To require the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Commerce to develop a plan for flying scientific instruments on commercial flights.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 3525 proposed by Senator Rockefeller for Senator Cantwell to Amendment SA 3452.(consideration: CR S1805-1809)
March 22, 2010
View full timeline
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 3525 proposed by Senator Rockefeller for Senator Cantwell to Amendment SA 3452.(consideration: CR S1805-1809)
March 22, 2010
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 3525 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.(text as modified: CR S1808)
March 22, 2010
Amendment SA 3525 proposed by Senator Rockefeller for Senator Cantwell to Amendment SA 3452. (consideration: CR S1805-1809) To require the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Commerce to develop a plan for flying scientific instruments on commercial flights.
March 22, 2010
Amendment SA 3525 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent. (text as modified: CR S1808)
March 22, 2010
Senate amendment submitted
March 16, 2010
Text
Submitted
SA 3525. Ms. CANTWELL submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 3452 proposed by Mr. Rockefeller to the bill H.R. 1586, to impose an additional tax on bonuses received from certain TARP recipients; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: Beginning on page 71, strike line 8 and all that follows through line 8 on page 74, and insert the following: (a) Operation Evaluation Partnership Airport Procedures.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall publish a report, after consultation with representatives of appropriate Administration employee groups, airport operators, air carriers, aircraft manufacturers, and third parties that have received letters of qualification from the Federal Aviation Administration to design and validate required navigation performance flight paths for public use (in this section referred to as ``qualified third parties''), that includes the following: (A) RNP/RNAV operations.--With respect to area navigation and required navigation performance operations, the following: (i) Which of the 35 Operational Evolution Partnership airports identified by the Federal Aviation Administration would benefit from implementation of area navigation procedures alone and which would benefit from implementation of both area navigation and required navigation performance procedures. (ii) The required navigation performance and area navigation operations, including procedures to be developed, certified, and published, necessary to maximize the efficiency and capacity of NextGen commercial operations at each of those airports. (iii) The air traffic control operational changes, which connect the terminal environment and en route airspace, necessary to maximize the efficiency and capacity of NextGen commercial operations at each of those airports. (iv) The number of potential required navigation performance procedures at each of those airports. (v) Of the number of required navigation performance procedures identified under clause (iv) for an airport-- (I) the number of such procedures that would be an overlay of an existing instrument flight procedure and supporting analysis; (II) the number of such procedures that would enable greater use of continuous descent arrivals; and (III) an assessment of the priority for implementation of each such procedure. (vi) The timeline for the Federal Aviation Administration to certify required navigation performance as a precision approach. (B) Coordination and implementation activities.--With respect to the coordination and implementation of required navigation performance procedures, the following: (i) A description of the activities and operational changes and approvals required from the Federal Aviation Administration to coordinate and utilize required navigation performance procedures at the 35 Operational Evolution Partnership airports identified by the Federal Aviation Administration. (ii) A description of the software and database information, such as a current version of the Noise Integrated Routing System or the Integrated Noise Model, that the Administration will need to make available to qualified third parties to enable those third parties to design procedures that will meet the broad range of requirements of the Administration. (C) Implementation plan.--A plan for implementing the required navigation performance procedures identified under subparagraph (A) that establishes-- (i) a clearly defined budget, schedule, project organization, and leadership requirements; (ii) specific steps for implementation and transition; (iii) coordination and communications mechanisms with qualified third parties; (iv) specific procedures for engaging the appropriate Administration employee groups to ensure that human factors, training, and other issues surrounding the adoption of required navigation performance procedures in the en route and terminal environments are addressed; (v) a plan for lifecycle management of required navigation performance procedures-- (I) developed by the Administration; and (II) developed by qualified third parties; (vi) an expedited validation process that allows an air carrier using a required navigation performance procedure validated by the Administration at an airport for a specific model of aircraft to transfer all of the information associated with the use of that procedure to another air carrier for use at the same airport for the same model of aircraft; and (vii) baseline and performance metrics for measuring the Administration's progress in implementing the plan, including the percentage utilization of required navigation performance in the National Airspace System. (D) Internal resource analysis.--An assessment of the internal capabilities of the Federal Aviation Administration with respect to designing and validating required navigation performance procedures, including-- (i) the number of staff working either full or part time on designing required navigation performance procedures; (ii) the number of available staff that can be trained to design required navigation performance procedures, the training required, and the length of that training; and (iii) the number of staff designing and validating required navigation performance procedures that are full-time employees and the number employed through term appointments. (E) Cost/benefit analysis for third-party usage.--An assessment of the costs and benefits of using third parties to assist in the development of required navigation performance procedures. (F) Additional procedures.--A process for the identification, certification, and publication of additional or modified required navigation performance and area navigation procedures that may be required at the 35 Operational Evolution Partnership airports identified by the Federal Aviation Administration in the future. (2) Implementation schedule.--The Administrator shall certify, publish, and implement-- (A) 30 percent of the required navigation performance procedures identified under paragraph (1)(A) within 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act; (B) 60 percent of such procedures within 36 months after the date of the enactment of this Act; and (C) 100 percent of such procedures before January 1, 2014. (b) Expansion of Plan to Other Airports.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall publish a report, after consultation with representatives of appropriate Administration employee groups, airport operators, air carriers, and qualified third parties, that includes a plan for applying the procedures, requirements, criteria, and metrics described in subsection (a)(1) to other airports across the United States. (2) Surveying obstacles surrounding regional airports.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Transportation, shall identify options and possible funding mechanisms for surveying obstacles in the areas around regional airports that can be used as an input to future required navigation performance procedures. (3) Implementation schedule.--The Administrator shall certify, publish, and implement-- (A) 25 percent of the required navigation performance procedures included in the plan required by paragraph (1) at such other airports before January 1, 2015; (B) 50 percent of such procedures at such other airports before January 1, 2016; (C) 75 percent of such procedures at such other airports before January 1, 2017; and (D) 100 percent of such procedures before January 1, 2018. ______