Back to Craig Thomas

Voting Record

Complete voting history for Craig Thomas

Total Votes

1501

Yea Votes

825

55%

Nay Votes

623

42%

Bills Passed

751

50% success rate

VoteVote:
ResultResult:
CongressCongress:
Reset

Showing 50 of 1501 votes

S.Amdt. 143failedMar 14, 2005

To restore funding for education programs that are cut and reduce debt by closing corporate tax loopholes.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 143 to S.Con.Res. 18 (No short title on file)

109th Congress•Roll Call #45
Nay
S. 256passedMar 10, 2005

Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005

On Passage of the Bill S. 256

109th Congress•Roll Call #44
Yea
S. 250passedMar 10, 2005

Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006

On Passage of the Bill S. 250

109th Congress•Roll Call #43
Yea
S.Amdt. 121agreedMar 10, 2005

To deter corporate fraud and prevent the abuse of State self-settled trust law.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 121 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #42
Yea
S.Amdt. 129failedMar 10, 2005

To limit the exemption for asset protection trusts.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 129 to S.Amdt. 121 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #41
Nay
S.Amdt. 112agreedMar 10, 2005

To protect disabled veterans from means testing in bankruptcy under certain circumstances.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 112 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #40
Yea
S.Amdt. 83failedMar 10, 2005

To modify the definition of disinterested person in the Bankruptcy Code.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 83 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #39
Nay
S.Amdt. 105failedMar 10, 2005

To limit claims in bankruptcy by certain unsecured creditors.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 105 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #38
Nay
S.Amdt. 69failedMar 10, 2005

To amend the definition of current monthly income.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 69 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #37
Nay
S.Amdt. 70failedMar 10, 2005

To exempt debtors whose financial problems were caused by failure to receive alimony or child support, or both, from means testing.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 70 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #36
Nay
S.Amdt. 68failedMar 9, 2005

To provide a maximum amount for a homestead exemption under State law.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 68 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #35
Nay
S.Amdt. 67failedMar 9, 2005

To modify the bill to protect families, and for other purposes.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 67 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #34
Nay
S.Amdt. 62failedMar 9, 2005

To provide for the potential disallowance of certain claims.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 62 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #33
Nay
S.Amdt. 66failedMar 9, 2005

To increase the accrual period for the employee wage priority in bankruptcy.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 66 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #32
Nay
S.Amdt. 110failedMar 9, 2005

To clarify that the means test does not apply to debtors below median income.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 110 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #31
Nay
S.Amdt. 89failedMar 8, 2005

To strike certain small business related bankruptcy provisions in the bill.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 89 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #30
Nay
S. 256agreedMar 8, 2005

Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005

On the Cloture Motion S. 256

109th Congress•Roll Call #29
Yea
S.Amdt. 128failedMar 7, 2005

To promote job creation, family time, and small business preservation in the adjustment of the Federal minimum wage.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 128 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #27
Yea
S.Amdt. 44failedMar 7, 2005

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide for an increase in the Federal minimum wage.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 44 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #26
Nay
S.Amdt. 49failedMar 3, 2005

To protect employees and retirees from corporate practices that deprive them of their earnings and retirement savings when a business files for bankruptcy.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 49 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #25
Nay
S.Amdt. 24failedMar 3, 2005

To amend the wage priority provision and to amend the payment of insurance benefits to retirees.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 24 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #24
Nay
S.Amdt. 42failedMar 3, 2005

To limit the exemption for asset protection trusts.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 42 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #23
Nay
S.Amdt. 38failedMar 3, 2005

To discourage predatory lending practices.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 38 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #22
Nay
S.Amdt. 37failedMar 3, 2005

To exempt debtors from means testing if their financial problems were caused by identity theft.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 37 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #21
Nay
S.Amdt. 31failedMar 3, 2005

To limit the amount of interest that can be charged on any extension of credit to 30 percent.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 31 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #20
Nay
S.Amdt. 32failedMar 2, 2005

To preserve existing bankruptcy protections for individuals experiencing economic distress as caregivers to ill or disabled family members.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 32 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #18
Nay
S.Amdt. 29failedMar 2, 2005

To provide protection for medical debt homeowners.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 29 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #17
Nay
S.Amdt. 28failedMar 2, 2005

To exempt debtors whose financial problems were caused by serious medical problems from means testing.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 28 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #16
Nay
S.Amdt. 15failedMar 2, 2005

To require enhanced disclosure to consumers regarding the consequences of making only minimum required payments in the repayment of credit card debt, and for other purposes.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 15 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #15
Nay
S.Amdt. 17failedMar 2, 2005

To provide a homestead floor for the elderly.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 17 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #14
Nay
S.Amdt. 23agreedMar 1, 2005

To clarify the safe harbor with respect to debtors who have serious medical conditions or who have been called or ordered to active duty in the Armed Forces and low income veterans.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 23 to S. 256 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #12
Yea
S. 306passedFeb 17, 2005

Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2005

On Passage of the Bill S. 306

109th Congress•Roll Call #11
Yea
S. 5passedFeb 10, 2005

Class Action Fairness Act of 2005

On Passage of the Bill S. 5

109th Congress•Roll Call #9
Yea
S.Amdt. 12failedFeb 10, 2005

To establish time limits for action by Federal district courts on motions to remand cases that have been removed to Federal court.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 12 to S. 5 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #8
Nay
S.Amdt. 4failedFeb 9, 2005

To clarify the application of State law in certain class actions, and for other purposes.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 4 to S. 5 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #7
Nay
S.Amdt. 5agreedFeb 9, 2005

To exempt class action lawsuits brought by the attorney general of any State from the modified civil procedures required by this Act.

On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 5 to S. 5 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

109th Congress•Roll Call #5
Yea
S. 2845agreedDec 8, 2004

Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004

On the Conference Report S. 2845

108th Congress•Roll Call #216
Yea
H.R. 4818agreedNov 20, 2004

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005

On the Conference Report H.R. 4818

108th Congress•Roll Call #215
Yea
H.R. 1047agreedNov 19, 2004

Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2004

On the Cloture Motion H.R. 1047

108th Congress•Roll Call #214
Yea