Providing For Exception To Limitation Against Appointment Of Persons As Secretary Of Defense Within Seven Years Of Relief From Active Duty
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, before I begin, I want to take a minute to thank the men and women of the National Guard for the service they have provided in protecting this Capitol over the last 2…
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, before I begin, I want to take a minute to thank the men and women of the National Guard for the service they have provided in protecting this Capitol over the last 2 weeks.
I especially want to thank the 750 men and women from the State of Alabama who came here to the call of duty.
Once again, these citizen soldiers left their homes and their jobs to respond to this call, and, although it is unfortunate they were needed, it is certainly appreciated by all of us that they were here.
Mr. Speaker, I firmly believe that each President deserves the opportunity to fill their Cabinet as they see fit. And I agree that it is important to confirm President Biden's national security team as soon as possible, especially given the grave threats that we face.
Four years ago, this House provided a process to consider a waiver for General Mattis. We were all disappointed when General Mattis did not appear before the Armed Services Committee. Yet the Armed Services Committee still convened and held a public markup of the waiver, which passed without a single vote from any Democrat. Then the full House debated and voted on the waiver.
This time around, the Armed Services Committee was excluded from the process by the Democrat leadership of this House. This was not a decision
made by Chairman Smith, who wanted a public hearing as much as I did. There has been no public hearing, no markup of a waiver, no opportunity for amendments.
Just 4 years ago, Democrat leadership told us how important it was to follow regular order and allow the Armed Services Committee to consider the Mattis waiver.
Speaker Pelosi said, ``The American people are entitled to regular order and thoughtful scrutiny of nominees and any potential waivers.''
Majority Leader Hoyer said, ``The committee has a right and a responsibility to inquire of General Mattis why he thinks he ought to be given a waiver.''
I guess this time around they don't feel the same way.
Mr. Speaker, civilian control of the military is a fundamental tenet of our Republic. It is rooted in our Constitution. The law prohibiting recently retired military from serving as Secretary of Defense was enacted shortly after World War II to uphold this principle.
In nearly 75 years, the law has only been waived twice, for General Marshall and General Mattis. This will be the third time.
But Biden didn't have to do it this way. There was a strong pool of diverse civilians and former military leaders with qualifications and experience to serve as Secretary. President Biden could have selected from this talent pool, but he chose not to.
I voted for the waiver for General Mattis, and I will vote for the waiver for General Austin. For me, it is just fair--a waiver for a Republican President and a waiver for a Democrat President.
But I stand here frustrated by this dysfunctional process. President Trump and President Biden forced this Congress into situations made worse, this time around, by the Speaker's decision to ignore regular order.
Congress should not have to entertain these waivers. Presidents need to follow the law as written. They need to stop asking Congress to waive a statute. And we certainly shouldn't be forced to do so outside of regular order. If Presidents don't think the law matters, then they need to address this waiver issue in this year's NDAA.
Mr. Speaker, America faces extraordinary threats from strategic competitors like China and Russia, rogue nations like Iran and North Korea, as well as terrorists and other transnational enemies. It is more critical now than ever to strengthen our military, address mounting readiness problems, and modernize our conventional and nuclear forces to defeat these threats.
I believe General Austin understands the threats that we face. I believe he respects the principle of civilian control. I believe he will stand up to the efforts of many of the Democrat majority who seek to slash defense spending and rewrite our defense strategy.
I hope the rest of the Biden administration shares his commitment for providing for our men and women in uniform the resources they need to successfully defend our Nation.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I want to address my friend, the chairman's remarks about the establishment of the Armed Services Committee.
We did not establish our members from our steering committee because we didn't get our ratio from the Democrat leadership until last week. It was physically not possible.
Had we gotten our ratio a month ago or even 2 weeks ago, we would have sat our members, and we would have had a sitting committee.
The reason we didn't have a public hearing today, the chairman is right, we didn't have a sitting committee. That is the fault of the Democrat leadership, not the minority.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Gallagher), my friend and colleague.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Jacobs).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Carter), my friend and colleague.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn), who is the ranking member of Readiness Subcommittee.
Mr. Speaker, I have two more speakers who aren't here yet. So I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Issa).
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I continue to reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I continue to reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, at this time, I am prepared to close, and I yield myself such time as I may consume.
First, I want to thank my friend and colleague Chairman Smith, and I look forward to working with him over this 2-year cycle.
The debate we have had today is a serious one. The executive branch is asking the legislative branch to waive a law for its benefit. President Biden knew this law when he selected General Austin. He could have made another selection.
But, as I said earlier, President Trump got a waiver with General Mattis, and I believe it is only right that I supported one waiver for General Austin.
Mr. Speaker, it is critical that the President has his national security team in place as soon as possible. I look forward to working with General Austin if he is confirmed, and I urge a favorable vote.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.