To strike the earmarks for the Save America's Treasure program and to provide criteria for the distribution of grants under that program.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
September 23, 2009
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
September 23, 2009
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 2514 proposed by Senator Feinstein for Senator McCaskill.(consideration: CR S9723-9724, S9725; text: CR S9723)
September 23, 2009
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Motion to table amendment SA 2514 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 72 - 26. Record Vote Number: 294.(consideration: CR S9725)
September 23, 2009
Amendment SA 2514 proposed by Senator Feinstein for Senator McCaskill. (consideration: CR S9723-9724, S9725; text: CR S9723) To strike the earmarks for the Save America's Treasure program and to provide criteria for the distribution of grants under that program.
September 23, 2009
Motion to table amendment SA 2514 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 72 - 26. Record Vote Number: 294. (consideration: CR S9725)
September 23, 2009
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 2514. Mrs. McCASKILL submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2996, making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes; as follows: On page 135, line 2, before the period at the end, insert the following: ``, of which, notwithstanding the chart under the heading `Save America's Treasures' on page 30 of Senate Report 111-38, the entire amount shall be distributed by the Secretary of the Interior in the form of competitive grants on the basis of the following criteria: (1) the collection or historic property must be nationally significant; (2) the collection or historic property must be threatened or endangered; (3) the application must document the urgent preservation or conservation need; (4) projects must substantially mitigate the threat and must have a clear public benefit; (5) the project must be feasible; and (6) the application must document adequately the required non-Federal match'' ______