Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, this is an en bloc that was put together in close consultation with the minority. I urge all Members to support it, and I reserve the balance of my time. Madam…
Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Madam Speaker, this is an en bloc that was put together in close consultation with the minority. I urge all Members to support it, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Chabot).
Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Pfluger), one of our outstanding freshmen.
Madam Speaker, I have some more speakers who aren't ready to speak right now, so at this time I reserve the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Florida (Mrs. Cammack), who is another outstanding freshman Member.
Madam Speaker, I urge support of the amendments en bloc, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 30 seconds.
I fully support our law enforcement community, and particularly those in small and rural communities like those that pepper my entire congressional district. Those are the ones that benefit the most from the 1033 program.
Limiting military equipment transfers would significantly impede their ability to do their jobs to keep us safe. We need to be supporting our law enforcement community, not making their missions more difficult.
For that reason I oppose this amendment and urge a ``no'' vote, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. C. Scott Franklin), my friend and colleague, and a great member of the Armed Services Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Rutherford), my good friend and a former sheriff.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Nehls), another outstanding freshman.
Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this amendment.
Mr. Speaker, I want people to understand what the gentleman is proposing because it is naive and reckless.
When we get the budget proposal from the administration, it is just that. It is a proposal. But it is also from the executive branch. It is not coming directly from the combatant commanders, who are the individuals that we charge with the responsibility for executing the U.S. missions around the world.
This amendment would prohibit them giving us the items that were not funded by the President's budget proposal. Keep in mind, both this President and the last President have given us budget proposals that were grossly inadequate. We were able to remedy it under the last President; we were able to remedy it in this one with this President. And we depend heavily on what the combatant commanders tell us they need.
It is critical that Congress knows what the commanders need to keep our servicemembers safe and ensure the success of their missions.
Here is an example. In the fiscal year 2022 unfunded priority, the CENTCOM commander sent us a $106 million request to operate and maintain the Patriot batteries deployed in Iraq to keep our troops safe from missiles fired from Iran and the proxies in Syria.
That money was not in the Biden budget. We found out about it and funded it because of that critical need, and it is now in the bill because General McKenzie told us about it in his unfunded requirement list. We wouldn't have known about that otherwise. That is just one example of why this amendment is misguided.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all Members to oppose it, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I know the gentleman means well, but I am not misguided, and I don't misunderstand anything.
I know exactly what the unfunded requirements request list is, it is a vital piece of information for our committee to do its oversight, and I urge the Members of this body to reject this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, this is a terrible and reckless amendment, and I urge all the Members of this body to reject it, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Speaker, this amendment will strip $79 billion out of the bill. That would have catastrophic effects on our training and readiness.
I need to remind Members, we have been at war for two decades, we have worn out everything we have got. We have got to start replacing and modernizing for the future to be able to take on the threats from China and other adversaries. This will set us back on clean-up and environmental remediation of PFAS and other contaminated items.
It would put off construction of new military housing, schools, and childcare facilities, and the list goes on.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all Members to oppose this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, this bill does everything the gentlewoman just talked about. We are investing in those items that she has talked about, and we are divesting ourselves of those $78 billion worth of legacy platforms that will not be useful in the future, and we are applying that money toward future platforms.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to gentleman from Tennessee (Mr. DesJarlais), my friend and colleague, and an outstanding member of the Armed Services Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I would point out that achieving or meeting the objectives that the gentlewoman just outlined and defense are not mutually exclusive, we can do both and should do both.
And I would point out that the $3.5 trillion that the other side is proposing doesn't spend a dime on defense. Also, we are in the process of auditing. The gentlewoman is exactly right, the Defense Department has never passed an audit. This bill continues the pressure on them to get that complete. We have had many agencies that passed, not all have, and we are not going to let up until they pass an audit.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Gallagher), the ranking member of the Military Personnel Subcommittee and the Armed Services Committee, and an outstanding leader.
Mr. Speaker, this amendment guts our bill which is, I am certain, the gentlewoman's intention. It is recklessly irresponsible. It would harm our servicemembers and their families.
Mr. Speaker, I strongly urge all Members to oppose it, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
Mr. Speaker, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 2 minutes.
Mr. Speaker, here we go again. This time they are stripping $25 billion in funding added by Republicans and Democrats on the committee.
The gentlewoman argues that the Biden budget is sufficient for our national defense. I strongly disagree. The Biden budget constitutes a cut of about $4 billion in real spending from last year. The budget cuts the number of Navy ships. It cuts the number of Navy ships and destabilizes the industrial base. It slashes procurement across the board. It guts missile defense. It leaves unfunded $25 billion in combatant commander priorities, and it cuts the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines. At least they left the Space Corps alone.
It does all this while our adversaries, especially China, are investing in military modernization. China increased its defense spending by 75 percent over the last decade--6 percent this year alone. They are leapfrogging this into capabilities like AI and hypersonics, and they are stepping up malign operations against America and our allies.
What is the President's response to this?
He responds with a budget that would cut funding programs that we need to deter China. It doesn't make sense, especially when he is proposing to swell nondefense spending by a massive 16 percent this year. This bill corrects that.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all Members to oppose this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Wittman), who is a real leader on the Armed Services Committee and ranking member on the Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from the great State of Alabama (Mr. Carl), who is one of our outstanding freshmen on the Armed Services Committee.
Mr. Speaker, the underlying bill before this body, the FY22 National Defense Authorization Act, would increase spending by 3 percent over inflation, which is a modest increase. And it passed our committee with an overwhelming bipartisan vote.
This amendment guts the bill. I urge all Members to oppose it, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, this en bloc package was put together in close consultation with the minority. I urge all Members to support it.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gohmert), my longtime friend and colleague.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Jackson), an outstanding freshman member of the Armed Services Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Garcia), an outstanding freshman member of our Conference.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Puerto Rico (Miss Gonzalez-Colon).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill), my friend and an outstanding leader on the Financial Services Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I urge support of the amendments en bloc, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from West Virginia (Mrs. Miller), an outstanding member of the Ways and Means Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman), my friend and colleague, and also the ranking member of the Natural Resources Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Van Duyne), one of our great new freshman members of the Republican Conference.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Perry), an outstanding member of the Republican Conference and a retired general officer.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, this en bloc was put together in close consultation by the majority with the minority. I urge all Members to support it, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman from New York (Ms. Tenney),
an outstanding member of our Conference.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Steil).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Tiffany).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Guthrie), my friend and colleague and a real leader on the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, again, I want to state this en bloc package was reached in close coordination between the majority and minority. I urge its favorable support, and I yield back the balance of my time.