Mr. President, reserving the right to object, as I have said, I share my colleague's concern with making sure that our servicemembers do not miss a paycheck because of a potential government shutdown. In fact, I do not want any of our…
Mr. President, reserving the right to object, as I have said, I share my colleague's concern with making sure that our servicemembers do not miss a paycheck because of a potential government shutdown. In fact, I do not want any of our Federal workers to miss a paycheck, whether they are cancer researchers whose work saves our lives or brave firefighters who risk their lives for us, and I don't want any programs families rely on to be undermined: counseling and transition assistance for new veterans adjusting to civilian life, nutrition assistance for 7 million moms and kids who need a hand up. And that includes our servicemembers' families.
Several years ago, I worked to save a WIC clinic which was going to be kicked off a Navy base in my home State of Washington that hundreds of military families counted on. None of those paychecks for any of these workers and none of those programs should shutter because of a completely unnecessary shutdown, which is why I am working around the clock with the majority of our colleagues to make sure that we do pass a bipartisan CR, which we released this week, because that is the only serious solution here. That is the only way that we will make sure everyone is able to keep doing the work that the American people count on and getting that paycheck that they do deserve.
If the Senator from Alaska or the Senator from Texas are serious about making sure our servicemembers get paid, I hope they will get serious in a way that matters the most, and that is their votes. I hope they will work with us to keep the government open. And I hope they will reconsider their recent votes against the CR to fund the government in a bipartisan and timely way.
Let's be real. You cannot grandstand about wanting to make sure that servicemembers get paid during a shutdown and then vote against the very bipartisan bill that prevented a shutdown.
I also hope the Senators will understand that our servicemembers will see the harm of a government shutdown in so many other ways. Permanent change-in-station moves will be significantly curtailed, meaning that some of our families could be left without a place to live if they have already sold their house or broken their lease or they could be forced to pay for two homes at once. For the Army alone, this means approximately 2,100 moves every week. And if you do not work with us to keep the entire government open, servicemembers' elective surgeries and procedures at DOD medical and dental facilities would have to be postponed. And, by the way, an elective surgery could be anything from removing a kidney stone to a mastectomy for breast cancer.
Essentially, post and base services will be closed or severely limited. That is everything from our commissary statewide to childcare our military families count on.
So not only do I want to make sure that our servicemembers don't miss a paycheck, I want to make sure that our servicemembers don't miss out on any critical services they rely on every day.
The Senators should also understand that their focus and support of the military cannot end with those who are currently in uniform. And they should remember, 47 percent of Department of Defense civilians are veterans. And for that matter, one in every four employees across the entire Federal Government are veterans. We can't leave anyone behind.
So I will say it again for my colleagues who raise their voices here on the Senate floor but have not cast their votes to prevent a shutdown: There are a lot of programs I care about, a lot of programs we all care about that would be hurt by a shutdown. But we are not going to solve this problem one by one, carve-out by carve-out. The best solution is to stop a shutdown in the first place. That is something we can do. And I bet we could do it a lot more quickly if the Senators from Alaska and Texas would earnestly work with us.
This isn't complicated. We have a straightforward, bipartisan CR package that will avoid that shutdown, keep our military paid. So let's get our jobs done and get that passed. I object.
Madam President, Americans across the country are watching us now, as we near the brink of an entirely pointless and absolutely devastating government shutdown and wondering: How in the world did we get here? It is a great question and an infuriating one.
So I want to take a few minutes to walk through exactly how we did get here, because the plain truth I want the American people to recognize is, it did not have to be this way. But a number of House Republicans, who have been working from day one of this Congress to hold our government hostage, pushed the most extreme partisan agenda imaginable and set us on a collision course for a government shutdown.
You don't have to take my word for it. Just listen to what some of them have been saying:
If a shutdown occurs, then so be it.
We should not fear a government shutdown.
It is ``not the worst thing that could happen.''
And this quote:
[M]ay be what it takes.
Last week, of course, former President Trump--the same guy responsible for the longest shutdown in history--called for Republicans to shut down the government again.
Unfortunately, it sure seems like these are the sorts of people Speaker McCarthy has been listening to--the most extreme, fringed voices in his party--when he should be listening to the overwhelming majority of people in our country who do not want a shutdown, because, let's be clear, most Members of Congress--like most Americans--on both sides of the aisle here, in both Chambers of Congress, do not want a government shutdown. They do want to see us working together to get our jobs done.
This is something I have heard from so many of our colleagues when I became chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee at the beginning of
this year: We need to get back to regular order. No more omnibuses. No more chaos. No more government shutdowns. I heard it from across both parties here in the Senate.
So I have been working with the senior Senator from Maine to deliver on just that: to make our appropriations process work better, to get our bills done, and to ensure that all Members do have a say in the process.
We have made some concrete progress; but over and over, extreme Republicans in the House have put up roadblocks and done everything they can to prevent Congress from getting even the most basic things done.
The vice chair of the Appropriations Committee and I held nearly 50 hearings this past spring to evaluate what resources our communities need in the year ahead. But, then, instead of being able to get right to work and negotiate top-line spending numbers and writing those bills as we finished those hearings this spring, we had to press pause to contend with extreme Republicans who were then holding our Nation's credit hostage and threatening a devastating default if they did not get their way with unrealistic, draconian cuts to programs that this entire country relies on.
It was a full-blown crisis. It was created by extreme House Republicans who ground Congress and almost our economy to a halt.
Finally, after their dangerous brinksmanship caused so much unnecessary drama and delay, President Biden and Speaker McCarthy struck a deal on spending levels that rejected the deepest, most damaging cuts. Now, it was not a deal I would have written myself-- absolutely not--but a deal is a deal.
The Speaker and the President shook hands. We all voted on it. It was signed into law. We had an agreement so we here in the Senate could finally get to work writing our bipartisan spending bills.
And in the Senate, that is exactly what we did. The senior Senator from Maine and I said: Okay, let's get things back on track. Let's get back to regular order. Let's write serious bills that can actually be signed into law.
We agreed to work off that Biden-McCarthy deal in a bipartisan way to avoid partisan poison pills and give all of our colleagues input on those bills. We held televised, bipartisan markups with amendments, with debate. And, for the first time in 5 years, we passed all 12 bills out of the committee, and those bills passed overwhelmingly with bipartisan support. We then got a resounding 91 votes to start work on three appropriations bills that passed unanimously out of committee on the Senate floor.
As we know, a few holdouts slowed things down. But I want you to know we are going to keep working together to return to regular order so Members can debate appropriations bills and offer amendments, and we can get them passed.
Now, compare that to the House. Did they work to produce serious, bipartisan appropriations bills that can be signed into law? Nope. They wrote extreme partisan bills--extreme--that are not going anywhere.
Did they keep out provisions that they knew would be nonstarters? Absolutely not. Their appropriations bills are a far-right wish list chock full of extreme policies that would undermine our response to the climate crisis, embolden bigotry against the LGBTQ community, weaken commonsense gun safety regulations, and, of course--of course--impose extreme abortion restrictions.
I mean, the list of extreme far-right policies that were slapped onto the government spending bills in the House is astounding. If you want to get something done for your constituents, you need to get serious, and those bills are not serious.
Did House Republicans, at least, stick to the bipartisan top lines that President Biden and Speaker McCarthy agreed to and we all voted on? Not even in the slightest. Before the ink was dry on that deal that he shook hands on, Speaker McCarthy caved to demands from the far right to ignore those agreed-upon spending levels and take a hatchet to programs that our families rely on.
In those spending bills, House Republicans want to cut 80 percent--8- 0--80 percent, that is $14.7 billion from title I funding our public schools rely on. It supports nearly 90 percent of our Nation's school districts. That includes rescinding funding that Congress provided last year that schools have worked into their budgets and are using for this school year.
They want to cut grants that keep our drinking water safe by more than half.
They want to slash nearly $4 billion from lifesaving research at the
Madam President, reserving the right to object, we can't be back here in the same situation in 2 weeks. We need a CR that gives us the actual time to get through our bipartisan spending bills. Believe me, I would love to say we could get this done in 2 weeks. But we know that is not realistic, because even the three that passed unanimously out of my committee have run into delays, as the Senator from Wisconsin knows all too well.
And, just as importantly, this bill does nothing to reauthorize time- sensitive programs. It does not reauthorize the FAA, which means chaos for air travelers. It doesn't reauthorize our community health centers and other critical primary care programs, which means patients in our underserved areas will lose access to programs they need.
And it doesn't protect our wildland firefighters from a drastic pay cut. It doesn't extend disaster relief funding or Ukraine's aid.
We have before this body a carefully negotiated bipartisan CR that does include all of those absolutely essential policies, that has already garnered more than enough support to pass here in the Senate, and that I am confident will pass the House as soon as Speaker McCarthy actually puts it to a vote.
That is where our attention needs to be, not on a slapdash bill that puts us back here in 2 weeks and completely leaves air travel, health care providers, firefighters, and so much more in a lurch.
I object.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.