H.R. 2639House116th Congress (2019-2021)Passed House

Strength in Diversity Act of 2020

Introduced May 9, 2019

AI-Generated Summary

Updated April 14, 2026 at 5:14 AM UTC

The Strength in Diversity Act of 2020 creates a federal grant program to help public schools—early‑childhood, elementary and secondary—reduce racial and socioeconomic isolation. The Department of Education can award planning and implementation grants to state, local, or regional education agencies and consortia that develop strategies such as changing school boundaries, weighted lotteries, transportation plans, or teacher recruitment to increase diversity. Grants are awarded competitively, with priority given to entities that have previously applied for related programs or propose multi‑district or housing‑coordinated solutions, and recipients must report on student outcomes and diversity gains.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes the Secretary of Education to reserve up to 5% of grant funds for national research and best‑practice development, and up to 10% for state planning grants.
  • Allows competitive planning grants (up to 1 year) and implementation grants (up to 3 years, extendable by 2 years) to eligible entities that serve schools with significant achievement gaps and segregation.
  • Sets grant‑award criteria based on application quality, expected impact on student outcomes, and potential to reduce racial/economic isolation; priority is given to prior applicants, programs targeting racial isolation, multi‑district efforts, and coordination with housing agencies.
  • Requires planning grant recipients to assess current segregation, develop community‑engaged strategies (e.g., boundary redesign, weighted lotteries), and build data capacity; implementation grants fund actions like hiring diverse staff, creating transportation plans, and innovative enrollment systems.
  • Mandates performance measures tracking academic achievement, graduation, readiness, and reductions in isolation, plus annual reporting on progress and sustainability.
  • Defines “covered schools” as publicly funded early‑childhood programs, public elementary schools, and public secondary schools, and outlines eligible entities (state, local, consortium, or regional education agencies).

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

26 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

September 16, 2020

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

May 9, 2019

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.

May 9, 2019

HouseCommittee

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

May 16, 2019

HouseCommittee

Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 20.

May 16, 2019

HouseCommittee

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Labor. H. Rept. 116-496.

September 8, 2020

HouseCalendars

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 397.

September 8, 2020

HouseFloor

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1107 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2574, H.R. 2639, H.R. 2694 and H. Res. 908. Provides for one hour of debate on each measure. The previous question will be considered as ordered on each measure without intervening motions except for one motion to recommit with or without instructions on H.R. 2574, H.R. 2639, and H.R. 2694.

September 14, 2020 • 3:37 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1107. (consideration: CR H4400-4414)

September 15, 2020 • 1:13 PM

HouseFloor

Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2574, H.R. 2639, H.R. 2694 and H. Res. 908. Provides for one hour of debate on each measure. The previous question will be considered as ordered on each measure without intervening motions except for one motion to recommit with or without instructions on H.R. 2574, H.R. 2639, and H.R. 2694.

September 15, 2020 • 1:13 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2639.

September 15, 2020 • 1:17 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1107, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Torres (CA) amendment No. 1.

September 15, 2020 • 2:09 PM

HouseFloor

Without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table.

September 15, 2020 • 2:13 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1107, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Allen amendment No. 2.

September 15, 2020 • 2:13 PM

HouseFloor

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Allen amendment, the Chair put the question on the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Allen demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on agreeing to the amendment until a time to be announced.

September 15, 2020 • 2:22 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1107, the House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Fudge en bloc amendment No. 1.

September 15, 2020 • 2:23 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1107, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Dean amendment No. 6.

September 15, 2020 • 2:37 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1107, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moulton amendment No. 9.

September 15, 2020 • 2:47 PM

HouseFloor

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Moulton amendment, the Chair put the question on the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Foxx (NC) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on agreeing to the amendment until a time to be announced.

September 15, 2020 • 2:57 PM

HouseFloor

UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinihsed business was on agreeing to the Allen amendment No. 2, which was debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.

September 15, 2020 • 2:58 PM

HouseFloor

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair announced that pursant to clause 1(c) of Rule XIX, further consideration of H.R. 2639 is postponed.

September 15, 2020 • 3:53 PM

HouseFloor

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4414-4416)

September 15, 2020 • 4:02 PM

HouseFloor

UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on the Moulton amendment No. 9, which was debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.

September 15, 2020 • 4:02 PM

HouseFloor

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

September 15, 2020 • 4:51 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 248 - 167 (Roll no. 189).

September 15, 2020 • 5:30 PM

HouseFloor

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 248 - 167 (Roll no. 189).

September 15, 2020 • 5:30 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

September 15, 2020 • 5:31 PM

SenateIntro Referral

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

September 16, 2020

Amendments

6 amendments

Offered to this bill

H.Amdt. 880Sep 15, 2020

Amendment to expand the allowable uses of implementation grants to include creating or improving a one-stop enrollment process for students with multiple public school options, including making school information and data more accessible and easier to understand.

On agreeing to the Moulton amendment (A006) Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 379 - 34 (Roll no. 188). · Sponsored by Seth Moulton

H.Amdt. 879Sep 15, 2020

An amendment numbered 6 printed in Part B of House Report 116-502 to ensure that State Education Agencies have procedures in place to assess and prevent the redrawing of school district lines in a manner that increases racial or socioeconomic isolation.

On agreeing to the Dean amendment (A005) Agreed to by voice vote. · Sponsored by Madeleine Dean

H.Amdt. 878Sep 15, 2020

Amendments en bloc comprised of the following amendments printed in Part B of House Report 116-502 as en bloc No. 1: Nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12.

On agreeing to the Fudge amendments (A004) Agreed to by voice vote. · Sponsored by Marcia L. Fudge

H.Amdt. 877Sep 15, 2020

Amendment to provide school districts flexibility with their funds under the Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants to carry out integration activities.

On agreeing to the Allen amendment (A003) Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 171 - 243 (Roll no. 187). · Sponsored by Rick W. Allen

H.Amdt. 876Sep 15, 2020

An amendment numbered 1 printed in Part B of House Report 116-502 to add new criteria for evaluating grant applications, factoring in the impact of the likelihood the grant will lead to a meaningful reduction in racial and economic isolation for children in schools. The amendment also prioritizes entities that coordinate with local housing agencies to integrate schools that serve a disproportionately low number of low-income students.

On agreeing to the Torres (CA) amendment (A002) Agreed to by voice vote. · Sponsored by Norma J. Torres

H.Amdt. 875Sep 15, 2020

Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1107, the amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 116-62 is adopted.

On agreeing to the Rules amendment (A001) Agreed to by voice vote.

Bill Text

4 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Referred in SenateIssued September 16, 2020

IIB

116th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 2639

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

September 16, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

AN ACT

To establish the Strength in Diversity Program, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Strength in Diversity Act of 2020.

2.

Purpose

The purpose of this Act is to support the development, implementation, and evaluation of comprehensive strategies to address the effects of racial isolation or concentrated poverty by increasing diversity, including racial diversity and socioeconomic diversity, in covered schools.

3.

Reservation for national and state activities

(a)

National activities

The Secretary may reserve not more than 5 percent of the amounts made available under section 10 for a fiscal year to carry out activities of national significance relating to this Act, which may include—

(1)

research, development, data collection, monitoring, technical assistance, evaluation, or dissemination activities; and

(2)

the development and maintenance of best practices for recipients of grants under section 4 and other experts in the field of school diversity.

(b)

State activities

The Secretary may reserve not more than 10 percent of the amounts made available under section 10 for a fiscal year for planning grants and implementation grants made to State educational agencies under section 4.

4.

Grant program authorized

(a)

Authorization

(1)

In general

From the amounts made available under section 10 and not reserved under section 3 for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall award grants in accordance with subsection (b) to eligible entities to develop or implement plans to improve diversity and reduce or eliminate racial or socioeconomic isolation in covered schools.

(2)

Types of grants

The Secretary may, in any fiscal year, award—

(A)

planning grants to carry out the activities described in section 6(a);

(B)

implementation grants to carry out the activities described in section 6(b); or

(C)

both such planning grants and implementation grants.

(b)

Award basis

(1)

Criteria for evaluating applications

The Secretary shall award grants under this section on a competitive basis, based on—

(A)

the quality of the application submitted by an eligible entity under section 5;

(B)

the likelihood, as determined by the Secretary, that the eligible entity will use the grant to improve student outcomes or outcomes on other performance measures described in section 7; and

(C)

the likelihood that the grant will lead to a meaningful reduction in racial and economic isolation for children in covered schools.

(2)

Priority

In awarding grants under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to the following eligible entities:

(A)

First, to an eligible entity that submitted an application for a grant under the Opening Doors, Expanding Opportunities program described in the notice published by the Department of Education in the Federal Register on December 14, 2016 (81 Fed. Reg. 90343 et seq.).

(B)

Second, to an eligible entity that proposes, in an application submitted under section 5, to use the grant to support a program that addresses racial isolation.

(C)

Third, to an eligible entity that proposes, in an application submitted under section 5, to use the grant to support a program that extends beyond one local educational agency, such as an inter-district or regional program.

(D)

Fourth, to an eligible entity that demonstrates meaningful coordination with local housing agencies to increase access to schools that have a disproportionately low number of low-income students.

(c)

Duration of grants

(1)

Planning grant

A planning grant awarded under this section shall be for a period of not more than 1 year.

(2)

Implementation grant

An implementation grant awarded under this section shall be for a period of not more than 3 years, except that the Secretary may extend an implementation grant for an additional 2-year period if the eligible entity receiving the grant demonstrates to the Secretary that the eligible entity is making significant progress, as determined by the Secretary, on the program performance measures described in section 7.

5.

Applications

In order to receive a grant under section 4, an eligible entity shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may require. Such application shall include—

(1)

a description of the program for which the eligible entity is seeking a grant, including—

(A)

how the eligible entity proposes to use the grant to improve the academic and life outcomes of students in racial or socioeconomic isolation in covered schools by supporting interventions that increase diversity for students in such covered schools;

(B)

in the case of an implementation grant, the implementation grant plan described in section 6(b)(1); and

(C)

evidence, or if such evidence is not available, a rationale based on current research, regarding how the program will increase diversity;

(2)

in the case of an eligible entity proposing to use any of the grant to benefit covered schools that are racially isolated, a description of how the eligible entity will identify and define racial isolation;

(3)

in the case of an eligible entity proposing to use any portion of the grant to benefit high-poverty covered schools, a description of how the eligible entity will identify and define income level and socioeconomic status;

(4)

a description of the plan of the eligible entity for continuing the program after the grant period ends;

(5)

a description of how the eligible entity will assess, monitor, and evaluate the impact of the activities funded under the grant on student achievement and student enrollment diversity;

(6)

an assurance that the eligible entity has conducted, or will conduct, robust parent and community engagement, while planning for and implementing the program, such as through—

(A)

consultation with appropriate officials from Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations approved by the Tribes located in the area served by the eligible entity;

(B)

consultation with other community entities, including local housing or transportation authorities;

(C)

public hearings or other open forums to inform the development of any formal strategy to increase diversity; and

(D)

outreach to parents and students, in a language that parents and students can understand, and consultation with students and families in the targeted district or region that is designed to ensure participation in the planning and development of any formal strategy to increase diversity;

(7)

an estimate of the number of students that the eligible entity plans to serve under the program and the number of students to be served through additional expansion of the program after the grant period ends;

(8)

an assurance that the eligible entity will—

(A)

cooperate with the Secretary in evaluating the program, including any evaluation that might require data and information from multiple recipients of grants under section 4; and

(B)

engage in the best practices developed under section 3(2);

(9)

an assurance that, to the extent possible, the eligible entity has considered the potential implications of the grant activities on the demographics and student enrollment of nearby covered schools not included in the activities of the grant;

(10)

in the case of an eligible entity applying for an implementation grant, a description of how the eligible entity will—

(A)

implement, replicate, or expand a strategy based on a strong or moderate level of evidence (as described in subclause (I) or (II) of section 8101(21)(A)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(21)(A)(i))); or

(B)

test a promising strategy to increase diversity in covered schools;

(11)

in the case of an application by a consortium of local educational agencies, a specification of which agency is the lead applicant, and how the grant funds will be divided among the school districts served by such consortium; and

(12)

in the case of an application by a State education agency, a demonstration that the agency has procedures in place—

(A)

to assess and prevent the redrawing of school district lines in a manner that increases racial or socioeconomic isolation;

(B)

to assess the segregation impacts of new school construction proposals and to prioritize school construction funding that will foreseeably increase racial and economic integration; and

(C)

to include progress toward reduction of racial and economic isolation as a factor in its State plan under section 1111 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311).

6.

Uses of funds

(a)

Planning grants

Each eligible entity that receives a planning grant under section 4 shall use the grant to support students in covered schools through the following activities:

(1)

Completing a comprehensive assessment of, with respect to the geographic area served by such eligible entity—

(A)

the educational outcomes and racial and socioeconomic stratification of children attending covered schools;

(B)

an analysis of the location and capacity of program and school facilities and the adequacy of local or regional transportation infrastructure; and

(C)

teacher diversity in covered schools, and plans for expanding teacher diversity.

(2)

Developing and implementing a robust family, student, and community engagement plan, including, where feasible, public hearings or other open forums that would precede and inform the development of a formal strategy to improve diversity in covered schools.

(3)

Developing options, including timelines and cost estimates, for improving diversity in covered schools, such as weighted lotteries, revised feeder patterns, school boundary redesign, or regional coordination.

(4)

Developing an implementation plan based on community preferences among the options developed under paragraph (3).

(5)

Building the capacity to collect and analyze data that provide information for transparency, continuous improvement, and evaluation.

(6)

Developing an implementation plan to comply with a court-ordered school desegregation plan.

(7)

Engaging in best practices developed under section 3(2).

(8)

If applicable, developing an implementation plan to replace entrance exams or other competitive application procedures with methods of student assignment to promote racial and socioeconomic diversity.

(b)

Implementation grants

(1)

Implementation grant plan

Each eligible entity that receives an implementation grant under section 4 shall implement a high-quality plan to support students in covered schools that includes—

(A)

a comprehensive set of strategies designed to improve academic outcomes for all students, particularly students of color and low-income students, by increasing diversity in covered schools;

(B)

evidence of strong family and community support for such strategies, including evidence that the eligible entity has engaged in meaningful family and community outreach activities;

(C)

goals to increase diversity in covered schools over the course of the grant period;

(D)

collection and analysis of data to provide transparency and support continuous improvement throughout the grant period; and

(E)

a rigorous method of evaluation of the effectiveness of the program.

(2)

Implementation grant activities

Each eligible entity that receives an implementation grant under section 4 may use the grant to carry out one or more of the following activities:

(A)

Recruiting, hiring, or training additional teachers, administrators, school counselors, and other instructional and support staff in new, expanded, or restructured covered schools, or other professional development activities for staff and administrators.

(B)

Investing in specialized academic programs or facilities designed to encourage inter-district school attendance patterns.

(C)

Developing or initiating a transportation plan for bringing students to and from covered schools, if such transportation is sustainable beyond the grant period and does not represent a significant portion of the grant received by an eligible entity under section 4.

(D)

Developing innovative and equitable school assignment plans.

(E)

Carrying out innovative activities designed to increase racial and socioeconomic school diversity and engagement between children from different racial, economic, and cultural backgrounds.

(F)

Creating or improving systems and partnerships to create a one-stop enrollment process for students with multiple public school options, including making school information and data more accessible and easy to understand, in order to ensure access to low poverty or high-performing schools for low-income children and to promote racial and socioeconomic diversity.

7.

Performance measures

The Secretary shall establish performance measures for the programs and activities carried out through a grant under section 4. These measures, at a minimum, shall track the progress of each eligible entity in—

(1)

improving academic and other developmental or noncognitive outcomes for each subgroup described in section 1111(b)(2)(B)(xi) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)(B)(xi)) that is served by the eligible entity on measures, including, as applicable, by—

(A)

increasing school readiness;

(B)

increasing student achievement and decreasing achievement gaps;

(C)

increasing high school graduation rates;

(D)

increasing readiness for postsecondary education and careers;

(E)

improving access to mental health and social-emotional learning;

(F)

reducing school discipline rates; and

(G)

any other indicator the Secretary or eligible entity may identify; and

(2)

increasing diversity and decreasing racial or socioeconomic isolation in covered schools.

8.

Annual reports

An eligible entity that receives a grant under section 4 shall submit to the Secretary, at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may require, an annual report that includes—

(1)

a description of the efforts of the eligible entity to increase inclusivity;

(2)

information on the progress of the eligible entity with respect to the performance measures described in section 7;

(3)

the data supporting such progress;

(4)

a description of how the eligible entity will continue to make improvements toward increasing diversity and decreasing racial or socioeconomic isolation in covered schools and sustaining inclusion; and

(5)

information on the progress of regional programs on reducing racial and socioeconomic isolation in covered schools, if applicable.

9.

Applicability

Section 426 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1228) shall not apply with respect to activities carried out under a grant under this Act.

10.

Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2020 and each of the 5 succeeding fiscal years.

11.

Definitions

In this Act:

(1)

Covered school

The term covered school means—

(A)

a publicly-funded early childhood education program;

(B)

a public elementary school; or

(C)

a public secondary school.

(2)

Eligible entity

The term eligible entity means a State educational agency, a local educational agency, a consortium of such agencies, an educational service agency, or regional educational agency that at the time of the application of such eligible entity has significant achievement gaps and socioeconomic or racial segregation within or between the school districts served by such entity.

(3)

ESEA terms

The terms educational service agency, elementary school, local educational agency, secondary school, Secretary, and State educational agency have the meanings given such terms in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).

(4)

Publicly-funded early childhood education program

The term publicly-funded early childhood education program means an early childhood education program (as defined in section 103(8) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1003(8)) that receives State or Federal funds.

Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 2020.

Cheryl L. Johnson,

Clerk