested, but they don't make huge profits. This is a very dangerous thing. We all know the damage that
high fuel costs and high energy costs are bringing to our economy today. That is going to be an insignificant event when we lose the ability to be the most efficient producers of food and fiber that has ever existed in the history of the world.
The American farmer doesn't have to take a second place to anybody in their ability to feed our people. They do it. It is the hardest work in the world. All they ask is a fair chance. All they ask is enough safety net so that they can get a loan from the bank and continue to do what they love to do and what they are really, really good at.
We should be doing more to allow these wonderful entrepreneurs to do what they have to do to be successful and to produce food that is inexpensive enough for us to buy it. There is no shortage of food in the United States of America today. But what these proposals will do is create a shortage that you can't fix. It will create a situation that you cannot take care of in any kind of a short time frame. You just get one crop a year.
So I would ask this Congress, and I would ask the gentlemen, I know they have good intentions, unfortunately they have got bad ideas. This is something that we should not gamble with. We have got a system that we know works. I think it is inadequate, but at least give us this so that our producers can have the ability to continue to be successful.
I once again thank the chairman for all of his hard work.