Deficit Reduction Act Of 2005
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to this legislation. Mr. Speaker, there is so much wrong with this legislation that I do not know where to begin. This ``deficit reduction act'' is a tool for the majority party to justify their tax…
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to this legislation.
Mr. Speaker, there is so much wrong with this legislation that I do not know where to begin.
This ``deficit reduction act'' is a tool for the majority party to justify their tax cuts that are poorly timed and do not benefit the American citizens who need help the most. It is irresponsible to cut funding for vital programs in order to make up for lost revenues due to tax cuts that benefit the wealthy. If we do not fix this deficit, we are forcing future generations to pay for Congress's fiscal irresponsibility. There are no useful deficit reduction measures in this bill.
This budget reconciliation bill cuts essential government programs that serve the most vulnerable members of our society. Society and government are judged by how we take care of those in need and we must do better. All totaled, the bill cuts spending by $53.9 billion dollars which includes cuts to Medicaid, Food Stamps, student loans, and child support.
The cuts to the Medicaid program total $11.9 billion or 22 percent of all of the cuts in this legislation. These cuts will result in premium increases for all participants and a reduction in benefits that will cause millions of children to lose some preventative and treatment services. At a time when health concerns are at the forefront of many people's minds, we should not be making cuts to Medicaid that will make it harder for people to afford the care they need.
The cuts to the Food Stamp Program total $844 million dollars. These cuts would be the result of new limitations on who is qualified to receive food stamps. Under this legislation, some families receiving other types of federal assistance would be ineligible to receive food stamps. It is outrageous that we are cutting this and other programs that have been proven to help those who are the most in need.
The reductions in funding to child support programs total $4.9 billion or 9 percent of all of the cuts in this legislation. This is just plain wrong. States rely on this funding to aid their efforts in establishing and enforcing child support orders; orders that are necessary if families and children are ever going to receive the support owed to them.
According to the Census Bureau for the most recent year that data is available (2001), only 45 percent of custodial parents have received the full amount of child support owed to them. There are an estimated 13.4 million parents with custody of 21.5 million children under age 21 whose other parent lives elsewhere. About 5-in-6 of those 13.4 million parents are mothers.
Twenty-five percent of single mothers with children in the United States are below the poverty level. We must do all that we can to
help mothers and their children receive the child support that is owed to them. Cutting funding to States for child support enforcement is obviously moving in the wrong direction.
As Members of Congress we cannot continue to allow ill-timed and badly targeted tax cuts for the wealthy while at the same time cutting government programs that help people improve the quality of their lives and their wellbeing.
If we continue along this path we will be shortchanging our children, our grandchildren and their children to come. They will inherit a government and a country that turned its back on the people who needed them most and they will be forced to pick up the pieces.
We cannot let this happen. I am committed to serving the people of the Second District of Maryland and I will not support legislation such as this that will negatively impact my constituents or the United States as a whole.
This legislation is just plain wrong and I urge my colleagues to oppose the bill.