To prohibit the use of funds to carry out any project or site-specific location identified in the committee report unless the project is specifically authorized or to carry out an unauthorized appropriation.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 1814 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 25 - 72. Record Vote Number: 243.
July 28, 2009
View full timeline
Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 1814 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 25 - 72. Record Vote Number: 243.
July 28, 2009
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 1814 proposed by Senator McCain to Amendment SA 1813.(consideration: CR S8177-8181; text: CR S8177)
July 28, 2009
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 1814 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 25 - 72. Record Vote Number: 243.
July 28, 2009
Amendment SA 1814 proposed by Senator McCain to Amendment SA 1813. (consideration: CR S8177-8181; text: CR S8177) To prohibit the use of funds to carry out any project or site-specific location identified in the committee report unless the project is specifically authorized or to carry out an unauthorized appropriation.
July 28, 2009
Amendment SA 1814 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 25 - 72. Record Vote Number: 243.
July 28, 2009
Senate amendment submitted
July 27, 2009
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 1814. Mr. McCAIN submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1813 submitted by Mr. Dorgan to the bill H.R. 3183, making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: On page 68, between lines 15 and 16, insert the following: Sec. __. (a) None of the funds appropriated under this Act may be used to carry out-- (1) any project or site-specific location identified in the committee report accompanying this Act unless the project is specifically authorized; or (2) an unauthorized appropriation. (b)(1) In this section, the term ``unauthorized appropriation'' means a ``congressionally directed spending item'' (as defined in rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate)-- (A) that is not specifically authorized by law or Treaty stipulation (unless the appropriation has been specifically authorized by an Act or resolution previously passed by the Senate during the same session or proposed in pursuance of an estimate submitted in accordance with law); or (B) the amount of which exceeds the amount specifically authorized by law or Treaty stipulation (or specifically authorized by an Act or resolution previously passed by the Senate during the same session or proposed in pursuance of an estimate submitted in accordance with law) to be appropriated. (2) For purposes of paragraph (1), an appropriation is not specifically authorized if the appropriation is restricted or directed to, or authorized to be obligated or expended for the benefit of, an identifiable person, program, project, entity, or jurisdiction by earmarking or other specification, whether by name or description, in a manner that is so restricted, directed, or authorized that the appropriation applies only to a single identifiable person, program, project, entity, or jurisdiction, unless the identifiable person, program, project, entity, or jurisdiction to which the restriction, direction, or authorization applies is described or otherwise clearly identified in a law or Treaty stipulation (or an Act or resolution previously passed by the Senate during the same session or in the estimate submitted in accordance with law) that specifically provides for the restriction, direction, or authorization of appropriation for the person, program, project, entity, or jurisdiction. ______