Mr. President, I thank my colleague, the distinguished Senator from Iowa, for his years of effort and leadership and focus on this issue. I rise this morning to join with Senator Harkin in introducing this amendment to S. 1248, the…
Mr. President, I thank my colleague, the distinguished Senator from Iowa, for his years of effort and leadership and focus on this issue.
I rise this morning to join with Senator Harkin in introducing this amendment to S. 1248, the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, IDEA, reauthorization. Our amendment will provide mandatory increases in funding of $2.2 billion per year to fully fund part B of the IDEA Program over the next 6 years.
This amendment will allow us to reach our Federal funding commitment to IDEA by fiscal year 2010 and fulfill our nearly 30-year-old Federal commitment to the States, our schools, our children with disabilities.
In 1975, Congress guaranteed children with disabilities the right to a free and appropriate public education. This means whatever the cost, States and local school districts are mandated by Federal law to provide necessary services to educate a child with a disability. Congress understood this Federal mandate would be costly. As a result, Congress agreed over 30 years ago to provide States with 40 percent of the cost of educating these children. Unfortunately, States have been bearing the bulk of the costs associated with IDEA for this time. States have upheld their part of the deal. Congress has not. This is why Senator Harkin and I and others believe mandatory funding is warranted for the IDEA Program.
IDEA is one of the largest unfunded mandates imposed on the States. As a matter of fact, I recall in a speech on the Senate floor earlier this year the junior Senator from Tennessee, the former Governor of Tennessee, Mr. Alexander, talking about unfunded mandates that he dealt with in his 8 years as Governor of Tennessee. He pointed out specifically that IDEA was one of those unfunded mandates.
Everyone in this body has heard from their Governors, school boards, administrators, teachers and parents about the importance of this issue. Unfortunately, instead of making IDEA funding a priority, Congress continues to pass new education programs that require more money, more resources, and more responsibility from the States. So we continue to force down upon the States, more unfunded mandates. Even though the purpose is noble, the cause is right, and we say on the floor of the Congress that we will help, we will provide those resources and those funds--in the case of IDEA, for 30 years we have not done that. We have not fulfilled the statutory commitments that we made to the States and the school districts--and ultimately to our children.
For the past 7 years, I have worked on a bipartisan basis with Senators Harkin, Dodd, Kennedy, Jeffords, Warner, Collins, Chafee, Snowe, Coleman, Roberts, and others to accomplish this task. Three years ago, as was noted by my distinguished colleague from Iowa, the Senate agreed to an amendment that Senator Harkin and I offered to the No Child Left Behind Act. The amendment provided mandatory funding for the IDEA program. Unfortunately, this amendment was removed during a House-Senate conference in 2001.
Today we have another opportunity to show the Senate's support for mandatory IDEA funding by passing the Harkin-Hagel amendment. Although we have had great success in increasing IDEA appropriations from $2.3 billion in fiscal year 1996 to $10.1 billion in fiscal year 2004, we still have a long way to go before meeting our total Federal IDEA funding responsibilities. The cost of special education is high. We understand that. But it is the thing that is most important for the parents, the teachers, and the children. By underfunding the Federal Government's portion of IDEA, States and local school districts are forced to pick up the additional costs, adding to their already heavy tax burdens.
Our amendment has nothing to do with expanding the Federal role. It has nothing to do with expanding the Federal role in education. It is about meeting the existing commitments of the Federal Government under the current law.
While I share the same budgetary concerns as others in this body--we all
must share those concerns and act as prudent, wise stewards of the people's money--I remind my colleagues that despite our recent progress on IDEA, we are still only about halfway to meeting our Federal obligation that we made to the people of this country 30 years ago. We are not now meeting those statutory commitments. Although we made budget promises year after year, we continue to fail in meeting our annual discretionary funding goals for IDEA.
Last year the Senate adopted a budget amendment that would have increased IDEA funds by $2.2 billion in fiscal year 2004. Unfortunately, we came up $1 billion short, even though we had passed it in the Senate, by the time we finished the appropriations process. This is just another example of why mandatory funding is absolutely necessary to fulfill the commitment of Congress to IDEA. Meeting our Federal commitment to IDEA would help school districts fund additional education priorities such as facility improvements, teacher salaries, and purchasing upgraded hardware and software for the classroom.
On another point that needs some clarification, the Harkin-Hagel amendment, this amendment that we debate this morning, would not take away the authority of Congress to reauthorize this program. There seems to be some misunderstanding about that issue. In fact, our amendment includes language that states that nothing shall prevent future reauthorizations.
I urge my colleagues to vote today to fulfill America's commitment to IDEA funding. I yield the floor.