S.Amdt. 3386Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 3386
Sponsored by
Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE)
Submitted June 28, 2018
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 28, 2018
Text
Submitted
SA 3386. Mr. SASSE submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 3224 proposed by Mr. Roberts (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) to the bill H.R. 2, to provide for the reform and continuation of agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of subtitle D of title II, add the following: SEC. 24__. GAO STUDY ON NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE DETERMINATIONS OF PROGRAM INELIGIBILITY. (a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study of the coordination between the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Farm Service Agency to determine-- (1) the number of producers that were determined to be ineligible for Department of Agriculture benefits as a result of noncompliance with applicable requirements under conservation programs (referred to in this section as ``applicable conservation requirements''); (2) in any case in which a producer was determined not to be in compliance with an applicable conservation requirement, the penalties enforced against the producer; (3) the total number of acres determined not to be in compliance with applicable conservation requirements; (4) applicable procedures to ensure producers can work with the Natural Resources Conservation Service to bring the acres of the producers into compliance with applicable conservation requirements; (5) the coordination between county and State offices with respect to evaluation of compliance with applicable conservation requirements; and (6)(A) the means by which the Natural Resources Conservation Service determines which tracts of land to evaluate for compliance with applicable conservation requirements; and (B) whether a random order of selection is the most efficient way to evaluate whether producers are achieving compliance with applicable conservation requirements. (b) Components.--The study under subsection (a) shall include-- (1) an evaluation of the appeals process relating to determinations of ineligibility for Federal programs, including a review, during the 5-year period ending on the date on which the study is commenced, of those appeals brought to the National Appeals Division; and (2) the development of recommendations, taking into consideration affected watersheds, regions, counties, and adjacent landowners, to improve efficiency in the management of Federal resources relating to producer compliance with applicable conservation requirements. ______