Madam Speaker, Iran is the full ticket--a defiant rogue state, defined by the State Department as the world's most active--state sponsor of terrorism. Its ambition to develop weapons of mass destruction capabilities has been deliberate,…
Madam Speaker, Iran is the full ticket--a defiant rogue state, defined by the State Department as the world's most active--state sponsor of terrorism. Its ambition to develop weapons of mass destruction capabilities has been deliberate, deceptive, and long in the making.
U.S. policy has to date pursued a patient course of diplomacy including working with our allies, heeding the findings of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and accepting ineffectual incentives.
However, diplomacy does not mean surrender and of the ``constructive engagement'', incentives, and inducements of the Iranian regime have been no more effective than Neville Chamberlain's famous failed policies of appeasement during World War II.
It is time for the U.S. and our allies to undertake the sacrifices required to deny Iran the political legitimacy, technology, materials, and financial resources to pursue its destructive policies--policies that threaten U.S and global security.
It is our hope that H.R. 282 will serve as leverage for cooperation from those allies who claim to be concerned about the growing Iranian threat but who continue to invest billions in Iran's energy sector and continue to assist Iran's nuclear and missile programs.
Ten years ago, the U.S. called on our European allies to take steps to deny Iran the financial resources to nuclear capabilities.
The U.S. also called on Russia and China to cease their support for Iran's nuclear and missile program.
These calls were ignored.
Then, four years ago, the Iran saga within the context of the IAEA begins.
According to multiple IAEA reports Iran's deceptions and breaches of its international obligations have dealt with the most sensitive aspects of the nuclear cycle.
By September of 2004, as Iran resumed large-scale uranium conversion, then Secretary of State Colin Powell called for the Iran case to be referred to the United Nations Security Council for sanctions to be imposed.
That was not to be. The response from the international community was to offer Iran yet more incentives and to increase its investments in Iran's energy sector.
Every step along the way, Iran has demonstrated contempt for the IAEA and has mocked the international community.
In fact, Iran's former nuclear negotiator recently boasted: ``When we were negotiating with the Europeans in Tehran we were still installing some of the equipment at the Isfahan site . . . In reality, by creating a same situation, we could finish Isfahan.''
That is but a microcosm of how concessions and inaction--inaction including the failure to implement U.S. laws such as the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act--have only served to embolden the Iranian regime and increase the threat Iran poses to U.S. national security interests and global stability.
Just in the last few months, Iran: Resumed its nuclear efforts, removing the IAEA seals on uranium conversion plants; announced it could successfully use biotechnology for its nuclear program, thereby improving its capacity to build nuclear weapons; called for Israel to be wiped off the map; Iran's Defense Minister said that it is ``Iran's absolute right to have access to nuclear arms . . .''; Iran is identified by U.S. military commanders as the source of some of the IEDs being used in terrorist attacks in Iraq; Iran's leader announces that Iran would inflict ``harm and pain'' on the U.S.
Just over a week ago, Iran's so-called president announces that Iran has an indigenous capability to enrich uranium and that it continues to pursue a more sophisticated technology, P-2 centrifuges, that could speed Iran's path to nuclear weapons.
Just yesterday, Iran's Grand Ayatollah underscored that Iran would share nuclear technology with other Islamic nations.
This announcement was made during a meeting with Sudan's brutal leader where the Ayatollah praised the Sudanese regime's policies.
This clearly indicates that the Iranian threat is more than just about its nuclear pursuits. This is a repressive regime that denies the Iranian people the most fundamental freedoms.
It is a regime that, since the infamous day in November 1979 when the U.S. embassy was overrun by Iranian radicals and Americans were taken hostage and held for 444 days, has increasingly viewed terrorism as a legitimate means to further its ideological and strategic aims.
Iran provides Hezbollah with funding, safe haven, training, and weapons that have been estimated by some at more than $80 million per year.
Hezbollah has been linked to the 1983 attacks on the U.S. Marine barracks in Lebanon.
Hezbollah has also been linked to the bombing of the U.S. Embassy and the Embassy annex, in Beirut in 1984.
Iran is directly linked to the June 1996 truck bombing of the Khobar Towers U.S. military housing complex in Saudi Arabia.
Iran has used Hezbollah to assert a global reach that has extended into the Western Hemisphere. We witnessed the 1992 bombing of the Israeli embassy in Argentina and the July 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish Community Center, also in Buenos Aires.
In December 2001, Matthew Levitt, a former FBI counter-terrorism official, detailed the beginning of al-Qaeda's links with Iran.
Levitt noted: ``According to U.S. intelligence reports, Osama bin Laden's operatives approached Iranian Ministry of Intelligence and Security, MOIS, agents in 1995 and again in 1996, offering to join forces against America.''
He added: ``In fact, phone records obtained by U.S. officials investigating the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania revealed that 10 percent of the calls from the Compact-M satellite phone used by bin Laden and his key lieutenants were to Iran. ``
Testimony from defendants in the Kenya and Tanzania U.S. embassy bombings, indicate that Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, with Iranian assistance, have had strategic meetings throughout the years in Sudan and elsewhere.
This is just the tip of the iceberg.
There is still time to contain the threat posed by Iran and adopt short and long-term policies that will compel Iran to change its unacceptable behavior.
H.R. 282 provides such a response.
Briefly, this bill: Codifies U.S. sanctions on Iran and requires that they remain in place until Iran has verifiably dismantled its chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs; amends the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act, ILSA, including by enlarging the number of entities that would be subject to sanctions, limiting its application to Iran, and eliminating the expiration date of the law; requires that the names of all individuals, governments and companies that have invested a total of at least $20 million in Iran's energy sector be published in the Federal Register; denies U.S. assistance to countries that are invested in Iran's energy sector; authorizes the President to provide U.S. assistance to peaceful prodemocracy and human rights groups in Iran and for independent broadcasts into Iran.
We must use all available political and economic means to truly make Iran pay for its behavior, and to leverage for cooperation from our allies and convince them to deny Iran the resources to continue along this track.
We must act before it is too late and our options are severely limited.
I ask my colleagues to render their overwhelming support to this legislation.