S.Amdt. 4864Senate109th Congress (2005-2007)

To require a cost-benefit analysis of significant proposed realignments or closures of research and development or test and evaluation installations, activities, facilities, laboratories, units, functions, or capabilities of the Air Force.

Submitted August 3, 2006

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

4 earlier actions
Floor Latest Action

Senate amendment submitted

August 3, 2006

View full timeline
Floor

Senate amendment submitted

August 3, 2006

Floor

Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 4864 proposed by Senator Stevens for Senator Nelson FL.(consideration: CR S8703-8705)

August 3, 2006

Floor

Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 4864 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

August 3, 2006

Floor

Amendment SA 4864 proposed by Senator Stevens for Senator Nelson FL. (consideration: CR S8703-8705) To require a cost-benefit analysis of significant proposed realignments or closures of research and development or test and evaluation installations, activities, facilities, laboratories, units, functions, or capabilities of the Air Force.

August 3, 2006

Floor

Amendment SA 4864 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent. (text as modified: CR S8704)

August 3, 2006

Text

Submitted

SA 4864. Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself, Mr. Martinez, Mr.
Bingaman, and Mr. Domenici) submitted an amendment intended to be
proposed by him to the bill H.R. 5631, making appropriations for the
Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007,
and for other purposes; as follows:

On page 218, between lines 6 and 7, insert the following:
Sec. 8109. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the
Secretary of the Air Force shall, not later than March 31,
2007, submit to the congressional defense committees a cost-
benefit analysis of significant proposed realignments or
closures of research and development or test and evaluation
installations, activities, facilities, laboratories, units,
functions, or capabilities of the Air Force. The analysis
shall include an evaluation of missions served and
alternatives considered and of the benefits, costs, risks,
and other considerations associated with each such proposed
realignment or closure.
(b) The prohibition under subsection (a) does not apply to
realignment and closure activities carried out in accordance
with the final recommendations of the Defense Base Closure
and Realignment Commission under the 2005 round of defense
base closure and realignment.
______