To modify a section relating to independent peer review of water resources projects.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
July 19, 2006
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
July 19, 2006
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 4681 as modified agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 54 - 46. Record Vote Number: 208.
July 19, 2006
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 4681 as modified agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 54 - 46. Record Vote Number: 208.
July 19, 2006
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 4681 proposed by Senator Feingold.
July 19, 2006
Amendment SA 4681 proposed by Senator Feingold. (consideration: CR S7814-7824, S7839) To modify a section relating to independent peer review of water resources projects.
July 19, 2006
Amendment SA 4681 as modified agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 54 - 46. Record Vote Number: 208. (text as modified: CR S7814-7815)
July 19, 2006
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 4681. Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Mr. McCain, Mr. Carper, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Jeffords, Ms. Collins, and Ms. Snowe) proposed an amendment to the bill S. 728, to provide for the consideration and development of water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, and for other purposes; as follows: Strike section 2007 and insert the following: SEC. 2007. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Construction activities.--The term ``construction activities'' means development of detailed engineering and design specifications during the preconstruction engineering and design phase and the engineering and design phase of a water resources project carried out by the Corps of Engineers, and other activities carried out on a water resources project prior to completion of the construction and to turning the project over to the local cost-share partner. (2) Project study.--The term ``project study'' means a feasibility report, reevaluation report, or environmental impact statement prepared by the Corps of Engineers. (b) Director of Independent Review.--The Secretary shall appoint in the Office of the Secretary a Director of Independent Review. The Director shall be selected from among individuals who are distinguished experts in engineering, hydrology, biology, economics, or another discipline related to water resources management. The Secretary shall ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that the Director does not have a financial, professional, or other conflict of interest with projects subject to review. The Director of Independent Review shall carry out the duties set forth in this section and such other duties as the Secretary deems appropriate. (c) Sound Project Planning.-- (1) Projects subject to planning review.--The Secretary shall ensure that each project study for a water resources project shall be reviewed by an independent panel of experts established under this subsection if-- (A) the project has an estimated total cost of more than $40,000,000, including mitigation costs; (B) the Governor of a State in which the water resources project is located in whole or in part, or the Governor of a State within the drainage basin in which a water resources project is located and that would be directly affected economically or environmentally as a result of the project, requests in writing to the Secretary the establishment of an independent panel of experts for the project; (C) the head of a Federal agency with authority to review the project determines that the project is likely to have a significant adverse impact on public safety, or on environmental, fish and wildlife, historical, cultural, or other resources under the jurisdiction of the agency, and requests in writing to the Secretary the establishment of an independent panel of experts for the project; or (D) the Secretary determines on his or her own initiative, or shall determine within 30 days of receipt of a written request for a controversy determination by any party, that the project is controversial because-- (i) there is a significant dispute regarding the size, nature, potential safety risks, or effects of the project; or (ii) there is a significant dispute regarding the economic, or environmental costs or benefits of the project. (2) Project planning review panels.-- (A) Project planning review panel membership.--For each water resources project subject to review under this subsection, the Director of Independent Review shall establish a panel of independent experts that shall be composed of not less than 5 nor more than 9 independent experts (including at least 1 engineer, 1 hydrologist, 1 biologist, and 1 economist) who represent a range of areas of expertise. The Director of Independent Review shall apply the National Academy of Science's policy for selecting committee members to ensure that members have no conflict with the project being reviewed, and shall consult with the National Academy of Sciences in developing lists of individuals to serve on panels of experts under this subsection. An individual serving on a panel under this subsection shall be compensated at a rate of pay to be determined by the Secretary, and shall be allowed travel expenses. (B) Duties of project planning review panels.--An independent panel of experts established under this subsection shall review the project study, receive from the public written and oral comments concerning the project study, and submit a written report to the Secretary that shall contain the panel's conclusions and recommendations regarding project study issues identified as significant by the panel, including issues such as-- (i) economic and environmental assumptions and projections; (ii) project evaluation data; (iii) economic or environmental analyses; (iv) engineering analyses; (v) formulation of alternative plans; (vi) methods for integrating risk and uncertainty; (vii) models used in evaluation of economic or environmental impacts of proposed projects; and (viii) any related biological opinions. (C) Project planning review record.-- (i) In general.--After receiving a report from an independent panel of experts established under this subsection, the Secretary shall take into consideration any recommendations contained in the report and shall immediately make the report available to the public on the internet. (ii) Recommendations.--The Secretary shall prepare a written explanation of any recommendations of the independent panel of experts established under this subsection not adopted by the Secretary. Recommendations and findings of the independent panel of experts rejected without good cause shown, as determined by judicial review, shall be given equal deference as the recommendations and findings of the Secretary during a judicial proceeding relating to the water resources project. (iii) Submission to congress and public availability.--The report of the independent panel of experts established under this subsection and the written explanation of the Secretary required by clause (ii) shall be included with the report of the Chief of Engineers to Congress, shall be published in the Federal Register, and shall be made available to the public on the Internet. (D) Deadlines for project planning reviews.-- (i) In general.--Independent review of a project study shall be completed prior to the completion of any Chief of Engineers report for a specific water resources project. (ii) Deadline for project planning review panel studies.-- An independent panel of experts established under this subsection shall complete its review of the project study and submit to the Secretary a report not later than 180 days after the date of establishment of the panel, or not later than 90 days after the close of the public comment period on a draft project study that includes a preferred alternative, whichever is later. The Secretary may extend these deadlines for good cause. (iii) Failure to complete review and report.--If an independent panel of experts established under this subsection does not submit to the Secretary a report by the deadline established by clause (ii), the Chief of Engineers may continue project planning without delay. (iv) Duration of panels.--An independent panel of experts established under this subsection shall terminate on the date of submission of the report by the panel. (E) Effect on existing guidance.--The project planning review required by this subsection shall be deemed to satisfy any external review required by Engineering Circular 1105-2- 408 (31 May 2005) on Peer Review of Decision Documents. (d) Safety Assurance.-- (1) Projects subject to safety assurance review.--The Secretary shall ensure that the construction activities for any flood damage reduction project shall be reviewed by an independent panel of experts established under this subsection if the Director of Independent Review determines that-- (A) project performance is critical to the public health and safety; (B) reliability of project performance under emergency conditions is critical; (C) the project utilizes innovative materials or techniques; or (D) the project design is lacking in redundancy, or the project has a unique construction sequencing or a short or overlapping design construction schedule. (2) Safety assurance review panels.--At the appropriate point in the development of [[Page S7930]] detailed engineering and design specifications for each water resources project subject to review under this subsection, the Director of Independent Review shall establish an independent panel of experts to review and report to the Secretary on the adequacy of construction activities for the project. An independent panel of experts under this subsection shall be composed of not less than 5 nor more than 9 independent experts selected from among individuals who are distinguished experts in engineering, hydrology, or other pertinent disciplines. The Director of Independent Review shall apply the National Academy of Science's policy for selecting committee members to ensure that panel members have no conflict with the project being reviewed. An individual serving on a panel of experts under this subsection shall be compensated at a rate of pay to be determined by the Secretary, and shall be allowed travel expenses. (3) Deadlines for safety assurance reviews.--An independent panel of experts established under this subsection shall submit a written report to the Secretary on the adequacy of the construction activities prior to initiation of physical construction and every two years thereafter until construction activities are completed. The Director of Independent Review may establish an alternate schedule if such schedule would better serve the purposes of assuring public safety, and upon written notification to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives. (4) Safety assurance review record.--After receiving a written report from an independent panel of experts established under this subsection, the Secretary shall take into consideration any recommendations contained in the report and shall immediately make the report available to the public on the internet. The Secretary also shall submit the report to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives. (e) Expenses.-- (1) In general.--The costs of an independent panel of experts established under subsection (c) or (d) shall be a Federal expense and shall not exceed-- (A) $250,000, if the total cost of the project in current year dollars is less than $50,000,000; and (B) 0.5 percent of the total cost of the project in current year dollars, if the total cost is $50,000,000 or more. (2) Waiver.--The Secretary, at the written request of the Director of Independent Review, may waive the cost limitations under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines appropriate. (f) Report.--Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report describing the implementation of this section. (g) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect any authority of the Secretary to cause or conduct a peer review of the engineering, scientific, or technical basis of any water resources project in existence on the date of enactment of this Act. ______