To require a cost-benefit analysis of significant proposed realignments or closures of research and development or test and evaluation installations, activities, facilities, laboratories, units, functions, or capabilities of the Air Force.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
August 3, 2006
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
August 3, 2006
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 4864 proposed by Senator Stevens for Senator Nelson FL.(consideration: CR S8703-8705)
August 3, 2006
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 4864 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
August 3, 2006
Amendment SA 4864 proposed by Senator Stevens for Senator Nelson FL. (consideration: CR S8703-8705) To require a cost-benefit analysis of significant proposed realignments or closures of research and development or test and evaluation installations, activities, facilities, laboratories, units, functions, or capabilities of the Air Force.
August 3, 2006
Amendment SA 4864 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent. (text as modified: CR S8704)
August 3, 2006
Text
Submitted
SA 4864. Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Bingaman, and Mr. Domenici) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 5631, making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes; as follows: On page 218, between lines 6 and 7, insert the following: Sec. 8109. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the Secretary of the Air Force shall, not later than March 31, 2007, submit to the congressional defense committees a cost- benefit analysis of significant proposed realignments or closures of research and development or test and evaluation installations, activities, facilities, laboratories, units, functions, or capabilities of the Air Force. The analysis shall include an evaluation of missions served and alternatives considered and of the benefits, costs, risks, and other considerations associated with each such proposed realignment or closure. (b) The prohibition under subsection (a) does not apply to realignment and closure activities carried out in accordance with the final recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission under the 2005 round of defense base closure and realignment. ______