Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition of the National Apprenticeship Act. As the co-chair of the Skilled Workforce Caucus with my friend from Michigan, Congresswoman Brenda Lawrence, I have had the opportunity to see firsthand, professional…
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition of the National Apprenticeship Act.
As the co-chair of the Skilled Workforce Caucus with my friend from Michigan, Congresswoman Brenda Lawrence, I have had the opportunity to see firsthand, professional training programs in my home State of Arkansas and in Michigan.
And, I want to thank my Democratic colleagues for their sincere effort to prioritize work training programs, however their efforts are flawed.
I have heard my colleagues in the Democratic majority say they want our legislation to reflect America and I share that goal.
I agree that we need legislation that reflects the where people work in our economy.
However, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, roughly 12.1 percent of Americans are employed by unions.
Frankly, this legislation does not reflect our country's workforce because it preferences one business model over another.
Rather than encouraging entities and businesses to be empowered to make training choices that are best for their industry, we are instead picking winners and losers.
As we move towards recovery from the COVID crisis, we need as wide of an approach to training programs as possible, and this bill is not the answer. Republicans, including myself have offered several amendments that will make a bad bill better. Please support my amendment change to this legislation. In that regard, I ask for unanimous consent to submit letters of support for my amendment.
I urge my colleagues to oppose the National Apprenticeship Act.
Madam Speaker, I have an amendment at the desk.
Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I want to thank my friend from Michigan and my friend from North Carolina for their leadership in promoting apprenticeship programs that benefit the American people.
Madam Speaker, my amendment is simple. It trades one word for another, but the impact is significant. The National Apprenticeship Act states, to the extent practicable, that the partnerships for funding under Title II be part of an industry or sector partnership and partner with a labor or joint labor-management organization.
My amendment changes ``and'' to an ``or.'' I am afraid that the unintended consequences of the word will be treated as a requirement for the Federal Government that entities requesting funding under Title II must partner with a union.
This bill, as written, allows the government to play favorites with Title II funding and, instead, we should encourage entities to be empowered to make choices that are best for the workforce in their area.
In my view, entities applying for Title II funding under the bill should be partnering with both non-union and union industry leaders. But I have no doubt that should this bill become law, bureaucrats at the Department of Labor will interpret the use of ``and'' in this section to mean that if you are not partnered with a union organization you will not receive funding. That is my concern.
My home State of Arkansas doesn't have a large union presence, like many States around the country, and this legislation would make it more difficult for entities in my home State to receive Title II funding.
Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, may I inquire how much time is remaining?
Madam Speaker, I include in the Record letters in support of my amendment from the National Association of Home Builders and the Associated General Contractors.
National Association of
Home Builders,
Washington, DC, February 3, 2021.
Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker, House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Kevin McCarthy,
Minority Leader, House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Speaker Pelosi and Leader McCarthy: On behalf of the
more than 140,000 members of the National Association of Home
Builders (NAHB), I write to share our views on H.R. 447, the
National Apprenticeship Act of 2021.
NAHB shares Congress's desire to align the national
apprenticeship system with the needs of a 21st century
workforce and ensure it better serves students, employers,
schools, and other stakeholders. For decades, NAHB's
workforce development partner the Home Builders Institute
(HBI) has offered skills development opportunities and career
and technical education to underserved, non-traditional, and
at-risk populations through its Department of Labor (DOL)-
recognized pre-apprenticeship curriculum. We appreciate the
Committee on Education and Labor's engagement with us last
Congress to address concerns we raised during the committee
process. This has, in our view, improved the bill.
However, we remain deeply concerned that the bill includes
ambiguous language requiring eligible entities seeking access
to robust new grant funding to partner with a labor or joint
labor-management organization ``to the extent practicable.''
Consequently, this provision could restrict bona fide,
respected training providers' access to grant opportunities
or force them to partner with organized labor groups with
which they have no purpose for affiliation. NAHB strongly
supports Hill Amendment #29 which clarifies that entities may
partner with an industry sector partnership or with a labor
or joint labor management organization to satisfy the grant
program's eligibility requirements. This will ensure access
to critical funds by a diversity of registered training
programs as employers seek to rebuild their workforces in the
pandemic-ravaged economy.
NAHB recognizes Congress's work to expand youth and adult
access to instruction in the skilled trades and believes the
National Apprenticeship Act of 2021 is a step in the right
direction. As the bill moves forward in the Senate, we look
forward to working together to modernize the national
apprenticeship system to ensure pre-apprenticeships remain a
viable training tool for residential construction.
Sincerely,
James W. Tobin III
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from North Carolina (Ms. Foxx), the distinguished ranking member on the Committee on Education and Labor.
Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I thank my friend from Michigan. He, in the last Congress, in putting the word ``and'' into the act, said he wanted to give a shout-out to unions. Therefore, I think he has actually identified it very well, that this does improve flexibility and choice. I am concerned about the Department of Labor reading the ``and'' as essentially a directive. So I believe the ``or'' is important, Madam Speaker.
Americans are struggling with the COVID-19 crisis. Restrictions, as it relates to title II funding of this bill, unintentionally hurt the American people trying to get new jobs and opportunities. We need every angle to help our citizens get to a successful career.
I call on my colleagues to support this simple amendment, to change the underlying legislation, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
In closing, let me say this. Bottom line, in the construction industry, important to every one of our States, registered apprenticeships trained about 28,000 people a year, where the need is over 440,000 people a year in construction.
We need more flexibility. This amendment is flexible. It supports the American people.
Madam Speaker, I urge a ``yes'' vote, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.