Financial Services And General Government Appropriations Act, 2008
Mr. Chairman I move to strike the requisite number of words. Mr. Chairman, I yield to the distinguished minority whip to engage in a colloquy. I thank the gentleman for his concern regarding this important issue. The digital transition…
Mr. Chairman I move to strike the requisite number of words.
Mr. Chairman, I yield to the distinguished minority whip to engage in a colloquy.
I thank the gentleman for his concern regarding this important issue. The digital transition will have many consequences, some unintended, such as the situation the gentleman described in Missouri.
I look forward to working with the minority whip, the chairman, and the FCC to bring resolution to this issue over the next few months and prior to the enactment of this bill.
Mr. Chairman, I yield to the chairman of the subcommittee.
Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number of words.
I yield to the gentleman from Montana (Mr. Rehberg), a member of the subcommittee.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve a point of order.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Chairman, I agree with the gentleman that the Office of Inspector General at the GSA needs adequate funds to operate. But, Chairman Serrano's mark provided a level of funds that is both responsible and sufficient for the OIG.
In the fiscal year 2007 continuing resolution, the Congress provided $6 million in additional funds to the OIG. They were not able to spend these funds in the fiscal year, and have asked for the authority to assess them in fiscal year 2008. This authority has been granted by the committee.
Chairman Serrano has made funding the Office of Inspector General and the other oversight offices one of his highest priorities in this bill. I commend him for his work, and oppose this attempt to change the committee mark.
I question the ability of the OIG to spend these additional funds this year, and I reiterate the fact that this was taken care of in the previous legislation. Therefore, I urge the defeat of this amendment.
Mr. Chairman, I just want to quote from former President Clinton in a 1994 letter to Congress, where he said, and I agree: ``Maintaining the Selective Service provides a hedge against unforeseen threats.''
And I also agree with the gentleman from Wisconsin that this is not the time, and I certainly urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number of words.
Mr. Chairman, I yield to the gentleman from Virginia.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number of words.
Mr. Chairman, I oppose the gentleman's amendment. I am not going to call for a vote. I think this is something that needs to be studied a little more, and would anticipate that in conference we would try to address the problem. This Executive Order is relatively new. I am not sure what the impact of that would be nor what the impact of this amendment would be.
For the record, tonight I oppose it. As I say, I am not going to call for a vote on it, but I think the chairman and I ought to take a second look at it and decide whether we want to address the issue in conference.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back my time.
On this side we are ready to accept it also.
Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number of words.
I yield to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Garrett).
Mr. Chairman, I yield to the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Frank).
Mr. Chairman, reclaiming my time, I yield to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Feeney).
I yield to the gentleman from Massachusetts.
Reclaiming my time, and I yield to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Feeney).
Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number of words.
I yield to the gentleman from Indiana.
I yield to the gentleman from Wisconsin.
I yield to the gentleman from Indiana.
I yield back the balance of my time.