S.Amdt. 2109Senate112th Congress (2011-2013)

To revoke the exclusivity of certain entities that are responsible for violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the False Claims Act, and other certain laws.

Submitted May 17, 2012

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

6 earlier actions
Floor Latest Action

Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 2109, under the order of 5/23/12, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 9 - 88. Record Vote Number: 109.

May 24, 2012

View full timeline
Floor

Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 2109, under the order of 5/23/12, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 9 - 88. Record Vote Number: 109.

May 24, 2012

Floor

Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 2109, under the order of 5/23/12, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 9 - 88. Record Vote Number: 109.

May 24, 2012

Floor

Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S3536, S3540-3541, S3543, S3562-3563)

May 24, 2012

Floor

Amendment SA 2109, under the order of 5/23/12, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 9 - 88. Record Vote Number: 109.

May 24, 2012

Floor

Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 2109 proposed by Senator Sanders.(consideration: CR S3485-3488; text: CR S3485-3486)

May 23, 2012

Floor

Amendment SA 2109 proposed by Senator Sanders. (consideration: CR S3485-3488; text: CR S3485-3486) To revoke the exclusivity of certain entities that are responsible for violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the False Claims Act, and other certain laws.

May 23, 2012

Floor

Senate amendment submitted

May 17, 2012

Text

Submitted

SA 2109. Mr. SANDERS submitted an amendment intended to be proposed
by him to the bill S. 3187, to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act to revise and extend the user-fee programs for
prescription drugs and medical devices, to establish user-fee programs
for generic drugs and biosimilars, and for other purposes; which was
ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

At the end of title XI, add the following:

SEC. 11__. CONDITIONS ON AWARD OF DRUG EXCLUSIVITY.

Subchapter E of chapter V (21 U.S.C. 360bbb et seq.) is
amended by inserting after section 569C, as added by this
Act, the following:

``SEC. 569D. CONDITIONS ON AWARD OF DRUG EXCLUSIVITY.

``(a) Termination of Exclusivity.--Notwithstanding any
other provision of this Act, any period of exclusivity
described in subsection (b) granted to a person or assigned
to a person on or after the date of enactment of this section
with respect to a drug shall be terminated if the person to
which such exclusivity was granted or any person to which
such exclusivity is assigned--
``(1) commits a violation described in subsection (c)(1)
with respect to such drug; or
``(2) fails to report such a violation as required by
subsection (e).
``(b) Exclusivities Affected.--The periods of exclusivity
described in this subsection are those periods of exclusivity
granted under any of the following sections:
``(1) Clause (ii), (iii), or (iv) of section 505(c)(3)(E).
``(2) Clause (iv) of section 505(j)(5)(B).
``(3) Clause (ii), (iii), or (iv) of section 505(j)(5)(F).
``(4) Section 505A.
``(5) Section 505E.
``(6) Section 527.
``(7) Section 351(k)(7) of the Public Health Service Act.
``(8) Any other provision of this Act that provides for
market exclusivity (or extension of market exclusivity) with
respect to a drug.
``(c) Violations.--
``(1) In general.--A violation described in this subsection
is a violation of a law described in paragraph (2) that
results in--
``(A) a criminal conviction of a person described in
subsection (a);
``(B) a civil judgment against a person described in
subsection (a); or
``(C) a settlement agreement in which a person described in
subsection (a) admits to fault.
``(2) Laws described.--The laws described in this paragraph
are the following:
``(A) The provisions of this Act that prohibit--
``(i) the adulteration or misbranding of a drug;
``(ii) the making of false statements to the Secretary or
committing fraud; or
``(iii) the illegal marketing of a drug.
``(B) The provisions of subchapter III of chapter 37 of
title 31, United States Code (commonly known as the `False
Claims Act').
``(C) Section 287 of title 18, United States Code.
``(D) The Medicare and Medicaid Patient Protection and
Program Act of 1987 (commonly known as the `Antikickback
Statute').
``(E) Section 1927 of the Social Security Act.
``(F) A State law against fraud comparable to a law
described in subparagraphs (A) through (E).
``(d) Date of Exclusivity Termination.--The date on which
the exclusivity shall be terminated as described in
subsection (a) is the date on which, as applicable--
``(1) a final judgment is entered relating to a violation
described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (c)(1); or
``(2)(A) a settlement agreement described in subsection
(c)(1)(C) is approved by a court order that is or becomes
final and nonappealable; or
``(B) if there is no court order approving a settlement
agreement described in subsection (c)(1)(C), a court order
dismissing the applicable case, issued after the settlement
agreement, is or becomes final and nonappealable.
``(e) Reporting of Information.--A person described in
subsection (a) that commits a violation described in
subsection (c)(1) shall report such violation to the
Secretary no later than 30 days after the date that--
``(1) a final judgment is entered relating to a violation
described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (c)(1); or
``(2)(A) a settlement agreement described in subsection
(c)(1)(C) is approved by a court order that is or becomes
final and nonappealable; or
``(B) if there is no court order approving a settlement
agreement described in subsection (c)(1)(C), a court order
dismissing the applicable case, issued after the settlement
agreement, is or becomes final and nonappealable.''.
______