S. 98Senate119th Congress (2025-2027)Enacted

Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025

Introduced January 15, 2025

AI-Generated Summary

Updated April 22, 2026 at 3:41 AM UTC

The Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025 directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to create a vetting process for any new high‑cost universal service fund awards that support broadband deployment in rural areas. The goal is to ensure that applicants have the technical, financial, and operational capacity to build and operate broadband networks before receiving federal money.

Key Provisions

  • The FCC must start a rulemaking proceeding within 180 days of the law’s enactment to establish the vetting process.
  • Applicants for new high‑cost funding must submit detailed proposals showing they have the technical expertise, financial resources, operational ability, and a realistic business plan to deploy broadband as promised.
  • The FCC will evaluate proposals against established technical, financial, and operational standards and consider the applicant’s past compliance with broadband funding programs.
  • Penalties for failing to meet the pre‑authorization requirements are set at a minimum of $9,000 per violation and must be at least 30% of the total support awarded, unless the FCC can justify a lower amount.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

17 earlier actions
Became Law Latest Action

Became Public Law No: 119-89.

May 11, 2026

View full timeline
SenateIntro Referral

Introduced in Senate

January 15, 2025

SenateIntro Referral

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

January 15, 2025

SenateCommittee

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

February 5, 2025

SenateCommittee

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz without amendment. With written report No. 119-14.

April 28, 2025

SenateCalendars

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 48.

April 28, 2025

SenateFloor

Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S3570; text: CR S3570)

June 26, 2025

SenateFloor

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

June 27, 2025

HouseFloor

Received in the House.

July 3, 2025 • 2:32 PM

HouseFloor

Held at the desk.

July 3, 2025 • 2:32 PM

HouseFloor

Mr. Allen moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

April 20, 2026 • 4:51 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2976-2978)

April 20, 2026 • 4:51 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 98.

April 20, 2026 • 4:51 PM

SenateFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2977)

April 20, 2026 • 4:58 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2977)

April 20, 2026 • 4:58 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

April 20, 2026 • 4:58 PM

President

Presented to President.

April 30, 2026

Became Law

Signed by President.

May 11, 2026

Became Law

Became Public Law No: 119-89.

May 11, 2026

Floor Debate

4 members

What members said about S. 98 on the floor

3 Republicans1 Democrat
Erin Houchin
Rep. Erin HouchinR-IN-9 · Apr 20, 2026

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of S. 98, the Rural Broadband Protection Act, a bill I authored and passed out of the House as H.R. 2399 and an issue I have long championed. In April, we…

Rick W. Allen
Rep. Rick W. AllenR-GA-12 · Apr 20, 2026

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (S. 98) to require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a vetting process for prospective applicants for high-cost universal…

Jennifer L. McClellan
Rep. Jennifer L. McClellanD-VA-4 · Apr 20, 2026

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of S. 98, the Senate companion to H.R. 2399, or the Rural Broadband Protection Act, which passed the House in…

Jon Husted
Sen. Jon HustedR-OH · Jun 26, 2025

Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No. 48, S. 98. The clerk will report the bill by title. I ask unanimous consent that the…

Bill Text

5 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Enrolled BillPublication date not provided

One Hundred Nineteenth Congress of the United States of America

2d Session

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Saturday, the third day of January, two thousand and twenty six

S. 98

AN ACT

To require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a vetting process for prospective applicants for high-cost universal service program funding.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025.

2.

Vetting process for prospective high-cost universal service fund applicants

Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(m)

Vetting of high-Cost fund recipients

(1)

Definitions

In this subsection—

(A)

the term covered funding means any new offer of high-cost universal service program funding, including funding provided through a reverse competitive bidding mechanism provided under this section, for the deployment of a broadband-capable network and the provision of supported services over the network; and

(B)

the term new covered funding award means an award of covered funding that is made based on an application submitted to the Commission on or after the date on which rules are promulgated under paragraph (2).

(2)

Commission rulemaking

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Commission shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding to establish a vetting process for applicants for, and other recipients of, a new covered funding award.

(3)

Contents

(A)

In general

In promulgating rules under paragraph (2), the Commission shall provide that, consistent with principles of technology neutrality, the Commission will only award covered funding to applicants that can demonstrate that they meet the qualifications in subparagraph (B).

(B)

Qualifications described

An applicant for a new covered funding award shall include in the initial application a proposal containing sufficient detail and documentation for the Commission to ascertain that the applicant possesses the technical, financial, and operational capabilities, and has a reasonable business plan, to deploy the proposed network and deliver services with the relevant performance characteristics and requirements defined by the Commission and as pledged by the applicant.

(C)

Evaluation of proposal

The Commission shall evaluate a proposal described in subparagraph (B) against—

(i)

reasonable and well-established technical, financial, and operational standards, including the technical standards adopted by the Commission in orders of the Commission relating to Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection (WC Docket No. 19–195) (or orders of the Commission relating to modernizing any successor collection) for purposes of entities that must report broadband availability coverage; and

(ii)

the applicant’s history of complying with requirements in Commission and other government broadband deployment funding programs.

(D)

Penalties for pre-authorization defaults

In adopting rules for any new covered funding award, the Commission shall set a penalty for pre-authorization defaults of at least $9,000 per violation and may not limit the base forfeiture to an amount less than 30 percent of the applicant’s total support, unless the Commission demonstrates the need for lower penalties in a particular instance.

.

Speaker of the House of Representatives

Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate