S.Amdt. 4034Senate111th Congress (2009-2011)2nd degree

To address the applicability of certain State authorities with respect to national banks, and for other purposes.

Sponsored by Bob CorkerSen. Bob Corker (R-TN)
Submitted May 13, 2010

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

5 earlier actions
Floor Latest Action

Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 4034 proposed by Senator Corker to Amendment SA 3739.(consideration: CR S3866-3868, S3872; text: CR S3866-3867)

May 18, 2010

View full timeline
Floor

Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 4034 proposed by Senator Corker to Amendment SA 3739.(consideration: CR S3866-3868, S3872; text: CR S3866-3867)

May 18, 2010

Floor

Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 4034 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 43 - 55. Record Vote Number: 154.

May 18, 2010

Floor

Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 4034 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 43 - 55. Record Vote Number: 154.

May 18, 2010

Floor

Amendment SA 4034 proposed by Senator Corker to Amendment SA 3739. (consideration: CR S3866-3868, S3872; text: CR S3866-3867) To address the applicability of certain State authorities with respect to national banks, and for other purposes.

May 18, 2010

Floor

Amendment SA 4034 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 43 - 55. Record Vote Number: 154.

May 18, 2010

Floor

Senate amendment submitted

May 13, 2010

Text

Submitted

SA 4034. Mr. CORKER submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to
amendment SA 3739 proposed by Mr. Reid (for Mr. Dodd (for himself and
Mrs. Lincoln)) to the bill S. 3217, to promote the financial stability
of the United States by improving accountability and transparency in
the financial system, to end ``too big to fail,'' to protect the
American taxpayer by ending bailouts, to protect consumers from abusive
financial services practices, and for other purposes; which was ordered
to lie on the table; as follows:

On page 1315, strike line 18, and all that follows through
page 1325, line 20 and insert the following:
``(B) the State consumer financial law is preempted in
accordance with the legal standards of the decision of the
Supreme Court in Barnett Bank v. Nelson (517 U.S. 25 (1996)),
and any preemption determination under this subparagraph may
be made by a court or by regulation or order of the
Comptroller of the Currency, on a case-by-case basis, in
accordance with applicable law; or
``(C) the State consumer financial law is preempted by a
provision of Federal law other than this title.

[[Page S3758]]

``(2) Savings clause.--This title does not preempt, annul,
or affect the applicability of any State law to any
subsidiary or affiliate of a national bank (other than a
subsidiary or affiliate that is chartered as a national
bank).
``(3) Case-by-case basis.--
``(A) Definition.--As used in this section the term `case-
by-case basis' refers to a determination pursuant to this
section made by the Comptroller concerning the impact of a
particular State consumer financial law on any national bank
that is subject to that law, or the law of any other State
with substantively equivalent terms.
``(B) Consultation.--When making a determination on a case-
by-case basis that a State consumer financial law of another
State has substantively equivalent terms as one that the
Comptroller is preempting, the Comptroller shall first
consult with the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and
shall take the views of the Bureau into account when making
the determination.
``(4) Rule of construction.--This title does not occupy the
field in any area of State law.
``(5) Standards of review.--
``(A) Preemption.--A court reviewing any determinations
made by the Comptroller regarding preemption of a State law
by this title shall assess the validity of such
determinations, depending upon the thoroughness evident in
the consideration of the agency, the validity of the
reasoning of the agency, the consistency with other valid
determinations made by the agency, and other factors which
the court finds persuasive and relevant to its decision.
``(B) Savings clause.--Except as provided in subparagraph
(A), nothing in this section shall affect the deference that
a court may afford to the Comptroller in making
determinations regarding the meaning or interpretation of
title LXII of the Revised Statutes of the United States or
other Federal laws.
``(6) Comptroller determination not delegable.--Any
regulation, order, or determination made by the Comptroller
of the Currency under paragraph (1)(B) shall be made by the
Comptroller, and shall not be delegable to another officer or
employee of the Comptroller of the Currency.
``(c) Substantial Evidence.--No regulation or order of the
Comptroller of the Currency prescribed under subsection
(b)(1)(B), shall be interpreted or applied so as to
invalidate, or otherwise declare inapplicable to a national
bank, the provision of the State consumer financial law,
unless substantial evidence, made on the record of the
proceeding, supports the specific finding regarding the
preemption of such provision in accordance with the legal
standard of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United
States in Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Nelson,
Florida Insurance Commissioner, et al., 517 U.S. 25 (1996).
``(d) Periodic Review of Preemption Determinations.--
``(1) In general.--The Comptroller of the Currency shall
periodically conduct a review, through notice and public
comment, of each determination that a provision of Federal
law preempts a State consumer financial law. The agency shall
conduct such review within the 5-year period after
prescribing or otherwise issuing such determination, and at
least once during each 5-year period thereafter. After
conducting the review of, and inspecting the comments made
on, the determination, the agency shall publish a notice in
the Federal Register announcing the decision to continue or
rescind the determination or a proposal to amend the
determination. Any such notice of a proposal to amend a
determination and the subsequent resolution of such proposal
shall comply with the procedures set forth in subsections (a)
and (b) of section 5244 of the Revised Statutes of the United
States (12 U.S.C. 43 (a), (b)).
``(2) Reports to congress.--At the time of issuing a review
conducted under paragraph (1), the Comptroller of the
Currency shall submit a report regarding such review to the
Committee on Financial Services of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and
Urban Affairs of the Senate. The report submitted to the
respective committees shall address whether the agency
intends to continue, rescind, or propose to amend any
determination that a provision of Federal law preempts a
State consumer financial law, and the reasons therefor.
``(e) Application of State Consumer Financial Law to
Subsidiaries and Affiliates.--Notwithstanding any provision
of this title, a State consumer financial law shall apply to
a subsidiary or affiliate of a national bank (other than a
subsidiary or affiliate that is chartered as a national bank)
to the same extent that the State consumer financial law
applies to any person, corporation, or other entity subject
to such State law.
``(f) Preservation of Powers Related to Charging
Interest.--No provision of this title shall be construed as
altering or otherwise affecting the authority conferred by
section 5197 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (12
U.S.C. 85) for the charging of interest by a national bank at
the rate allowed by the laws of the State, territory, or
district where the bank is located, including with respect to
the meaning of `interest' under such provision.
``(g) Transparency of OCC Preemption Determinations.--The
Comptroller of the Currency shall publish and update no less
frequently than quarterly, a list of preemption
determinations by the Comptroller of the Currency then in
effect that identifies the activities and practices covered
by each determination and the requirements and constraints
determined to be preempted.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter
one of title LXII of the Revised Statutes of the United
States is amended by inserting after the item relating to
section 5136B the following new item:

``Sec. 5136C. State law preemption standards for national banks and
subsidiaries clarified.''.

SEC. 1045. CLARIFICATION OF LAW APPLICABLE TO NONDEPOSITORY
INSTITUTION SUBSIDIARIES.

Section 5136C of the Revised Statutes of the United States
(as added by this subtitle) is amended by adding at the end
the following:
``(i) Clarification of Law Applicable to Nondepository
Institution Subsidiaries and Affiliates of National Banks.--
``(1) Definitions.--For purposes of this subsection, the
terms `depository institution', `subsidiary', and `affiliate'
have the same meanings as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act.
``(2) Rule of construction.--No provision of this title
shall be construed as preempting, annulling, or affecting the
applicability of State law to any subsidiary, affiliate, or
agent of a national bank (other than a subsidiary, affiliate,
or agent that is chartered as a national bank).''.

SEC. 1046. STATE LAW PREEMPTION STANDARDS FOR FEDERAL SAVINGS
ASSOCIATIONS AND SUBSIDIARIES CLARIFIED.

(a) In General.--The Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461
et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 5 the
following new section:

``SEC. 6. STATE LAW PREEMPTION STANDARDS FOR FEDERAL SAVINGS
ASSOCIATIONS CLARIFIED.

``(a) In General.--Any determination by a court or by the
Director or any successor officer or agency regarding the
relation of State law to a provision of this Act or any
regulation or order prescribed under this Act shall be made
in accordance with the laws and legal standards applicable to
national banks regarding the preemption of State law.
``(b) Principles of Conflict Preemption Applicable.--
Notwithstanding the authorities granted under sections 4 and
5, this Act does not occupy the field in any area of State
law.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for the Home
Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461 et seq.) is amended by
striking the item relating to section 6 and inserting the
following new item:

``Sec. 6. State law preemption standards for Federal savings
associations and subsidiaries clarified.''.

SEC. 1047. VISITORIAL STANDARDS FOR NATIONAL BANKS AND
SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS.

(a) National Banks.--Section 5136C of the Revised Statutes
of the United States (as added by this subtitle) is amended
by adding at the end the following:
``(j) Visitorial Powers.--
``(1) In general.--In accordance with the decision of the
Supreme Court of the United States in Cuomo v. Clearing House
Assn., L. L. C., 5 (129 S. Ct. 2710 (2009)), no provision of
this title which relates to visitorial powers or otherwise
limits or restricts the visitorial authority to which any
national bank is subject shall be construed as limiting or
restricting the authority of any attorney general (or other
chief law enforcement officer) of any State to bring an
action in a court of appropriate jurisdiction to enforce an
applicable nonpreempted State law against a national bank, as
authorized by such law, and to seek relief as authorized by
such law.
``(2) Exclusion.--The powers granted to State attorneys
general and State regulators under section 1042 of the
Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 shall not
apply to any national bank, or any subsidiary thereof,
regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
``(k) Enforcement Actions.--The ability of the Comptroller
of the Currency to bring an enforcement action under this
title or section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act does
not preclude any private party from enforcing rights granted
under Federal or State law in the courts.''.
(b) Savings Associations.--Section 6 of the Home Owners'
Loan Act (as added by this title) is amended by adding at the
end the following:
``(c) Visitorial Powers.--The provisions of sections
5136C(j) of the Revised Statutes of the United States shall
apply to Federal savings associations, and any subsidiary
thereof, to the same extent and in the same manner as if such
savings associations, or subsidiaries thereof, were national
banks or subsidiaries of national banks, respectively.
______