To modify a section relating to a fiscal transparency and prioritization report.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
July 19, 2006
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
July 19, 2006
Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 4683 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 43 - 56. Record Vote Number: 211.
July 19, 2006
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 4683 proposed by Senator Inhofe.
July 19, 2006
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 4683 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 43 - 56. Record Vote Number: 211.
July 19, 2006
Amendment SA 4683 proposed by Senator Inhofe. (consideration: CR S7842-7852; text: CR S7842) To modify a section relating to a fiscal transparency and prioritization report.
July 19, 2006
Amendment SA 4683 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 43 - 56. Record Vote Number: 211.
July 19, 2006
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 4683. Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. Bond) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 728, to provide for the consideration and development of water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, and for other purposes; as follows: Strike section 2004 and insert the following: SEC. 2004. FISCAL TRANSPARENCY AND PRIORITIZATION REPORT. (a) In General.--On the third Tuesday of January of each year beginning January 2008, the Chief of Engineers shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report describing-- (1) the expenditures of the Corps of Engineers for the preceding fiscal year and estimated expenditures for the current fiscal year; and (2) the extent to which each authorized project of the Corps of Engineers meets the national priorities described in subsection (b). (b) National Priorities.-- (1) In general.--The national priorities referred to in subsection (a)(2) are-- (A) to reduce the risk of loss of human life and risk to public safety; (B) to benefit the national economy; (C) to protect and enhance the environment; and (D) to promote the national defense. (2) Evaluation of projects.-- (A) In general.--In evaluating the extent to which a project of the Corps of Engineers meets the national priorities under paragraph (1), the Chief of Engineers-- (i) shall develop a relative rating system that is appropriate for-- (I) each project purpose; and (II) if applicable, multipurpose projects; and (ii) may include an evaluation of projects using additional criteria or subcriteria, if the additional criteria or subcriteria are-- (I) clearly explained; and (II) consistent with the method of evaluating the extent to which a project meets the national priorities under this paragraph. (B) Factors.--The Chief of Engineers shall establish such factors, and assign to the factors such priority, as the Chief of Engineers determines to be appropriate to evaluate the extent to which a project meets the national priorities. (C) Consideration.--In establishing factors under subparagraph (B), the Chief of Engineers may consider-- (i) for evaluating the reduction in the risk of loss of human life and risk to public safety of a project-- (I) the human population protected by the project; (II) current levels of protection of human life under the project; and (III) the risk of loss of human life and risk to public safety if the project is not completed, taking into consideration the existence and probability of success of evacuation plans relating to the project, as determined by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency; (ii) for evaluating the benefit of a project to the national economy-- (I) the benefit-cost ratio, and the remaining benefit- remaining cost ratio, of the project; (II) the availability and cost of alternate transportation methods relating to the project; (III) any applicable financial risk to a non-Federal sponsor of the project; (IV) the costs to State, regional, and local entities of project termination; (V) any contribution of the project with respect to international competitiveness; and (VI) the extent to which the project is integrated with, and complementary to, other Federal, State, and local government programs, projects, and objectives within the project area; (iii) for evaluating the extent to which a project protects or enhances the environment-- (I) for ecosystem restoration projects and mitigation plans associated with other project purposes-- (aa) the extent to which the project or plan restores the natural hydrologic processes of an aquatic habitat; (bb) the significance of the resource to be protected or restored by the project or plan; (cc) the extent to which the project or plan is self- sustaining; and (dd) the cost-effectiveness of the project or plan; and (II) the pollution reduction benefits associated with using water as a method of transportation of goods; and (iv) for evaluating the extent to which a project promotes the national defense-- (I) the effect of the project relating to a strategic port designation; and (II) the reduction of dependence on foreign oil associated with using water as a method of transportation of goods. (c) Contents.--In addition to the information described in subsections (a) and (b), the report shall contain a detailed accounting of the following information: (1) With respect to general construction, information on-- (A) projects currently under construction, including-- (i) allocations to date; (ii) the number of years remaining to complete construction; (iii) the estimated annual Federal cost to maintain that construction schedule; and (iv) a list of projects the Corps of Engineers expects to complete during the current fiscal year; and (B) projects for which there is a signed cost-sharing agreement and completed planning, engineering, and design, including-- (i) the number of years the project is expected to require for completion; and (ii) estimated annual Federal cost to maintain that construction schedule. (2) With respect to operation and maintenance of the inland and intracoastal waterways under section 206 of Public Law 95-502 (33 U.S.C. 1804)-- (A) the estimated annual cost to maintain each waterway for the authorized reach and at the authorized depth; and (B) the estimated annual cost of operation and maintenance of locks and dams to ensure navigation without interruption. (3) With respect to general investigations and reconnaissance and feasibility studies-- (A) the number of active studies; (B) the number of completed studies not yet authorized for construction; (C) the number of initiated studies; and (D) the number of studies expected to be completed during the fiscal year. (4) Funding received and estimates of funds to be received for interagency and international support activities under section 318(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2323(a)). (5) Recreation fees and lease payments. (6) Hydropower and water storage fees. (7) Deposits into the Inland Waterway Trust Fund and the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund. (8) Other revenues and fees collected. (9) With respect to permit applications and notifications, a list of individual permit applications and nationwide permit notifications, including-- (A) the date on which each permit application is filed; (B) the date on which each permit application is determined to be complete; and (C) the date on which the Corps of Engineers grants, withdraws, or denies each permit. (10) With respect to the project backlog, a list of authorized projects for which no funds have been allocated for the 5 preceding fiscal years, including, for each project-- (A) the authorization date; (B) the last allocation date; [[Page S7932]] (C) the percentage of construction completed; (D) the estimated cost remaining until completion of the project; and (E) a brief explanation of the reasons for the delay. ______