Well, I think one of the things that people always overlook is the cost of patient safety on our health care delivery system. The Institutes of Medicine, which is the foremost authority in terms of independent, nonpartisan medical research…
Well, I think one of the things that people always overlook is the cost of patient safety on our health care delivery system. The Institutes of Medicine, which is the foremost authority in terms of independent, nonpartisan medical research has looked at this in three studies they did in the last decade there: patient safety treatise on to err is human; their patient safety study; and also their study of medication errors. Their conclusions were interesting because they concluded that the cost of preventable medical errors on our health care system every year is between $17 and $28 billion of preventable medical errors. That's the added cost in additional health care that's imposed on people who are injured due to preventable medical errors.
So if you multiply those numbers over the 10-year life of this bill that's being scored by CBO, you're looking at an opportunity cost loss by not focusing on patient safety of somewhere between $170 and $280 billion. That's why patient safety should be the primary focus of any health care reform, and that's what the Institute of Medicine concluded.
That is why when we were coming up with a solution to the enormous problem of over-utilization in certain parts of the country--it's a well-known problem--it costs, according to medical economists, somewhere between $500 and $700 billion a year, which would be $5 to $7 trillion over the 10-year period that's being scored by CBO. You could pay for everything in this health care bill five to seven times with those types of savings.
Well, they don't because they don't have the opportunity to look at what portion of those would be directly related to Medicare, Medicaid patient and the cost shifting that takes place when we ask other people to carry the burden of fixing those problems.
But I want to focus more on what's in the photograph next to you, because we stand on this floor every day and talk about policy.
To a lot of people policy is vague. It's hard to understand. It's complex. But you, Dr. Kagen, have put a human face
on health care. I want to spend just a few minutes talking about the human drama of health care that nobody seems to really be talking about.
When I was out at my 17 town hall meetings in my district this summer and people were complaining about this health care bill and who was going to benefit from it, I would always bring them back to the human side of health care. I would talk about my nephew's 18-month-old son, Tucker Wright, who lives in Malcom, Iowa.
Tucker was 18 months old when he was diagnosed with liver cancer. He had two-thirds of his liver removed. He faces a very uncertain medical future. The medical costs, as you know better than anyone, Dr. Kagen, were astronomical from that surgery and from the followup and from the constant monitoring that has to be done on a young patient with such a serious medical condition. He is almost certain to get another form of cancer before he reaches the age of 18.
His parents are the classic example of what we want responsible adults to do. They are both employed in full-time employment. They had health insurance coverage. But with a lifetime cap on benefits in most private health insurance policies available now, his parents are locked into jobs that they cannot leave. If they do, under our current health care delivery model, they will be denied future payments for his health care needs, which are enormous, because of something called preexisting condition exclusions.
It's more than that, because I have attended fund-raisers for this adorable little boy, because even with good health insurance, they have tens of thousands of dollars of uninsured and underinsured health care needs. You have seen that human drama play out, and I would like you to talk about the toll that that takes on the families that you cared for in Wisconsin.
I think one of the things we have been talking about is how you put a human face on complex health care policy. When we were out in our districts, we got a lot of feedback about the public health insurance option and people saying don't do anything to disrupt our private health insurance system.
I had a recent meeting with a young woman, 20 years old, Hannah Rodriguez is her name. She is a student at the University of Northern Iowa in my district. She sat down to interview me, and one of the first things I noticed about her is she had a cleft palate, 20 years old in the United States of America. She was so excited because she said she was soon going to have her final surgery to fix her cleft palate.
I said to her, Well, what's taken so long for you to get this surgery? She says, Well, my mom and dad don't make much money and they have been saving up money to have this surgery done. I said, Well, why isn't this covered under your health insurance? Your folks have health insurance, don't they? She said, Yes, but this is considered cosmetic surgery.
Think about that. A young woman, for 20 years, born with a birth defect, just like cystic fibrosis, just like cerebral palsy, all of which are covered under a regular health insurance policy, and this young woman has been struggling with this for 20 years. That's why we have to fix this broken health care system.