H.Res. 295House111th Congress (2009-2011)Failed

Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

Sponsored by Jeff FlakeRep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
Introduced March 30, 2009

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

4 earlier actions
HouseFloor Latest Action

On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 173, 13 Present (Roll no. 163).

March 30, 2009 • 7:11 PM

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

March 30, 2009

HouseFloor

Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H4100-4101; text of measure as introduced: CR H4100)

March 30, 2009 • 6:45 PM

HouseFloor

QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE - Mr. Flake rose to a question of the privileges of the House and offered a resolution. The Chair directed the Clerk to report the resolution. The Clerk completed the reading of H.Res. 295 and the Chair announced that the resolution met the required threshold under the rule.

March 30, 2009 • 6:46 PM

HouseFloor

Mr. Miller, George moved to table the measure.

March 30, 2009 • 6:49 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 173, 13 Present (Roll no. 163).

March 30, 2009 • 7:11 PM

Floor Debate

5 members

What members said about H.Res. 295 on the floor

4 Republicans1 Democrat
Scott Garrett
Rep. Scott GarrettR-NJ-5 · Jan 14, 2009

Madam Speaker, I rise today in recognition of Korean-American Day, which was celebrated yesterday. Korean Americans have played an essential part in shaping our country into its current form. Ever…

Timothy V. Johnson
Rep. Timothy V. JohnsonR-IL-15 · Apr 28, 2009

Madam Speaker, unfortunately last night, April 27, 2009, I was unable to cast my votes on H. Res. 329, H.R. 1746, and H. Res. 335 and wish the Record to reflect my intentions had I been able to vote.…

Timothy V. Johnson
Rep. Timothy V. JohnsonR-IL-15 · Mar 31, 2009

Madam Speaker, on March 30, 2009, I was unable to cast my votes on the Motion to Table H. Res. 295, H.R. 20, and H.R. 479 and wish the record to reflect my intentions had I been able to vote. Had I…

J. Gresham Barrett
Rep. J. Gresham BarrettR-SC-3 · Mar 31, 2009

Madam Speaker, unfortunately I missed recorded votes on the House floor on Monday, March 30, 2009. Had I been present, I would have voted ``Present'' on rollcall vote No. 163 (on motion to table H.…

Jeff Flake
Rep. Jeff FlakeR-AZ-6 · Mar 30, 2009

Mr. Speaker, I rise to a question of the privileges of the House and offer the resolution previously noticed. Mr. Speaker, I object to the vote on the ground that a quorum is not present and make the…

Show 1 more
George Miller
Rep. George MillerD-CA-7 · Mar 30, 2009

Mr. Speaker, I move to lay the resolution on the table.

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Laid on Table in HouseIssued March 30, 2009

IV

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. RES. 295

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 30, 2009

Mr. Flake submitted the following resolution; which was laid on the table

RESOLUTION

Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas The Hill reported that a prominent lobbying firm specializing in obtaining defense earmarks for its clients, the subject of a federal investigation into potentially corrupt political contributions, has given $3.4 million in political donations to no less than 284 Members of Congress;

Whereas multiple press reports have noted questions related to campaign contributions made by or on behalf of the firm; including questions related to straw man contributions, the reimbursement of employees for political giving, pressure on clients to give, a suspicious pattern of giving, and the timing of donations relative to legislative activity;

Whereas Roll Call has taken note of the timing of contributions from employees of the firm and its clients when it reported that they have provided thousands of dollars worth of campaign contributions to key Members in close proximity to legislative activity, such as the deadline for earmark request letters or passage of a spending bill.;

Whereas CQ Today specifically noted a Member getting $25,000 in campaign contribution money from [the founder of the firm] and his relatives right after his subcommittee approved its spending bill in 2005.;

Whereas the Associated Press noted that Members received campaign contributions from employees of the firm around the time they requested earmarks for companies represented by the firm;

Whereas the Associated Press highlighted the huge amounts of political donations from the firm and its clients to select Members and noted that those political donations have followed a distinct pattern: The giving is especially heavy in March, which is prime time for submitting written earmark requests.;

Whereas clients of the firm received at least three hundred million dollars worth of earmarks in fiscal year 2009 appropriations legislation, including several that were approved even after news of the FBI raid of the firm’s offices and Justice Department investigation into the firm was well known;

Whereas the Associated Press reported that the FBI says the investigation is continuing, highlighting the close ties between special-interest spending provisions known as earmarks and the raising of campaign cash.; and

Whereas the persistent media attention focused on questions about the nature and timing of campaign contributions related to the firm, as well as reports of the Justice Department conducting research on earmarks and campaign contributions, raise concern about the integrity of Congressional proceedings and the dignity of the institution: Now, therefore, be it

That—

(1)

the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, or a subcommittee of the committee designated by the committee and its members appointed by the chairman and ranking member, shall immediately begin an investigation into the relationship between the source and timing of past campaign contributions to Members of the House related to the raided firm and earmark requests made by Members of the House on behalf of clients of the raided firm; and

(2)

the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct shall submit a report of its findings to the House of Representatives within 2 months after the date of adoption of the resolution.