Mr. Chair, I thank the gentleman for yielding and for his leadership and compassion about this extremely important issue. Mr. Chair, I must rise in opposition to the gentlewoman's amendment. While I know she has the best of intentions, I…
Mr. Chair, I thank the gentleman for yielding and for his leadership and compassion about this extremely important issue.
Mr. Chair, I must rise in opposition to the gentlewoman's amendment. While I know she has the best of intentions, I want to be very practical about my opposition to this. The reality is the amendment will not alleviate the suffering of the Cuban people, quite the contrary. In fact, it may exacerbate their pain by simply enriching a tyrannical regime who uses violence and repression to keep their cruel grip on power.
On a day in which we just heard from the First Lady of Ukraine, who is obviously experiencing what the brunt of repression means from a brutal dictator, we certainly should not be caving to brutal dictatorship in the Western Hemisphere.
The dictatorship in Cuba controls all trade on the island, and, in turn, uses resources to oppress its own people.
The current cash-in-advance requirement for the financing of agricultural exports to Cuba ensures that the regime in Cuba cannot benefit from loans or credit, and that its corrupt, military-run financial institutions are not intertwined with American financial institutions.
Please, anyone within the sound of my voice needs to understand that this amendment allows U.S. persons to invest in Cuban agricultural businesses, even if those businesses are involved in trafficking and confiscated property, as defined in the LIBERTAD Act, which is law, even if the business is controlled by the Government of Cuba, the Cuban military, or any other entity. It is inexplicable to me how we could allow that.
It is also important to point out that unlimited quantities of food, medicine, and other basic necessities are already permitted into Cuba both for sale and through humanitarian donations.
And as the Biden administration has done, the best way to lift up the Cuban people is to support their efforts for democratic reform and mount pressure for release of hundreds of arbitrarily detained political prisoners, including 20 children.
Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to vote against this amendment and support liberty all over the world.
Mr. Chair, I thank the gentlewoman for yielding.
With great respect for my friend from Massachusetts, I rise in strong opposition to these amendments.
I spend every day in my work as chair of the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Subcommittee protecting and improving the lives of our Nation's veterans. I vigorously oppose privatization, so much so that I voted against the VA MISSION Act, in which the AIR Commission appeared as part of that law, because of my concern about sending veterans who might end up remaining permanently in community care.
This en bloc contains two amendments to the MILCON-VA division that would eliminate funding for the AIR Commission at the Department of Veterans Affairs. This independent commission was established by the VA MISSION Act to develop recommendations to modernize and realign VA health facilities so we can best meet the needs of our Nation's veterans.
The reality is that the VA has different infrastructure needs today than it did decades ago. Not only are most VA facilities over 60 years old, but the veteran population has also shifted geographically over time.
The draft market assessments VA has developed and will continue to fine-tune are essential to ensure that VA's facility footprint meets veterans' needs where they are physically located today, not where most veterans were over 60 years ago. We can't ignore these changes and also effectively meet the current needs of our veterans.
We cannot just cancel the Commission and pretend the problem doesn't exist or need to be addressed. We all care about veterans and, since we do, we should be focused together on making sure they have state-of- the-art facilities that are designed to modern standards and are best- positioned to serve them.
The point of VA's market assessments is to identify the current, true needs of our veterans in each market, and the AIR Commission will then review those assessments and make final recommendations to the President and to the Congress. They come back to Congress after these market assessments and recommendations are made.
The funding in this bill does not implement the recommendations. I repeat. The funding in this bill does not implement the recommendations.
We all, on both sides of the aisle, consistently talk about meeting the needs of our veterans. Making sure veterans have access to high- quality care in high-quality facilities is a priority we all share. Adjusting the landscape of our facilities to meet veterans where they live today is key to meeting the needs of our veterans.
If we want to make sure that we don't move further toward privatized healthcare for our veterans, we need to make sure that there are VA facilities that are convenient for them, or that they are eligible by law to go into community care if there are not.
I have the utmost respect for the gentleman and my colleagues who are sponsors of this amendment, but as Chair of the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Subcommittee responsible for the entire budget for the VA, it is our responsibility to meet the needs of veterans across the entire country.
We need to be careful about making rash decisions that have a long- term impact. Unfortunately, the amendments in this en bloc will do more harm than good. And for those reasons, I will vote ``no'' on this en bloc, and I urge my colleagues to do the same.