Mr. Speaker, West Virginia is literally ground zero in the opioid epidemic. Our overdose rate is not just a little bit higher than the national average of the No. 2 State. It is actually 33 percent higher than the No. 2 State. So when we…
Mr. Speaker, West Virginia is literally ground zero in the opioid epidemic. Our overdose rate is not just a little bit higher than the national average of the No. 2 State. It is actually 33 percent higher than the No. 2 State. So when we passed the 21st Century Cures legislation, dedicating $1 billion to fight this horrific epidemic, it gave us hope; it gave me hope.
And that hope was particularly strong in rural States like West Virginia, that finally we might see real resources where it really counts, in rural
communities. But unfortunately, many of the worst-hit States like mine ended up receiving only a minimal amount of funding.
Let me give you an example. A more populous State received five times more funding than my State, but my State's overdose rate was five times higher than the more populous State.
This bill, like every bill, has parts I like and parts I don't like. One of the issues I have fought for is making sure the now $6 billion we are putting towards fighting the opioid crisis will actually get to the places where it matters most.
We must use a formula based on per capita statistics to ensure funds go to the hardest hit States and smaller States where the crisis and the need is the greatest.
As a member of the Appropriations Committee, and having a direct hand on how the $6 billion will be targeted, I have been reassured that rural States like mine will not be shortchanged and--we will work to make sure the language in our funding bill makes it abundantly clear to the Federal agencies that actually set the allocation formulas--we want resources flowing to where they count most.
I want to thank Chairman Frelinghuysen and his predecessor Chairman Rogers for their commitment and leadership to helping.