Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment. The underlying bill contains no funds for the housing trust fund, yet the gentleman's amendment would create a prohibition on using funds…
Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
The underlying bill contains no funds for the housing trust fund, yet the gentleman's amendment would create a prohibition on using funds that don't exist in the bill. This is simply a messaging amendment that has no practical purpose.
I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment, and I yield to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Lofgren).
Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
Mr. Chairman, just to remind my colleagues, this bill is $1.8 billion below the 2014 bill in spending.
We had a number of our colleagues speak about the lack of funding for their particular programs, and throughout this evening, we are going to have other speakers talk about the lack of funding and programs.
This amendment would cut programs in transportation and housing, without any thought to the relative merit of the programs contained in the bill, so for that reason, I would oppose this amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
Madam Chairman, we rise also in opposition to this amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
Madam Chair, I oppose the amendment.
The levels provided for salaries and expenses at HUD in the base bill are insufficient. Many offices will need to furlough or terminate employees to make these levels work, and this amendment would aggravate this problem further.
As it is, the funding level in this bill will require HUD to furlough its personnel in this office for 12 days. This amendment would increase the number of furlough days required. At these levels, HUD's ability to carry out their mission would be jeopardized. I oppose the amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
Madam Chair, I oppose this amendment. Again, the levels provided for salaries and expenses at HUD in the base bill are insufficient. As it is, the funding level in this bill will require HUD to furlough its personnel in these offices for up to 90 days. Nearly all will be under a hiring freeze.
This amendment would increase the number of furlough days required and would lead to reductions in force. At these levels, HUD's ability to carry out its mission would be jeopardized. I oppose the amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
I rise in support of this amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Madam Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
Madam Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
This amendment solves a problem that does not exist.
Currently, the FHA requires a Social Security number and legal citizenship for all insured loans. FHA does not allow for individual taxpayer identification numbers to be used for mortgages.
What this amendment does is create uncertainty in the FHA underwriting process. It would allow FHA to use individual taxpayer identification numbers only with loans on investment properties.
The FHA has already addressed this issue, and this amendment would create unintended consequences.
I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Madam Chairwoman, I move to strike the last word.
Madam Chairwoman, I also rise in strong opposition to this amendment.
First of all, this amendment violates a collective bargaining agreement that has been negotiated by the Federal Aviation Administration and other agencies within the Department of Transportation and HUD.
For example, there are three groups at FAA that utilize official time: air traffic controllers, the inspectors, and the technicians that repair the air traffic control system.
Official time has been helpful in allowing controllers and technicians to participate in workgroups with the FAA management team to advance NextGen technologies, which all of us are supportive of. It is critical to modernize our air traffic control system.
I oppose this amendment because it would violate collective bargaining contracts, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
Madam Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment. This Amtrak route, the Sunset Limited, runs through 8 States, Arizona, California, New Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida, and if we start picking lines, individual lines in terms of terminating, what we begin doing is a downward spiral for the demise of Amtrak.
So, for the reasons that I want to ensure that my colleague from Texas, his constituents are able to travel on this line, as well as the ones from Arizona, I rise in opposition.
Madam Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
Madam Chairman, I rise in support of this amendment. It would allow transportation agencies to advance construction projects through the use of local workers.
Every year, cities and local communities must contribute their own resources in the form of a local match for projects that receive Federal funds. At a time when many communities are still struggling from the economic distress, it is understandable that these local agencies would want transportation dollars to benefit local workers and benefits businesses.
It will help ensure construction and operation jobs contribute to the local economic development within the cities and towns where the transportation projects exist, instead of outsourcing jobs to other countries or States.
Madam Chairman, I support the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
Madam Chair, I also agree with the chairman for the reasons he stated.
I rise in opposition to this amendment. It would dismantle Amtrak, the only resemblance of a rail system that we have in this Nation.
Obviously, we need to work with them, so that Amtrak becomes more efficient, but this amendment would dismantle it, and for that reason, I oppose the amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.