H.Res. 803House108th Congress (2003-2005)Passed Congress

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3193) to restore second amendment rights in the District of Columbia.

Introduced September 28, 2004

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

9 earlier actions
HouseFloor Latest Action

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

September 29, 2004 • 11:34 AM

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

September 28, 2004

HouseCommittee

The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 108-707, by Mr. Hastings (WA).

September 28, 2004

HouseFloor

Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3193 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.

September 28, 2004 • 8:21 PM

HouseCalendars

Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 232.

September 28, 2004

HouseFloor

Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H7741-7749)

September 29, 2004 • 10:38 AM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 803.

September 29, 2004 • 10:39 AM

HouseFloor

The previous question was ordered without objection.

September 29, 2004 • 11:34 AM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7741)

September 29, 2004 • 11:34 AM

HouseFloor

On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7741)

September 29, 2004 • 11:34 AM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

September 29, 2004 • 11:34 AM

Floor Debate

22 members

What members said about H.Res. 803 on the floor

7 Republicans15 Democrats
Mark E. Souder
Rep. Mark E. SouderR-IN-3 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 803, I call up the bill (H.R. 3193) to restore second amendment rights in the District of Columbia, and ask for its immediate consideration. Mr. Speaker, I…

James P. McGovern
Rep. James P. McGovernD-MA-3 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Washington for yielding me the customary 30 minutes, and I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the so-called District…

Eleanor Holmes Norton
Rep. Eleanor Holmes NortonD-DC · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I am compelled to begin by noting the ludicrous logic on which this debate has already begun. The gentleman from Indiana (Mr.…

Eleanor Holmes Norton
Rep. Eleanor Holmes NortonD-DC · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time. Mr. Speaker, when this law was first introduced, it was simply regarded as another absurd piece of legislation. There are lots of them…

Louise McIntosh Slaughter
Rep. Louise McIntosh SlaughterD-NY-28 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this rule and this bill. The rule before us is a closed rule allowing only 60 minutes of debate and prohibits consideration of all the Democratic amendments…

Show 8 more
Chris Van Hollen
Rep. Chris Van HollenD-MD-8 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I am proud to join today with my colleague, the gentlewoman from the neighboring congressional district, the District of Columbia (Ms. Norton), in opposing this bill. The District of…

Mark E. Souder
Rep. Mark E. SouderR-IN-3 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, first I would like to thank the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Hastings) for bringing up a very good rule today. I rise in support of this rule, and would like to alert all of my…

Mike Ross
Rep. Mike RossD-AR-4 · Sep 29, 2004

I yield to the gentleman from Oklahoma. (Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.) Mr. Speaker, reclaiming my time, I rise today and join 43 of my…

Albert Russell Wynn
Rep. Albert Russell WynnD-MD-4 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the rule; and more importantly, I rise in opposition to the underlying bill. When I looked at this bill, I was compelled to ask the question of the supporters of…

Elijah E. Cummings
Rep. Elijah E. CummingsD-MD-7 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the District of Columbia Personal Protection Act, H.R. 3193, an outrageous effort spearheaded by my friend Representative Souder of Indiana, to repeal the ban on…

Ron Paul
Rep. Ron PaulR-TX-14 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of House Resolution 3193, the District of Columbia Personal Protection Act. I am a cosponsor of this legislation that ensures greater respect for the right to bear arms…

Doc Hastings
Rep. Doc HastingsR-WA-4 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 803 and ask for its immediate consideration. Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of debate only, I yield the customary 30…

Rush Holt
Rep. Rush HoltD-NJ-12 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to express my strong opposition to H.R. 3193, the so-called District of Columbia Personal Protection Act. I do not agree with the premise that more hand guns and assault…

Show 11 more
Jesse L. Jackson, Jr.
Rep. Jesse L. Jackson, Jr.D-IL-2 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, first. In addition to violating the Republicans' ``sacred oath'' to support ``states' rights;'' this body is violating the citizens of the District of Columbia's right to…

Mark Udall
Rep. Mark UdallD-CO-2 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I cannot support this bill, which would repeal a number of local laws adopted by the District of Columbia City Council and would prohibit the passage of similar local laws in the future.…

Fortney Pete Stark
Rep. Fortney Pete StarkD-CA-13 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in outraged opposition to H.R. 3193, the so-called District of Columbia Personal Protection Act. This bill strips away gun safety laws passed by the City Council here in our…

Sam Graves
Rep. Sam GravesR-MO-6 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, while we ultimately are debating two different gun control bans in the District of Columbia, I am going to confine my comments to the District's ban on the acquisition or possession of a…

John Linder
Rep. John LinderR-GA-7 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I thank my friend from the Committee on Rules, the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Hastings), for the time. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H. Res. 803, a closed rule that provides for…

Patrick J. Kennedy
Rep. Patrick J. KennedyD-RI-1 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I never could have thought I would see it, a House that is run by a conservative majority that is bent on imposing its will on the minority. We have seen it many times, but, Mr. Speaker,…

Henry A. Waxman
Rep. Henry A. WaxmanD-CA-30 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this bill. The other side would have you believe that they want to repeal legislation in the District of Columbia to stop handguns. But that is not what this bill…

Phil Gingrey
Rep. Phil GingreyR-GA-11 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Washington State, the distinguished member of the Committee on Rules, for yielding me this time, and I want to thank my colleague, the gentleman from Indiana…

Tom Davis
Rep. Tom DavisR-VA-11 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to H.R. 3193, and I respect the gentleman from Indiana's perspective on this issue. I think there is room in the House for disagreement. But my opposition is…

Lincoln Davis
Rep. Lincoln DavisD-TN-4 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, without a doubt, the provisions of the District of Columbia's gun laws that have the most adverse effect upon the largest number of law-abiding District residents, are the ban on using…

James P. Moran
Rep. James P. MoranD-VA-8 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to legislation that has been introduced to usurp the District of Columbia's home rule and greatly exacerbate an already very serious gun violence problem here…

Bill Text

2 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Engrossed in HouseIssued September 29, 2004
        [Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 803 Engrossed in House (EH)]

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 29, 2004.
Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill
(H.R. 3193) to restore second amendment rights in the District of Columbia. The
bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment printed in the
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be
considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on
the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1)
one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Government Reform;
and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
Attest:

Clerk.