S.Amdt. 1837Senate108th Congress (2003-2005)

To ensure that a Federal employee who takes leave without pay in order to perform certain service as a member of the uniformed services or member of the National Guard shall continue to receive pay in an amount which, when taken together with the pay and allowances such individual is receiving for such service, will be no less than the basic pay such individual would then be receiving if no interruption in employment had occurred.

Submitted October 14, 2003

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

8 earlier actions
Floor Latest Action

Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 1837 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96 - 3. Record Vote Number: 390.

October 17, 2003

View full timeline
Floor

Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 1837 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96 - 3. Record Vote Number: 390.

October 17, 2003

Floor

Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 1837 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96 - 3. Record Vote Number: 390.

October 17, 2003

Floor

Amendment SA 1837 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96 - 3. Record Vote Number: 390.

October 17, 2003

Floor

Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S12770)

October 17, 2003

Floor

Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S12643, CR 10/17/2003 S12715)

October 16, 2003

Floor

Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S12574)

October 15, 2003

Floor

Senate amendment submitted

October 14, 2003

Floor

Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 1837 proposed by Senator Durbin.(consideration: CR S12524-12525; text: CR S12524)

October 14, 2003

Floor

Amendment SA 1837 proposed by Senator Durbin. (consideration: CR S12524-12525; text: CR S12524) To ensure that a Federal employee who takes leave without pay in order to perform certain service as a member of the uniformed services or member of the National Guard shall continue to receive pay in an amount which, when taken together with the pay and allowances such individual is receiving for such service, will be no less than the basic pay such individual would then be receiving if no interruption in employment had occurred.

October 14, 2003

Text

Submitted

Plain text for this version is not available yet.