H.R. 222House109th Congress (2005-2007)In Committee

Human Cloning Research Prohibition Act

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds to conduct or support research on the cloning of humans, and to express the sense of the Congress that other countries should establish substantially equivalent restrictions.

Introduced January 4, 2005

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

3 earlier actions
HouseCommittee Latest Action

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

February 4, 2005

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

January 4, 2005

HouseIntro Referral

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E18)

January 4, 2005

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

January 4, 2005

HouseCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

February 4, 2005

Floor Debate

1 member

What members said about H.R. 222 on the floor

1 Republican
Cliff Stearns
Rep. Cliff StearnsR-FL-6 · Mar 1, 2005

Mr. Speaker, last month a U.N. committee approved a resolution calling on nations quickly to adopt and implement legislation ``to prohibit all forms of human cloning inasmuch as they are incompatible…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued January 4, 2005

I

109th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 222

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 4, 2005

Mr. Stearns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds to conduct or support research on the cloning of humans, and to express the sense of the Congress that other countries should establish substantially equivalent restrictions.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Human Cloning Research Prohibition Act.

2.

Prohibition against expenditure of Federal funds for research on cloning humans

(a)

Prohibition

None of the funds made available in any Federal law may be obligated or expended to conduct or support any project of research that includes the use of human somatic cell nuclear transfer technology to produce an oocyte that is undergoing cell division toward development of a fetus.

(b)

Definitions

For purposes of this section—

(1)

the term human somatic cell nuclear transfer means transferring the nucleus of a human somatic cell into an oocyte from which the nucleus has been removed or rendered inert; and

(2)

the term somatic cell means a cell of an embryo, fetus, child, or adult which is not and will not become a sperm or egg cell.

3.

Review

The Director of the National Science Foundation shall enter into an agreement with the National Research Council for a review of the implementation of this Act. Not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall transmit to the Congress a report containing the results of that review, including the conclusions of the National Research Council on—

(1)

the impact that the implementation of this Act has had on research; and

(2)

recommendations for any appropriate changes to this Act.

4.

Protected scientific research

Nothing in this Act shall restrict other areas of scientific research not specifically prohibited by this Act, including important and promising work that involves—

(1)

the use of somatic cell nuclear transfer or other cloning technologies to clone molecules, DNA, cells other than human embryo cells, or tissues; or

(2)

the use of somatic cell nuclear transfer techniques to create animals other than humans.

5.

Sense of Congress regarding international prohibition

It is the sense of the Congress that each foreign country should establish a prohibition substantially equivalent to the prohibition established in section 2(a).