Will the gentleman yield? Mr. Speaker, I am going to be reading the email portions of Rob Goldstone to Donald Trump, Jr. On June 3, 2016, at 10:36 a.m., Rob Goldstone wrote to Donald Trump, Jr., the following: ``Good morning. ``Emin just…
Will the gentleman yield?
Mr. Speaker, I am going to be reading the email portions of Rob Goldstone to Donald Trump, Jr. On June 3, 2016, at 10:36 a.m., Rob Goldstone wrote to Donald Trump, Jr., the following:
``Good morning.
``Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting.
``The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.
``This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump--helped along by Aras and Emin.
``What do you think is the best way to handle this information and would you be able to speak to Emin about it directly?
``I can also send this info to your father via Rhona, but it is ultra sensitive so wanted to send to you first.
``Best.
``Rob Goldstone.''
Mr. Speaker, after we finish reading these emails into the Congressional Record, we are going to discuss why it is a straight-up violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act.
On Monday, June 6, 2016, Rob Goldstone writes back to Donald Trump, Jr., in an email at 12:40 p.m., with a subject heading: ``Russia-- Clinton--private and confidential.''
``Hi, Don.
``Let me know when you are free to talk with Emin by phone about this Hillary info--you had mentioned early this week so wanted to try to schedule a time and day.
``Best to you and family.
``Rob Goldstone.''
On June 6, 2016, at 3:03 p.m., Donald Trump, Jr., wrote back:
``Rob, could we speak now?
``D.''
Then Rob Goldstone replies to Donald Trump, Jr., that same day at 3:37 p.m.:
``Let me track him down in Moscow.
``What number he could call?''
By the way, any email where someone says tracking someone down in Moscow might just raise some red flags.
Then Rob Goldstone replies: ``Okay. He is on stage in Moscow but should be off within 20 minutes so I am sure can call.
``Rob.''
The next day, on June 7, 2016, at 4:20 p.m., Rob Goldstone writes:
``Don.
``Hope all is well.
``Emin asked that I schedule a meeting with you and the Russian Government attorney who is flying over from Moscow for this Thursday.
``I believe you are aware of the meeting--and so wondered if 3 p.m. or later on Thursday works for you?
``I assume it would be at your office.
``Best.
``Rob Goldstone.''
Later that same day, on June 7, 2016, Rob Goldstone wrote back to Donald Trump, Jr.:
``Perfect won't sit in on the meeting, but will bring them at 3 p.m. and introduce you, et cetera?
``I will send the names of the two people meeting with you for security when I have them later today.
``Best.
``Rob.''
By the way, we now know today that one of those names just happens to be a Soviet counterintelligence officer.
On June 8, the next day, at 10:34 a.m., Rob Goldstone writes back to Donald Trump, Jr.:
``Good morning.
``Would it be possible to move tomorrow meeting to 4 p.m. as the Russian attorney is in court until 3, I was just informed?
``Best.
``Rob.''
On Wednesday, June 8, 2016, at 11:18 a.m., Rob Goldstone writes back:
``They can't do today as she hasn't landed yet from Moscow, 4 p.m. is great tomorrow.
``Best.
``Rob.''
So that completes the email chain.
Under Federal law, under the Federal Election Campaign Act, you cannot solicit or accept any contribution from a foreign national or foreign country. The law defines a contribution not as just a monetary donation but anything of value, an in-kind donation, opposition research, anything of value violates the law.
In this case, we absolutely have conspiracy to violate the Federal Election Campaign Act.
I am a former prosecutor. I know it is very easy to prove a charge of conspiracy. You just have to have the person take one act in furtherance of the conspiracy. So in this case, when Donald Trump, Jr., replies back to the offer of this incriminating information, Hillary Clinton, and says, ``I love it,'' that is one act. He then proceeds to set up a meeting. That is another act. He then shows up at the meeting with Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort. That is a third act. That more than completes a crime conspiracy. We have in black and white right here a violation of Federal law.
Our security clearances would have been suspended immediately. An investigation would have been opened.
I am glad you mentioned Jared Kushner because many of us are wondering, why does he still have a security clearance? Why is he even in the White House?
Let's just sort of walk through a little bit of what happened with his security clearance. On the very first security clearance form, known as an SF-86 form, he lied on it. He did not disclose a single meeting with the Russians.
If you read the form, it says: if you make a false statement or omit material facts, you can be imprisoned.
He omitted all that information. He is then confronted, and what does he do? He revises it. So then he submits a second security clearance form.
Now, it turns out he lied on that one, too, because he did not disclose this latest meeting that happened to be with a Russian counterintelligence officer. So then he had to submit a third form. When you look at his explanation, according to media reports, he said that his staff hit the send button too soon.
Well, both Representative Gallego and I know that that is not how you submit the security clearance form. It is a pretty involved, elaborate process. You have to do this certification. Not only do you have to send it electronically, then you have to sign the paper and submit that with your signature on it--very elaborate.
So now he is lying about the process in which he lied on the three security clearance forms. We don't know why he has a security clearance. We don't know why he is even in the White House.
So let me follow up what Representative Gallego said. We have a person in the White House now with a security clearance even though he has lied on at least two of those forms. So there actually needs to be an investigation. That security clearance needs to be suspended immediately.
But, also, for any intelligence official watching this or reading about this, how can you trust Jared Kushner when he lied on these security clearance forms and makes a mockery of the process?
Keep in mind this is the same person who suggested setting up a secret back channel with the Russians at the Russian Embassy. So the only reason you would want to use Russian equipment at the Russian Embassy is to hide information from U.S. intelligence. So even if his security clearance is not suspended, I really hope that people working for him do not trust him.
Let me conclude by saying that the President said that most people would have taken this meeting. That is just not true.
Again, under the Federal Election Campaign Act, if you solicit, or conspire to solicit, or show up at a meeting where you expect to get opposition research from a foreign national, that is a violation of the Federal law. So, in fact, most people would not have taken this meeting unless they were crooked.
We have an example here of what happened when the Al Gore campaign got information. They were sent anonymously briefing notes and things that then Bush was being briefed on and so on. They took that package, and they turned it over to the FBI. That is what should have happened in this case.
In conclusion, this is a pretty big deal. We have people in the White House who believe they are above the law. The lesson in Watergate is that no one is above the law.