To express the sense of the Senate.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
November 17, 2005
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
November 17, 2005
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 2654 proposed by Senator Grassley.
November 17, 2005
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Motion to waive the Budget Act with respect to amendment SA 2654 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 53 - 45. Record Vote Number: 336.
November 17, 2005
Amendment SA 2654 proposed by Senator Grassley. (consideration: CR S13123-13124; text: CR S13123) To express the sense of the Senate.
November 17, 2005
Point of order raised in Senate with respect to amendment SA 2654.
November 17, 2005
Motion to waive the Budget Act with respect to amendment SA 2654 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 53 - 45. Record Vote Number: 336.
November 17, 2005
Amendment SA 2654 ruled out of order by the chair.
November 17, 2005
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 2654. Mr. GRASSLEY proposed an amendment to the bill S. 2020, to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 202(b) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006; as follows: At the end of title IV, add the following: SEC. ___. SENSE OF THE SENATE. (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings: (1) As many as 44,000,000 Americans are estimated to lack health insurance during the course of the year, many of whom are uninsured for a short period of time while a smaller number face longer periods without coverage. (2) Rising health care costs contribute to the problem of the uninsured and make it more difficult to find a simple solution to make health care affordable. (3) There is not a one-size fits all solution to address health care coverage issues. (4) Businesses have competing needs for their resources, including investments to ensure their competitiveness and providing health care coverage for their employees and dependents. (5) Lower tax rates on dividends and capital gains saved 24,000,000 families an average of nearly $950 on their 2004 taxes, including about 7,000,000 seniors who saved, on average, $1,230 each. (6) These pro-growth tax cuts have spurred economic development and job creation and have been partly responsible for an increase in tax receipts. (7) Of the more than 30,000,000 tax returns that included dividend income, those with adjusted gross income of less than $75,000 accounted for 64 percent, or over 19,000,000 of such returns. (8) Of the nearly 23,000,000 tax returns that included capital gains, 62 percent of these returns, or about 14,000,000, had less than $75,000 in adjusted gross income. (9) Allowing taxes to increase will make it harder for employers and individuals to afford health care insurance, leading to more individuals without health insurance. (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the Senate should-- (1) prevent an increase in taxes on millions of Americans by not allowing the tax policy enacted in 2003 to expire; and (2) extend tax policies that have proven to enhance economic growth, create jobs, and improve business' and individuals' ability to afford health insurance coverage; and (3) address the multiple aspects of our Nation's health care crisis, including the need to make health care more affordable, to expand coverage, and to strengthen the health care safety net by-- (A) promoting the use of health care technology, which will help reduce medical errors that contribute to higher costs and promote greater efficiency in care delivery; (B) providing new financial assistance and tax credits to make health insurance more affordable; (C) creating financial incentives for young adults to purchase lifetime, portable health insurance; (D) expanding health insurance coverage options for low- income entrepreneurs and self-employed individuals; (E) increasing access to specialty care within the health care safety net by providing a tax deduction to physician specialists who provide care for patients referred from health care safety net providers; (F) reducing regulatory burdens on health care safety net providers that lead to higher administrative costs and a diversion of funds that could be spent on patient care; and (G) improving outreach efforts to maximize participation of eligible beneficiaries in Federal health care safety net programs. ______