Floor Statements

Mr. President, the Senate began this week with a long list of important unfinished business. And make no mistake--that list remains lengthy. It will require the continued good-faith efforts of Members on both sides of the aisle to keep up the progress.

We need to confirm more of the well-qualified nominees who remain waiting on the Senate's calendar. We need to deliver the targeted resources that are necessary for securing our border and fund the remaining parts of the Federal Government.

Today, of course, debate will continue on the Sanders-Lee resolution with respect to U.S. involvement in Yemen. As I stated yesterday, their resolution is not sufficiently prudent nor sufficiently precise for the job at hand. Yes, the Senate wants Saudi Arabia to act responsibly. We want to see a more stable Yemen for the sake of the Yemeni people. We also want to preserve this 70-year partnership, which serves our interests and helps stabilize a crucial region.

The resolution before us is a blunt and imprecise measure that would not advance these delicate goals. To the contrary, it would jeopardize U.S. support that has actually limited civilian casualties. And I maintain that since genuine hostilities are not involved, the resolution should not even be privileged under the War Powers Act.

I urge my colleagues to vote against their resolution and to support Chairman Corker's more responsible alternative in its place.

Even considering the work still before us, Members should take pride in the significant milestones we have checked off this week.

On Tuesday, the Senate completed the 30th Federal circuit judge confirmation of this Congress.

Yesterday evening, the Senate and the House reached a landmark agreement to reform the process by which Capitol Hill itself handles claims of sexual harassment, discrimination, and other workplace violations. It is a bicameral and bipartisan agreement. It strengthens protections for victims. It ensures that Members of Congress shall be held responsible for their own misconduct, not taxpayers. It contains a number of other important reforms to

create more transparency and accountability in the process. I am very glad Congress will be taking this important step. I want to thank Chairman Blunt and Ranking Member Klobuchar and their counterparts in the House for working hard to get this across the finish line.

That wasn't the only milestone we cleared yesterday. Yesterday afternoon, the House of Representatives joined the Senate in passing the farm bill conference report. Now it is on its way to the President's desk.

The boost this bill delivers couldn't come soon enough. It is no secret that these are tough times in farm country. Falling prices and volatile markets make it harder to make ends meet. Net farm income continues to decline. The threat of natural disasters is a constant fear for even the most skilled and prepared farmers.

Families in my home State of Kentucky are all too familiar with these challenges. Months of heavy rain and severe weather this year have damaged crop yields and increased the burden on producers. We are home to more than 75,000 farms. They produce everything from soybeans and poultry to horses and corn. These families are looking to us for help and stability, and when President Trump signs our farm bill into law, more stability is just what they will get.

I would like to share some of the bill's highlights that will support farm families in the Blue Grass State, by way of example.

In need of certainty and predictability, this farm bill extends a strong commodity safety net and protects crop insurance.

It contains policies to encourage future generations of farmers to plant their own roots--particularly important in States like mine with aging agricultural populations.

To preserve our land for the future, the legislation promotes conservation programs, outdoor recreation, and upgraded watershed and drinking water infrastructure.

For our rural communities, it expands broadband deployment and dedicates further resources to combat the opioid epidemic.

For hundreds of thousands of Kentuckians faced with food insecurity, the farm bill increases funding for emergency programs at food banks.

The legislation provides continued funding for groundbreaking agricultural research at universities and research institutions.

For producers looking for markets abroad, it strengthens our trade programs to develop new opportunities for Kentucky around the globe.

Of course, each of these important victories for Kentucky farmers comes in addition to the new opportunities available with the full legalization of industrial hemp, as I have discussed extensively here on the floor.

All in all, this legislation is a big win for farmers in Kentucky and across our country. I am proud to have played a part in delivering that victory.

It has been my privilege to represent Kentucky farmers on the Agriculture Committee every day I have served in the Senate. The multiyear bill we produced is a credit to the leadership of Chairman Roberts and Ranking Member Stabenow, and now the fruits of their labor are finally on the way to the White House.

I would like to express my gratitude to my follow conferees, especially my colleague from Kentucky, Congressman Jamie Comer.

I would also like to thank the Kentucky Farm Bureau, which has been my partner every step of the way. Earlier this month, the farm bureau announced the beginning of its centennial year. I would be hard-pressed to think of a better way to celebrate that 100th birthday than with a new farm bill.

There is a reason this bill passed both Houses with overwhelming bipartisan majorities. There is a reason this has been a big priority for Congress and the administration. Farming families deserve more stability. Once the President signs this farm bill into law, that is precisely what they will have.

Mr. President, I would like to close by paying tribute to another Member of this body whose retirement in the Senate is fast approaching. This particular Senator, in his own words, grew up on a dry, dusty ranch in Northern Arizona. You might be surprised at that description if you knew only the name of his hometown--``Snowflake.'' But this Navajo County town of a couple of thousand residents wasn't named for its meteorology; it was named for its founding families. It was set up back in 1878 by two wagon train pioneers: Mr. Snow and--that is right--Mr. Flake. It would still be 34 years until Arizona became the 48th State, and 134 years later, that Mormon pioneer's great-great- grandson would be elected to the U.S. Senate.

Jeff Flake is the son of cattle ranchers, so he learned all about ``earmarking'' from an early age. Back when Jeff was serving in the House, he explained in an op-ed that back on the ranch, earmarking was an unsavory way to brand your cattle. Apparently, the practice involves a pocketknife.

Well, Jeff moved on from that cattle pen. He wound up leading a statewide think tank. Then he won election to the House. By the time he arrived here in Washington--filled with equal parts fiery resolve and smalltown collegiality--``earmarks'' had come to mean something very different to him, but, as his House colleagues would soon find out, he found the new meaning just as unappealing.

Jeff's take on fiscal responsibility and good government ruffled some feathers over in the House, but his star kept rising. He didn't seem to mind that lonely feeling that we have all known here in Washington from time to time--the occasional sense that you have wound up on a bit of an island. I mean, Jeff really didn't mind this feeling. This is not a political metaphor, by the way; it is literally one of the man's hobbies.

Starting back in 2009, and several times since, our colleague had decided a ``dream vacation'' means a rugged survival trip where he is marooned on a remote island with just a couple tools. In one eloquent reflection, Jeff described this predilection as ``a long bout of `Caruso envy.' ''

That first time, he traveled alone. To pass the time, there was the standard activities--dodging sharks; spearfishing for breakfast, lunch, and dinner; starting fires with coconut husks and a magnifying glass; befriending the hermit crabs--you know, typical tourist fare.

In fairness to our friend, maybe a solo getaway has a special appeal to anyone who grew up as one of 11 children or, for that matter, I can see why it might tempt a Member of the House, but apparently the appeal was somewhat broader than the alone time because on subsequent trips Jeff actually brought company.

A few years ago, he talked our colleague Martin Heinrich into coming along on one of these adventures. It was just the two of them--and some TV cameras. This was prime time stuff now. The network called the show ``Rival Survival.''

That title actually reminds me of something Jeff said to his former colleagues in the House in his farewell speech, while he was preparing to come over here. He said coming to the Senate was like entering ``enemy territory.'' That is a funny phrase, ``enemy territory.'' It is funny because vitriol and hostility are so precisely not how Senator Flake will be remembered.

Instead, there have been warm and genuine friendships with colleagues on both sides of the aisle and shared work on policy accomplishments that have already made a difference for millions of Americans.

Jeff has cast votes for landmark accomplishments that have tangibly made life better for middle-class families in his home State and across the Nation. We don't have enough time here to name them all.

As part of this majority on behalf of the people of Arizona, Senator Flake gave his vote to start historic tax cuts and tax reform for the American people and to enact major regulatory reforms and to pass bipartisan achievements on every subject from the opioid crisis to caring for our veterans.

So Jeff has achieved much in this high office. He has had a hand in numerous consequential policy victories. A few years back, he was named by The Hill newspaper as the No. 1 most beautiful person on Capitol Hill. Talk about an achievement that few of us can even aspire to.

Seriously, I think we all know that nothing Jeff has done in these hallways will rank as his proudest accomplishment. That has to be persuading Cheryl to marry him and the beautiful family they have built together, five kids--Alexis, Austin, Tanner, Ryan, and Dallin--and now grandchildren.

Almost a decade ago, after his first island adventure, Jeff wrote: ``I will never see a sunset as peaceful as [the ones] I saw there.''

Well, I am not so sure. I suspect that when Jeff is back home with his lovely family by his side--well, with company like that, I expect the Arizona sunsets will give those Pacific nights a run for their money after all.

So we bid farewell to our colleague. We thank him for his service, and we wish him and his family much happiness in the next chapters they will be writing together.

I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. President, before the chairman on Foreign Relations Committee leaves, I want to thank him for his extraordinary leadership. This is a bit of a thicket here with different points of view, but as a result of what the chairman has just offered, it is a clear, unambiguous message about how we feel about what happened to this journalist.

I want to thank him.

Mr. President, I understand that the Senate has received a message from the House to accompany S. 756.

I ask that the Chair lay before the Senate the message to accompany S. 756.

The Presiding Officer laid before the Senate the following message from the House of Representatives:

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 756) entitled

``An Act to reauthorize and amend the Marine Debris Act to

promote international action to reduce marine debris, and for

other purposes.'', do pass with an amendment.

Motion to Concur

Mr. President, I move to concur in the House amendment with a further amendment.

I ask unanimous consent that the reading be dispensed with.

I ask for the yeas and nays on my amendment.

Mr. President, I have a second-degree amendment at the desk.

I ask unanimous consent that the reading be dispensed with.

I ask that the second-degree amendment be divided in three parts in the form at the desk.

Mr. President, I send a cloture motion to the desk for the motion to concur with further amendment.

I ask unanimous consent that the mandatory quorum call be waived.

Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate be in a period of morning business, with Senators permitted to speak therein for up to 10 minutes each.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No. 578, S. 2827.

I ask unanimous consent that the committee-reported substitute amendment be withdrawn and the Barrasso substitute amendment at the desk be agreed to; that the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time and passed; and that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No. 613, S. 645.

I ask unanimous consent that the committee-reported substitute amendment be agreed to; that the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time and passed; and that the motions to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs be discharged from further consideration of H.R. 4431 and the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration.

I ask unanimous consent that the bill be considered read a third time and passed and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs be discharged from further consideration of H.R. 6160 and Senate proceed to its immediate consideration.

I ask unanimous consent that the bill be considered read a third time and passed and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of H.R. 1318, the Preventing Maternal Deaths Act, which was received from the House.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the bill be considered read a third time and passed and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions be discharged and that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of S. 2322.

I ask unanimous consent that the Johnson amendment at the desk be agreed to and that the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time.

Mr. President, I know of no further debate on the bill, as amended.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs be discharged from further consideration of S. 2863 and that the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration.

I ask unanimous consent that the bill be considered read a third time.

I know of no further debate on the bill.

I ask unanimous consent that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be discharged from further consideration of S. 3461 and that the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration.

I further ask unanimous consent that the amendment at the desk be agreed to; that the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time and passed; and that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be discharged from further consideration of S. Res. 717 and that the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration.

I further ask unanimous consent that the resolution be agreed to; that the preamble be agreed to; and that the motions to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate.