HELPING FAMILIES SAVE THEIR HOMES ACT OF 2009--Continued
Mr. President, I commend Senators Reed and Bond for bringing up the HEARTH Act in the form of their amendment, and for all the commitment they have shown to addressing homelessness in our Nation. While this amendment seeks to protect the…
Mr. President, I commend Senators Reed and Bond for bringing up the HEARTH Act in the form of their amendment, and for all the commitment they have shown to addressing homelessness in our Nation. While this amendment seeks to protect the homeless by expanding the definition of homelessness used by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, HUD, to a certain degree, it also places many unfortunate limitations on people living in several circumstances common to those who find themselves or their families temporarily without permanent lodging.
For instance, the definition proposed by my colleagues, Senators Reed and Bond, would seem to exclude those who are sharing the housing of others due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or similar reasons, and those who are staying in motels due to the lack of adequate alternative accommodations. It would include people staying in motels if they only have enough money to stay for 14 days, and people in doubled-up situations only if there is ``credible evidence'' that the owner/renter of the housing will not then stay for more than 14 days. More troubling is the fact that children, youth, and families who meet other federal definitions of homelessness are included in the HUD definition only if they have been without permanent housing for a long period of time, and have moved frequently over that time, and can be expected to stay without permanent housing due to numerous barriers.
Over 70 percent of the homeless children and youth identified by public schools across the country last year--more than 500,000 students--were doubled-up or in motels, and therefore ineligible for HUD Homeless Assistance. In my home State of Alaska, the Anchorage School District, the largest in our State, has seen a quantum leap this school year in one category for which no school superintendent or resident can be proud: The number of school children in this State of being ``doubled-up'' numbers have increased 100 percent over last school year. Don't think for a moment that doubled-up families have more stable housing than those in shelters. Doubled-up families change locations 3-12 times in the course of a school year. Families are in shelters generally for 30-90 days.
The Reed-Bond amendment would have the unfortunate effect of continuing to exclude most of these children and youth from HUD services and attention. The failure of the HUD definition to include these families and youth compounds educational problems and makes the task of providing a stable education much more difficult. I hope we can continue to work on this issue to ensure that HUD adopts a definition of homelessness that matches the reality of homelessness among families and youth, and is similar to definitions used by the U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the U.S. Department of Justice.