Madam Speaker, it is my distinct pleasure to congratulate Mr. Andrew O'Rourke for his articulate essay on the impact of the recent mid-term elections on the current U.S. policy in Iraq. Andrew is a 20-year-old sophomore at the University…
Madam Speaker, it is my distinct pleasure to congratulate Mr. Andrew O'Rourke for his articulate essay on the impact of the recent mid-term elections on the current U.S. policy in Iraq. Andrew is a 20-year-old sophomore at the University of Marquette, where his studies have focused on communications, business, and political science courses. His hard work in school has resulted in good grades, and he plans on attending law school after gradation. I am truly impressed by his insights, as well as the quality of his work.
Andrew's essay encapsulates much of the frustration with America's direction that has been felt by my constituents in the First District of Indiana. His essay also expresses the desire for positive change in America. Andrew compels his readers to think hard about what this country means to them. He writes of the pitfalls of shortsightedness in foreign policy, as well as the importance of protecting our civil liberties here at home. Finally, he calls on the need for bipartisanship in order to form a strong-willed consensus for the road ahead.
Madam Speaker, Andrew O'Rourke is an example of the great potential exhibited by the young people of northwest Indiana. Below, you will find the text of his essay, which I would like to have included in the Congressional Record. At this time, I ask that you and all of my distinguished colleagues join me in commending Andrew O'Rourke for his well-written essay. I wish him continued success in all his endeavors.
While Democrats are better equipped now to make some
difference in President Bush's foreign policy, no force will
be able to influence the President more than a united
Republican thrust in favor of U.S. troop withdrawal.
President Bush has proved rather stubborn on the subject of
his foreign policy, specifically the aspects of said policy
pertaining to Iraq and well, the entire Middle East in
general. Despite the sweeping restructuring of the House and
Senate during the mid-term elections, President Bush appears
still to have no intent on altering the current policy in
Iraq. An excerpt from a recent New York Times editorial
summarizes my argument quite well. The like-minded author of
this article believes that the President, ``for all of his
professed pipe dreams about democracy in the Middle East,
refuses to surrender to democracy's verdict at home.''
It seems an indictment of our system, supposedly the best
in the world, that a mid-term election could serve the
umbrella purpose of a referendum on one specifically
controversial and pivotal policy, only to have
the said election results have absolutely no effect on the
policy. That does not fit the definition of representative
democracy I was raised to believe in since grade school.
Elected officials do not possess the right to represent the
people when and if they chose, as though they know best. We
do not live under a benevolent dictator, where the power of
decision is placed in the hands of a ruler whom we must trust
to make a conclusion we are otherwise deemed incapable of
making ourselves. Nor do we live in a country where the
wealthy elite enjoy all of the authority, sending young men
and women of the poor and middle classes off to become maimed
Purple Heart veterans and dead Medal of Honor heroes,
fighting in an utterly fruitless quagmire of a war.
Especially of late however, the aforementioned possibilities
seem likely explanations for the current shameful, stubborn,
and painfully simplistic foreign policy utilized by our great
nation, with its outrageously gigantic economy,
technologically superior mechanized army, and not to forget,
insatiable thirst for pure, unadulterated, according-to-hoyle
victory. Although many would love to believe such a naive,
black-and-white definition of victory, sadly like most things
in this world it is not that simple. Victory is a word that,
for every conceivable variable, from the largest, most holy
mosque destroyed by American artillery fire to the youngest
Iraqi girl whose parents were brutally murdered by either a
Sunni or Shiite deathsquad, has numerous definitions. You
cannot limit yourself to one characterization of what victory
is, for that is a direct route to complete failure and
disappointment, as we see everyday on CNN, when we are told
the story of another Joe Everyman 21-year-old private-first
class from anywhere USA who was killed on a humvee patrol
mission aimed at securing the other ninety-five percent of
Iraq not secured over three years ago when we triumphantly
declared mission accomplished, and were immediately showered
with flowers by the Iraqi people. And to those within this
country who believe that to withdraw will be a crushing blow
against American pride and standing in the world, expound
such blind patriotism when it is your son or daughter
walking the streets of Baghdad with no idea whether the
next street corner will be populated by a nearly invisible
IED, exactly like those that have crippled so many young,
promise-filled Americans, or one of the many deceivingly
well-hidden snipers who make steady sport of firing
potshots from a spire outside of an untouchably holy
Mosque, hitting our young men and women when they least
expect it. It is for these American heroes that I, along
with most Americans must hope President Bush's current
policy is a success.
Because I know in my heart of hearts that this
administration is too prideful to consider taking a hint from
the American people, or the 9/11 Commission, or the Iraq
Study Group, I am forced to cheer for any alternative to the
current policy of ``stay the course'' while simultaneously
hoping that the abovementioned ``course staying'' rises like
the Phoenix from the ashes and succeeds. If Mr. Bush's
strategy is a success, which it appears as though, barring
some unforeseen circumstance, it most definitely will not be,
it will be a victory for the American fighting man and woman,
because until the next pre-emptive war, they will be safe.
But will the next be somewhere in Asia, Northern Africa, or
most likely the Middle East yet again? Iran and Syria both
seem hell bent on becoming America's Tour of the Arab World
stops two and three.
Most likely it will take Republican pressure and lots of it
to revise in any way the single-minded policy of this
administration. Nevertheless, it is a heartrending day for
democracy when the resounding message of the American people
is deemed secondary to the egocentric and stubborn strategy
of a few white men (and black woman) who call a giant, white,
house on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington D.C. their office.
To reiterate an earlier point, the leaders of this nation
are not free to choose what is in our best interest, when we
the people have clearly and resoundingly spoken against the
current ideals and strategies. The current policy quite
simply costs too many Americans and Iraqis their lives
without a foreseeable goal or proverbial light at the end of
the tunnel. Rather, they have a solemn obligation to
represent the views of the people of this country. But who
knows? Maybe a benevolent dictator would make things a whole
lot easier for most people in this country. Who likes freedom
anyways?