To exempt debtors from means testing if their financial problems were caused by identity theft.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 37 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 37 - 61. Record Vote Number: 21.
March 3, 2005
View full timeline
Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 37 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 37 - 61. Record Vote Number: 21.
March 3, 2005
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 37 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 37 - 61. Record Vote Number: 21.
March 3, 2005
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1979, S1982-1983)
March 3, 2005
Amendment SA 37 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 37 - 61. Record Vote Number: 21.
March 3, 2005
Senate amendment submitted
March 2, 2005
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 37 proposed by Senator Nelson FL.
March 2, 2005
Amendment SA 37 proposed by Senator Nelson FL. (consideration: CR S1918-1920; text: CR S1918) To exempt debtors from means testing if their financial problems were caused by identity theft.
March 2, 2005
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 37. Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Schumer, and Mrs. Clinton) proposed an amendment to the bill S. 256, to amend title 11 of the United States Code, and for other purposes; as follows: At the appropriate place, insert the following: SEC. __. IDENTITY THEFT. (a) Definition.--Section 101 of title 11, United States Code, as amended by this Act, is further amended-- (1) by redesignating paragraph (27B) as paragraph (27D); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (27A) the following: ``(27B) `identity theft' means a fraud committed or attempted using the personally identifiable information of another person; ``(27C) `identity theft victim' means a debtor who, as a result of an identify theft in any consecutive 12-month period during the 3-year period before the date on which a petition is filed under this title, had claims asserted against such debtor in excess of the least of-- ``(A) $20,000; ``(B) 50 percent of all claims asserted against such debtor; or ``(C) 25 percent of the debtor's gross income for such 12- month period.''. (b) Prohibition.--Section 707(b) of title 11, United States Code, as amended by section 102(a) of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following: ``(8)(A) No judge, United States trustee (or bankruptcy administrator, if any), trustee, or other party in interest may file a motion under paragraph (2) if the debtor is an identity theft victim.''. ______