Mr. Speaker, the following is an abridged transcript of a film entitled ``We Become Silent,'' written and produced by Cleveland resident, Kevin Miller. The topic is the potential effects of the Codex Alimentarius Commission's guidelines on…
Mr. Speaker, the following is an abridged transcript of a film entitled ``We Become Silent,'' written and produced by Cleveland resident, Kevin Miller. The topic is the potential effects of the Codex Alimentarius Commission's guidelines on vitamin and mineral supplement safety.
Narrator: FEAR.
Its' darkness causes humanity to make awful choices. With
dreadful power, fear can rule our lives--and paralyze lofty
hopes and dreams . . . in an instant.
It is the antithesis of god, fear is--a destructive dark
side--the ghost that haunts the brain. It is a universal
trait--a global affliction--and a tool deployed all-too-often
by those intent on inflicting control over the masses.
Robert Verkerk, Ph.D.--Fear preys on the most vulnerable
among us. Fear sells. And Nowhere is fear peddled more
shamelessly than in the fields of medicine and human
nutrition.
Narrator: Fear anesthetizes us . . . it coerces us . . .
making us believe that we can do little on our own to prevent
or treat disease . . . and forces entire NATIONS to kneel at
the altars of orthodox medicine.
Robert Verkerk, Ph.D.--And of course, the fear-mongers are
also preying on the fear of disease. And the solution the
fear-mongers give us are drugs, yet drugs are the single most
dangerous thing we can put in our mouths.
Narrator: It's a sad fact that Pharmaceuticals have become
the dope of modern man--and make no mistake, we are addicted.
Last year, between 3-5 billion prescriptions were written in
the U.S. alone. And for all of its' miracles and heroism,
western medicine has also left disaster in its' wake. The
burdens of drug side effects are being exposed daily: Prozac,
Vioxx, Celebrex, Baycol, Lariam, and Zoloft--just to name a
few--are deeply uncomfortable reminders that secrecy and
sales have often circumvented safety.
There's also the crippling burden of health insurance, and
the MILLIONS who are debilitated by a wave of red ink,
bankrupted as a result of an unexpected illness that they
could not afford. As if by design, health choices are
limited, information is frightfully scarce, lives are ruined
. . . and the truth be damned.
Scott Bukow: Business is business, and people don't like
competition. Smart business people may not always do
something that's best for the people or for someone's health.
Narrator: In addition to these painful realities of life,
however, an abundance of evidence now suggests . . . that
this holy reverence towards modem medicine--may be killing
us.
Carolyn Dean, MD--I wrote Death by Modern Medicine,
inspired actually after writing a paper called Death by
Medicine . . . And what I found after analyzing government
databases and peer-reviewed journal articles . . . I found
that 784,000 people are dying annually, prematurely, due to
modem medicine intervention. When I added up the figures I
could get my hands on, I came up with that astounding number,
and also found studies that said we're only capturing 5-20
percent of the actual deaths . . .
Simmon Wilcox, MD--We're clear that the status quo is equal
to a premature death in
this country . . . Someone needs to stand up and scream
``FOUL, SOMETHING'S GONE AWRY.'' Somebody needs to stop this
madness, and say to the public, ``There's a better option . .
. We will no longer accept the status quo.''
Narrator: But the fear machine is well oiled by
petrochemical dollars and a near worldwide monopoly in
medicine. It works overtime to prevent the truth about
dietary supplements from getting out to the public.
Governments, particularly in Europe and the United States,
seem all-too-eager to comply with the robber barons of
healthcare. It has always been so . . . as evidenced by this
forty-year-old government film . . . which is but one of many
in their arsenals.
FDA Film: 1966: But it's still the same old snake oil . . .
Title appears: ``Health Fraud Racket--Presented by FDA''
Narrator: During the 1990s, however--despite generations of
institutional bias--American consumers won critical battles
against the FDA and the medical/pharmaceutical establishment.
Joseph BASSETT: In the mid-90s, there were movements to put
all supplements on prescription basis and in all of the
countries where they've done that it more than doubled the
cost and made them not available and it's really a freedom of
choice issue . . . it's a consumers issue . . . (1:30) so we
were fighting for the right to access for our own use, our
family's use, and for our businesses. And fortunately, the
health consumer agreed. (1:40) . . . we were actually able to
marshal, one day in a period of hours, one million phone
calls to their government . . . (5:08) It was really a
citizens' uprising.
Narrator: This massive consumer movement for medical
freedom was invigorated when the FDA became enveloped in
controversy of its' own making. The agency approved a guns
drawn raid at the clinic of Dr. Jonathan Wright, and also
raided dozens of health food stores in a pre-meditated power-
grab. Consumer outrage fueled Hollywood to become immersed in
the debate, and actors like James Earl Jones and Sharon
Stone became part of a national campaign for medical
freedom of choice. When Mel Gibson came aboard, he
documented his views in memorable fashion:
Police: ``Freeze''
Mel Gibson: Hey guys . . . guys . . . it's only vitamin C!
You know, vitamin C, like in oranges?''
Narrator: The result of the consumer outcry was that
DSHEA--the dietary supplement health education act--passed
overwhelmingly in 1994. This became the only national law
that linked the use of nutrients in dietary supplements to
reduced risk of disease. And since DSHEA helped ensure
relatively free access to a wide range of dietary supplements
for consumers, activists pulled back from the front lines,
thinking that their struggles were over. Others like Joe
Bassett knew better . . .
Joseph Bassett: We're in a particular industry . . . the
health food industry, that's always been under attack. It's
never stopped, it still isn't stopping because you have
vested interests. In our country you have everybody using
vested interests and the one's who are really entrenched use
the government.
Gerald Kessler: I believe that DSHEA has always been under
attack except for the first few years after DSHEA was passed.
And the present attacks are very broad . . . which means
worldwide, and some of the attacks are just specific to the
Unites States.
Narrator: Now, a bureaucratic shadow called Codex
Alimentarius threatens to silence the medical opposition
forever, both here and abroad. But Codex began innocuously
enough in 1963, as a creation of two arteries of the United
Nations: The Food and Agricultural Organization and the World
Health Organization. Back then, nearly everyone endorsed
their two major goals: to provide nutritious foods for
developing nations--and to shape guidelines for dangerous
industrial chemicals in the food supply.
Within the past decade, however, Codex Alimentarius has
altered its' mission dramatically--many say negatively so--to
include a wide swath of products including dietary
supplements and genetically modified organisms.
Mr. Scott Tips began serving as a U.S. delegate to Codex in
June of 2000. During the first meetings, he did everything he
could to communicate with the head of the US Delegation.
Scott Tips, National Health Federation: I, in a flurry of
notes, passed comments and suggestions (and the like) to
Elizabeth Yetley, who was the American delegate there--it
made no impact. In fact, the only impact I had was collar her
during a break and basically be very tough with her about a
particular clause that she was trying to remove from the
final report, that particular sentence or clause basically
said that the United States supports the right of consumers
to have free access to vitamins and minerals, and she
unilaterally yanked that from the final report.
Narrator: This attitude by Ms. Yetley, who is an employee
of the U.S. Food and Drug administration, is reflective of
codex meetings in general. In an attempt to shine light on
those who are unilaterally making public policy private,
health freedom advocate John Hammell took a small video
camera into two Codex meetings in 1998. These grainy videos
are all that remain of the tapes, which mysteriously
disappeared.
Yetley: moving right along, agenda No. 5 on vitamins and
minerals
Hammell: are you going to strike that second paragraph?
Yetley: well this is a draft positions . . . they're only
draft positions. they're not the final version or formal
position.
Hammell: you've seen the letter from Ron Paul, then? This
was signed by Ron Paul, Congressman Stump and Congressman
Cool.
Yetley: we have received alot of mail and we've looked at
all of it.
Hammel: so you acknowledge this is the will of congress and
of the American people correct?
Yetley: there's a wide range of opinions this one . . .''
Narrator: Despite multiple written requests--and the
intervention of a US Congressman--the FDA refused to answer
any questions about Codex, dietary supplements--or even
labeling--for this documentary. But judging from this rare
interview with Michael R. Taylor, then-deputy commissioner
for policy at FDA, it is obvious that the agency is
unaccustomed to honest intellectual inquiry from the media.
Kevin P. Miller: You stated your concern and the FDA
certainly has on L-Tryptophan. What about your concern about
something like Prozac, very well documented, 28,000 adverse
reports, 1600 suicides associated with that drug.
Michael R. Taylor, deputy commissioner for policy, FDA:
Drugs that go thru our very rigorous testing and review
process are very well understood chemicals. And drugs are
recognized to have both risks and benefits, that's why they
go through a rigorous evaluation. And when those products are
put out on the market, we have a good scientific
understanding of the risks and benefits. And that's laid out
in very detailed labeling that physicians then use to decide
whether to prescribe those products for their patients. Side
effects are part of pharmaceuticals, that's recognized, and
that's why we're so careful scientifically. There's just no
comparison between that situation and dietary supplements,
which have not been subjected to that kind of study . . .
have not been evaluated by FDA, and a large part of the
problem with these supplements is that we simply don't
know about their safety, we don't know about their
benefits, yet there being marketed in some cases for
serious disease-related purposes. ``THERE'S A BIG