Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank Chairman Scott for the time that he has put in on this incredible piece of legislation, and thank Representative Davis for the work done to put together this important work. As my colleagues today have…
Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank Chairman Scott for the time that he has put in on this incredible piece of legislation, and thank Representative Davis for the work done to put together this important work.
As my colleagues today have said, this is a bipartisan, commonsense bill. It is exactly the type of work and things that Congress should be doing. This is our system at work.
The facts are very simple: Right now, because of a court decision, the standards for age discrimination are higher than that of any other type of discrimination. This bill fixes that and returns the country to what it was intended to be; that all forms of discrimination are illegal and must be stopped; that no form of discrimination is less wrong than another form of discrimination.
This is the right thing to do and this is the right time to do it. That higher standard has made it harder to prove cases and leaves older workers exposed to discrimination.
Age discrimination is wrong, plain and simple. It is also costly. According to a study by AARP, we lose out on $850 million of GDP each year because of it.
The cost is not just in abstract dollars. It comes from Americans who were skipped over for promotions they deserved. It comes from constituents who want to switch jobs but don't get a call back. It comes from your neighbor who lost their job and can still work but can't get anyone to even look at their resume.
The standard for proving age discrimination must be fair, it must be level, and it must be treated as other forms of discrimination.
Americans of all ages deserve the chance to work and to provide for their families, and the law should recognize their ability to work.
There is no place for ageism in the workforce, and this must stop.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record a letter of support from The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights dated June 22, 2021, asking for a yes vote on the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act, H.R. 2062.
The Leadership Conference
on Civil and Human Rights,
Washington, DC, June 22, 2021.
vote Yes on the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act
(POWADA), H.R. 2062
Dear Representative: On behalf of The Leadership Conference
on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition charged by its diverse
membership of more than 220 national organizations to promote
and protect the civil and human rights of all persons in the
United States, we urge you to vote yes on H.R. 2062, the
Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act (POWADA),
without amendments that would limit the bill's scope or
undermine its protections. POWADA is a priority of The
Leadership Conference, and we will include your vote in our
voting record for the 117th Congress.
Despite longstanding federal prohibitions against workplace
discrimination based on age, pervasive age discrimination in
the United States continues to harm older workers--denying
working people dignity on the job and threatening their
economic security. In 2020, 78 percent of older workers
reported
having seen or experienced age discrimination in the
workplace, with Hispanic workers perceiving slightly more age
discrimination at 82 percent. These numbers reflect an
increase in age discrimination during the COVID-19 pandemic
for all workers, across race and gender. Previous research on
age discrimination before the pandemic reflects that women
workers and workers of color, especially Black workers, have
been more likely to experience age discrimination, and
unemployment rates suggest that workers of color may continue
to be more vulnerable. For example, although the unemployment
rate in May 2021 for White workers ages 45-59 was 4.2
percent, for Black workers, the rate was 10.6 percent.
The ability to enjoy employment opportunities, free from
unlawful discrimination, is key to promoting economic
security for marginalized and multi-marginalized communities.
Systemic racism and decades of structural inequality in
almost every area of life, including education, health care,
housing, and employment, have resulted in economic disparties
that have severely threatened the lives and well-being of far
too many people in the United States. Women, for example, are
nearly two-thirds of all individuals aged 65 and over living
in poverty, with women of color struggling at increased
rates. LGBTQ older adults are also at increased risk of
poverty compared to non-LGBTQ older adults, and people with
disabilities are twice as likely to live in poverty than
people without disabilities. Congress must ensure that our
federal laws are able to protect all persons in the United
States from unlawful discrimination. A key step toward that
goal is to ensure that unlawful discrimination plays no role
in employment practices,
POWADA is critically needed legislation that would restore
fairness by reinstating well-established legal protections
against workplace discrimination that were undermined by the
2009 Supreme Court decision in Gross v. FBL Financial
Services, Inc, which imposed a higher burden of proof on
working people in age discrimination cases. After Gross,
working people must prove not only that age discrimination
influenced an employer's conduct but that age played a
decisive role in the employer's conduct. The burden of proof
for age discrimination is now higher than the standard of
proof for allegations of discrimination based on sex, race,
religion, or national origin, sending the signal that some
amount of age discrimination in the workplace is acceptable.
Just as troubling, though, is that the Gross decision paved
the way for the same unreasonably difficult burden of proof
in cases in which an employer retaliates against workers who
challenge workplace discrimination based on race, sex, or
other grounds. POWADA is necessary to return the law to what
it was before the Gross decision.
Simply put, no amount of unlawful discrimination in the
workplace is acceptable. We therefore urge you to vote yes on
H.R. 2062, the Protecting Older Workers Against
Discrimination Act. If you have any questions or would like
to discuss this matter further, please contact Gaylynn
Burroughs, senior policy counsel.
Sincerely,
Wade Henderson,
Interim President & CEO.
Jesselyn McCurdy,
Managing Director and Interim Executive Vice President for
Government Affairs.