S.Amdt. 2699Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 2699
Sponsored by
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
Submitted June 11, 2018
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 11, 2018
Text
Submitted
SA 2699. Mr. FLAKE (for himself and Mr. Johnson) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2282 submitted by Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. McCain) and intended to be proposed to the bill H.R. 5515, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2019 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of title X, add the following: Subtitle G--Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act SEC. 1071. SHORT TITLE. This subtitle may be cited as the ``Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act of 2018''. SEC. 1072. HIRING FLEXIBILITY. Section 3 of the Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-376; 6 U.S.C. 221) is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following new subsections: ``(b) Waiver Authority.--The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection may waive the application of subsection (a)(1) in the following circumstances: ``(1) In the case of a current, full-time law enforcement officer employed by a State or local law enforcement agency, if such officer-- ``(A) has served as a law enforcement officer for not fewer than three years with no break in service; ``(B) is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of, or the incarceration of any person for, any violation of law, and has statutory powers for arrest or apprehension; ``(C) is not currently under investigation, has not been found to have engaged in criminal activity or serious misconduct, has not resigned from a law enforcement officer position under investigation or in lieu of termination, and has not been dismissed from a law enforcement officer position; and ``(D) has, within the past ten years, successfully completed a polygraph examination as a condition of employment with such officer's current law enforcement agency. ``(2) In the case of a current, full-time Federal law enforcement officer, if such officer-- ``(A) has served as a law enforcement officer for not fewer than three years with no break in service; ``(B) has authority to make arrests, conduct investigations, conduct searches, make seizures, carry firearms, and serve orders, warrants, and other processes; ``(C) is not currently under investigation, has not been found to have engaged in criminal activity or serious misconduct, has not resigned from a law enforcement officer position under investigation or in lieu of termination, and has not been dismissed from a law enforcement officer position; and ``(D) holds a current Tier 4 background investigation or current Tier 5 background investigation. ``(3) In the case of an individual who is a member of the Armed Forces (or a reserve component thereof) or a veteran, if such individual-- ``(A) has served in the Armed Forces for not fewer than three years; ``(B) holds, or has held within the past five years, a Secret, Top Secret, or Top Secret / Sensitive Compartmented Information clearance; ``(C) holds, or has undergone within the past five years, a current Tier 4 background investigation or current Tier 5 background investigation; ``(D) received, or is eligible to receive, an honorable discharge from service in the Armed Forces and has not engaged in criminal activity or committed a serious military or civil offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; and ``(E) was not granted any waivers to obtain the clearance referred to subparagraph (B). ``(c) Termination of Waiver Authority.--The authority to issue a waiver under subsection (b) shall terminate on the date that is four years after the date of the enactment of the Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act of 2018.''. SEC. 1073. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMISSIONER AUTHORITY AND DEFINITIONS. (a) Supplemental Commissioner Authority.--Section 4 of the Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-376) is amended to read as follows: ``SEC. 4. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMISSIONER AUTHORITY. ``(a) Non-exemption.--An individual who receives a waiver under subsection (b) of section 3 is not exempt from other hiring requirements relating to suitability for employment and eligibility to hold a national security designated position, as determined by the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection. ``(b) Background Investigations.--Any individual who receives a waiver under subsection (b) of section 3 who holds a current Tier 4 background investigation shall be subject to a Tier 5 background investigation. ``(c) Administration of Polygraph Examination.--The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection is authorized to administer a polygraph examination to an applicant or employee who is eligible for or receives a waiver under subsection (b) of section 3 if information is discovered prior to the completion of a background investigation that results in a determination that a polygraph examination is necessary to make a final determination regarding suitability for employment or continued employment, as the case may be.''. (b) Report.--The Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ``SEC. 5. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. ``(a) Annual Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of the Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act of 2018, and annually thereafter while the waiver authority under section 3(b) is in effect, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall submit a report to Congress that includes, with respect to the reporting period-- [[Page S3695]] ``(1) the number of waivers requested, granted, and denied under section 3(b); ``(2) the reasons for any denials of such waiver; ``(3) the percentage of applicants who were hired after receiving a waiver; ``(4) the number of instances that a polygraph was administered to an applicant who initially received a waiver and the results of such polygraph; ``(5) an assessment of the current impact of the polygraph waiver program on filling law enforcement positions at U.S. Customs and Border Protection; and ``(6) additional authorities needed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to better utilize the polygraph waiver program for its intended goals. ``(b) Additional Information.--The first report submitted under subsection (a) shall include-- ``(1) an analysis of other methods of employment suitability tests that detect deception and could be used in conjunction with traditional background investigations to evaluate potential employees for suitability; and ``(2) a recommendation regarding whether a test referred to in paragraph (1) should be adopted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection when the polygraph examination requirement is waived pursuant to section 3(b).''. (c) Definitions.--The Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010, as amended by subsection (b) of this section, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section: ``SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS. ``In this Act: ``(1) Federal law enforcement officer.--The term `Federal law enforcement officer' means a `law enforcement officer', as defined in section 8331(20) or 8401(17) of title 5, United States Code. ``(2) Veteran.--The term `veteran' has the meaning given such term in section 101(2) of title 38, United States Code. ``(3) Serious military or civil offense.--The term `serious military or civil offense' means an offense for which-- ``(A) a member of the Armed Forces may be discharged or separated from service in the Armed Forces; and ``(B) a punitive discharge is, or would be, authorized for the same or a closely related offense under the Manual for Courts-Martial, as pursuant to Army Regulation 635-200 chapter 14-12. ``(4) Tier 4; tier 5.--The terms `Tier 4' and `Tier 5' with respect to background investigations have the meaning given such terms under the 2012 Federal Investigative Standards.''. ______