Personal Responsibility, Work, And Family Promotion Act Of 2003
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding me this time. Mr. Chairman, I have always been told that when you begin with a faulty premise, you are likely to end up with a faulty conclusion. When you continue to give large, multiyear tax cuts to…
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding me this time.
Mr. Chairman, I have always been told that when you begin with a faulty premise, you are likely to end up with a faulty conclusion. When you continue to give large, multiyear tax cuts to the most wealthy, how in the world do you expect to have enough real money to provide temporary assistance for needy families? When you allow companies to incorporate out of the country to avoid paying legitimate taxes, how in the world do you expect to have money for temporary assistance to needy families? When you give away billions of dollars in subsidies to agricultural and other big business interests, how in the world do you expect to have money to provide day care for children while their parents go to school or go out and look for a job?
The fact of the matter, Mr. Chairman, is that poverty is on the rise and the need for public assistance is on the rise, while this bill will not do anything in the world to really slow it down or to help people get out of it. We know that TANF has not done enough to address the needs of the most vulnerable in our society. Reductions in poverty come as a result of economic growth. We know that more than 2 million people lost their jobs last year. We know that many people who get jobs through TANF end up working at low-income poverty wages, mired down at a level where they will never get out.
I support the Cardin amendment. I support the Lee-Kucinich amendment. It is really our best hope. Reforming and reauthorizing a TANF program that not only takes people off welfare, but also takes people out of poverty should be the focus of this Congress, not simply passing a neatly packaged pig in a flight bag and calling it a welfare program.
Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to join in strong support of this amendment in tribute to Patsy Mink. But more importantly, I support this amendment because it speaks more directly to the needs of needy families than H.R. 4, families who need opportunities for education and training, families who need access to jobs.
Mr. Chairman, 75 percent of all new jobs in this country are found in areas where most people needing assistance do not live. They must have access. We all know how effective early childhood education has been. And yet while we have money for early childhood education, it is not nearly enough. We need to increase that part of it so no child is left behind. I support the Kucinich-Lee amendment.