Floor Statements

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for the time, and I rise in support of this bill.

The Commerce-Justice-Science division of this bill preserves solid funding for an array of important public investments.

For example, the Manufacturing Extension Partnership program is level funded at $175 million. That is so important. The bill provides strong and continued level funding for NOAA climate research and NASA Earth science.

Before I go on, I have some thank-yous to hand out. We have an incredibly hardworking staff. Bob Bonner, Shannon McCully, Faye Cobb, and Nora Faye spent countless sleepless nights working on this enormous project for this bill.

We can't leave out Chris Bigelow, Raquel Spencer, Adam Wilson, and Jason Gray. These people have been indispensable in putting together this monumental piece of legislation.

I am thankful for the very hard work of Chair Kay Granger and Chairman Hal Rogers, my counterpart on the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Subcommittee.

I am also thankful for the members of my subcommittee on the Democratic side: Grace Meng of New York, Dutch Ruppersberger and David Trone of Maryland, and Joe Morelle of New York. They have all worked hard on this, Mr. Speaker, and I am thankful for the very hard work put in by Ranking Member DeLauro and especially by our leader, Hakeem Jeffries. These people together forced the removal of nearly 70 bad policy riders covering environmental policy, immigration, women's health, culture war issues, and more, including the removal of more than a dozen harmful gun riders.

This bill provides robust funding for community policing and local justice assistance grants. It rejects the GOP's proposed cut of $400 million from the FBI--the FBI which protects us from all sorts of murder and mayhem, the elite police force of our Nation. We couldn't cut it like that, and we wouldn't let it happen.

This bill provides $13 million in increases for programs under the Violence Against Women Act, continued level funding for grants under the community violence intervention and prevention program, the STOP School Violence Act, and the Victims of Child Abuse Act grants.

Its level funding for correctional officers in the Bureau of Prisons is so important.

It provides a solid increase of $8 million for the DOJ Antitrust Division to help keep prices low in this country because they will get away from us if we don't enforce our antitrust laws.

I am also proud that we secured continued level funding for the Legal Services Corporation.

Mr. Speaker, the CJS appropriations agreement represents a solid effort to preserve these priorities, and I urge our fellow Members to support it.

Mr. Speaker, on Roll Call No. 8, I was not present because I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay.''

Mr. Speaker, I would inquire of Mr. Larson, if he would yield for a quick question.

It is my recollection, I could be wrong, but I think it was in the year 2014 that you first came out with the Social Security 2100 Act. Am I correct in that?

So here we are 10 years on, and I want you to know I was an original cosponsor of that in 2014, and I was proud to do it, and I thank you for dreaming this whole idea up because it is so important.

We know that it is the retirement of the baby boomer generation, this glut of population going into retirement that is the problem. We know that 2035 is the current doomsday year when we are not able to pay 100 cents on the dollar on claims. It is not a surprise that this has been coming because we knew about the baby boomer generation, and that is why you came up with this 10 years ago because it is not a surprise, and we have to prepare for it.

Mr. Speaker, I speak here not of behalf of myself but on behalf of 176,000 beneficiaries of Social Security in my Congressional District in northeastern Pennsylvania, the vast majority of which are seniors, and the answer is we can't do nothing. We know what happens if we do nothing and we just get closer and closer to the 2035 cliff or whatever year it is going to be.

I am sorry to say that if we do nothing, we end up with the Republican answer, and the Republican answer again and again and again is cut benefits and raise the retirement age. That is what happens if we do nothing.

Cut benefits? Cut benefits? This is a program that is one of the most successful government programs--it is not even a government program; it is an insurance program. It is one of the most successful things that the government has done for American citizens in the history of our republic.

We have kept millions of people from dying in poverty as seniors in this country. We know that right now in excess of 30 percent of seniors receiving Social Security benefits have no other viable source of support. If you take it away from them, they will die in poverty.

We know that probably the most outrageous thing of all is it breaks a promise if you cut benefits. The promise was that you work your whole life, you pay in the premiums and your FICA, you pay in your whole work life, and you will be protected from poverty in your senior years. This would break the promise to cut the benefits.

Raising the retirement age? It has already been described as a cut. It is a cut. It is a change. All of a sudden you have to work longer and longer and longer. To those of us who sit behind a

desk for a living it is not that big of a problem, but there are people who have to lift and carry and climb and dig. And to make them do these things into their senior years just because we refused to do anything about this impending fiscal cliff, it is not right, it is not ethical, and it is not American.

Every time you hear the words ``fiscal commission,'' oh, we should have a fiscal commission, ladies and gentlemen, put your hands on your wallets when you hear those words ``fiscal commission'' because that is all they ever have proposed with fiscal commissions, cutting benefits and raising the retirement age.

The right answer is the Social Security 2100 Act. We have to adjust the cap so it makes sense so that it is egalitarian so that all Americans are included so that we can raise the benefits by 2 percent for the first time in over 50 years. We have to adjust this cap. We have to pass this bill. We have to put people over politics and protect Social Security.

Mr. Chairman, I thank the ranking member of the FS-GG Subcommittee.

Mr. Chair, here in Congress we have a big opportunity to fight drug trafficking in this country.

Congress originally authorized the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area program, HIDTA, in 1988 and renewed it in 1993 and in 1998.

The program provides significant financial assistance to State and local law enforcement and facilitates strong cooperation among those agencies and with Federal law enforcement.

That cooperation has led to many successes in our efforts to disrupt the market for illegal drugs by interdicting and seizing drugs off of our shores and within our borders.

This High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area program removes the supply of illicit substances, making it harder for drug trafficking organizations to sell their products. For example, in 2021, the HIDTA program seized over 193 metric tons of cocaine products, 195 metric tons of methamphetamine, 2,900 metric tons of marijuana, 4 metric tons of heroin, and 9 metric tons of fentanyl.

We all know the toll that the drug trafficking continues to take on communities across our country. Along our southern border, the Mexican cartels are using any means necessary to import precursor chemicals from China to produce synthetic opioids such as fentanyl. That is to meet a growing demand, a demand that has resulted in over 100,000 deaths of Americans in just 1 year.

The accessibility and the affordability of these drugs leave Federal, State, local, and Tribal partners in a continuous defensive posture to keep dangerous narcotics out of our communities and successfully to combat the drug trafficking networks that are responsible.

Nevertheless, still today we continue to see draconian cuts by the majority to law enforcement efforts not only in this bill, the FS-GG bill, but also in the bill produced by the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Subcommittee where I am the ranking member.

These cuts serve only to amplify the supply of illicit drugs. These cuts cause a proliferation in the violence associated with the drug trade. These cuts damage the important work of successful programs like

Mr. Chair, I hope my colleagues join me in voting for this motion to recommit.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment. It is an admirable thing, what the gentleman from West Virginia is proposing, protecting investors, making sure investment money is secure and well protected, but this is attacking the SEC's private fund adviser rule, and that is something that protects investors.

It has been designed with the intent to enhance regulatory oversight and transparency within the private fund industry.

The private fund adviser rule increases investor protection by subjecting private fund advisers to registration and regulatory scrutiny by the SEC.

When you hear the word ``regulation,'' think protection. The rule promotes market integrity and stability by minimizing the risk associated with private fund operations.

Private funds can significantly impact financial markets due to their size and the extent of their investments.

The SEC's private fund adviser rule aims to enhance investor protection. It improves market integrity, and it establishes a consistent regulatory framework for private fund advisers.

This is exactly the kind of protection we need to instill confidence by investors in the market and keep capital flowing in this country.

I urge my colleagues to vote ``no.'' I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this particular amendment.

Again, it is about protecting investors. The SEC's rule addressing conflicts of interest in the use of this so-called predictive data analytics by broker-dealers and investment advisers places a strong emphasis on protecting investor interests. This rule promotes unbiased decisionmaking by requiring firms to proactively manage and disclose conflicts associated with predictive data analytics.

By addressing conflicts of interest, the SEC's rule contributes to market integrity and fairness, and that is what we need for the constant flow of capital to where it needs to go in this country.

Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no,'' and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, the amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chair, I rise in strong opposition to this amendment.

The inclusion of the social cost of greenhouse gases in regulatory analyses ensures that the full spectrum of costs associated with greenhouse gas emissions is considered.

This is about full, open, and honest accounting. It includes not only economic costs but also health, environmental, and societal costs, providing a more accurate and comprehensive assessment.

The social costs of greenhouse gases account for the health-related impacts of climate change, such as heat-related illnesses, air pollution, and the spread of diseases from mosquitos, ticks, and fleas.

Inclusion in regulatory analysis leads to decisions that prioritize the protection of public health, reducing the burden on healthcare systems. This leads

to a more comprehensive cost evaluation, encourages emissions reduction, preserves the environment, and promotes sustainable economic growth.

Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, this amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this particular amendment, which would block a rule that promotes meaningful shareholder engagement by requiring a higher level of shareholder support for resubmitted proposals.

This rule helps streamline the shareholder proposal process by discouraging the repetitive submission of proposals that have failed to gain substantial support in the past. By requiring shareholders to demonstrate substantial support for their proposals, the rule encourages responsible activism and discourages the use of the shareholder proposal process for purely symbolic or nuisance proposals.

Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, this amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition to this amendment.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment, as well.

Contrary to the misrepresentations made by environmental, social, and governance opponents, the SEC's disclosure rule on ESG investments takes no position on the merits of these approaches.

The rule does not define ESG or stipulate any particular approach to it. Instead, this is a rule that requires, for those who make such investments, the disclosure of information about how ESG is defined and implemented in applicable investment portfolios.

The rule will offer increased transparency for investors and protect them from exaggerated or unfounded claims related to ESG investments being made.

Now, if it passes, my friend from South Carolina's amendment would leave investors in the dark and leave them vulnerable to getting misled or bamboozled about ESG claims.

I strongly oppose this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote.

Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, for the reasons previously stated, this amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition to this amendment.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment. It is an amendment that would block the SEC's rule to require companies to disclose material cybersecurity incidents to their investors.

As SEC Chair Gary Gensler puts it: Whether a company loses a factory in a fire--or millions of files in a cybersecurity incident--it may be material to investors.

Mr. Chair, many public companies already provide their investors with cybersecurity incident disclosures. These rules merely make such disclosures more consistent and comparable in a way that can be useful for those making investment decisions.

Why in the world would you want to invest in a company that hides its cybersecurity incidents?

Efforts like this amendment would undermine transparency and provide investors with less useful information regarding material cybersecurity events.

I strongly oppose this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote.

Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, this amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition to this amendment.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment. It is an amendment that would block the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's proposal to strengthen standards for public company auditors to more proactively identify, evaluate, and communicate a company's noncompliance with laws and rules.

Why in the world wouldn't we want to warn investors about scofflaw companies?

The PCAOB's proposal will increase auditor vigilance against fraud and general noncompliance with laws and regulations. Steps like these would encourage companies to take more timely action to remediate issues and reduce harm to investors.

This amendment would represent a significant setback to PCAOB's commonsense efforts to combat fraud. Let's protect investors. I strongly oppose this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote.

Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, this amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chairman, I acknowledge that there is probably no Member of this House happier than I am not to have to wear a mask this afternoon.

Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment. It is a useless amendment. The COVID public health emergency has ended. This is water over the dam. We should stop wasting the House's time on useless amendments.

Mr. Chairman, I oppose the amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, the amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment which would hinder efforts to promote transparency and accountability in small business lending and create hurdles for lenders and community organizations working to help women-owned businesses and minority-owned businesses access capital.

The CFPB's rulemaking would provide small business owners, lenders, and the public with critical information about the $1.7 trillion small business financing market.

This amendment would harm all those who stand to benefit from this expanded transparency and accountability.

Small businesses are the engines of our American economy. Congress should not take action such as this amendment to hurt their ability to prosper.

Mr. Chairman, I strongly oppose this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote. I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the amendment.

A nonpartisan civil service ensures Federal agencies carry out their missions with professionalism, safeguards the rule of law over partisanship, and ensures continuity between Presidential administrations.

This didn't use to be a dispute in Washington, D.C. There was a clear, longstanding bipartisan consensus behind these principles until the previous administration attempted to undermine statutory merit- based protections for Federal civil servants.

Their effort would have moved tens of thousands of career Federal employees to a new job classification that would remove their employment protections.

This amendment seeks to block the Office of Personnel Management's efforts to uphold these vital protections and works to undermine the integrity of a merit-based, nonpartisan civil service.

Mr. Chairman, I strongly oppose this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote. I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Connolly).

Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, this amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote.

Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chairman, Congress gave the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the CFPB, the job of ensuring that consumer protection laws are enforced consistently and that companies do not engage in unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices.

The statute is clear that this authority extends to oversight of nonbank companies that offer financial services or products.

Consistent with its mission of protecting consumers from abusive practices, the CFPB's nonbank registry will provide increased transparency over this sector and deter bad behavior. This amendment would stymie the CFPB's important effort on behalf of consumers and block the agency from preventing abusive practices by nonbanks that offer Financial Services or products.

Congress has to focus its attention on strengthening consumer protections for working people and investors, preventing companies from charging junk fees, and supporting enforcement to crack down on unscrupulous behavior. These are things we should be doing.

Mr. Chairman, I strongly oppose this amendment, I urge a ``no'' vote, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

I claim the time in opposition, Mr. Chairman.

Mr. Chairman, the Federal Labor Relations Authority's proposed changes to rules around how and when Federal employees can cancel payments of their union dues merely restores a longstanding policy about dues payments that had been in place since 1981.

The policy merely establishes that employees may opt out of their union dues payments during a certain time period each year.

Under this longstanding procedure, Federal employees who choose to join their agency's union are made aware of the annual dues revocation period. Every year some members choose to revoke their membership and cease paying dues, a fair process that has worked well for decades.

This amendment would block these decades-old rules and introduce less stability, less financial security, and less predictability for Federal employee unions.

Mr. Chairman, I strongly oppose this amendment, I urge a ``no'' vote, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment.

This amendment blocks an important rule requiring major Federal contractors to publicly disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risks and sets science-based emissions reduction targets.

The Federal Government is the world's single-largest buyer of goods and services, purchasing over $630 billion in the last fiscal year alone. Accordingly, the rule recognizes that the Federal Government also faces significant financial risks from climate change.

This amendment would have us bury our heads in the sand, ignore the Federal Government's exposure to climate change impacts, and prevent us from working toward commonsense climate goals. For those reasons, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no.''

Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment.

This amendment would block the construction of Federal buildings in Washington, D.C., and with all due respect to the gentleman from Montana, it is based on a fundamental misconception. It is not like these projects go up at the whim of the administration. Buildings have to have appropriated funding, and there is a prospectus process on the authorizing side.

This is a misguided amendment.

Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no,'' and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I yield 3 minutes to the distinguished gentlewoman from the District of Columbia (Ms. Norton).

Mr. Chair, I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment.

For more than 50 years, the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission has worked to fulfill its statutory mission to protect the public against unreasonable risk of injuries and deaths associated with consumer products.

By cutting the CPSC's budget by half, this amendment would gut the agency's staff and undermine its mission.

It is an extreme measure that would place children, families, and communities around the country at greater risk of injury and death from product

hazards. This amendment would leave consumers vulnerable to products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard or that can injure children.

Mr. Chair, I strongly oppose this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote.

Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, this amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this senseless amendment.

The White House gun violence task force is committed to treating gun violence as the public health crisis it is. By approaching this issue from a public health perspective, the task force aims to reduce the staggering number of deaths and injuries caused by firearms in the United States.

The task force emphasizes the importance of data-driven and evidence- based policy decisions that will create solutions that balance the rights of law-abiding gun owners with the need for public safety.

Mr. Chair, as a gun owner myself, I tell you that task force seeks to enact commonsense gun safety measures that the majority of Americans support. These include: background checks for all gun sales, closing the gun show and online sale loopholes, and implementing red flag laws temporarily to disarm individuals who pose a danger to themselves or others.

I strongly oppose this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote. I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Florida (Mr. Frost).

Mr. Chair, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Frost).

Mr. Chair, I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chair, I rise in strong opposition to this amendment. Climate-related financial risks can have significant adverse economic impacts on businesses, communities, and the financial sector.

Come on. Addressing these risks is essential to safeguard economic stability and resilience, and these things are crucial in the face of a changing climate.

Financial institutions and Federal agencies ought to consider climate risks in their decisionmaking processes, particularly in investment and lending practices. By doing so, it promotes responsible and sustainable investment choices that support projects and businesses with low environmental impacts.

These executive orders underscore the importance of the United States taking a leadership role in global efforts to combat climate change. By setting ambitious domestic goals and engaging with international partners, the United States can encourage other countries to follow suit, resulting in a more effective global response to climate change. The United States should be leading this effort.

These executive orders are essential for combating climate change because they address climate-related financial risks, encourage responsible investment, promote global leadership, strengthen resilience, and accelerate the transition to clean energy.

They collectively contribute to a more comprehensive and effective approach to mitigating the impacts of climate change and advancing environmental sustainability.

For these reasons, I strongly oppose this amendment, and I do urge a ``no'' vote. I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, this amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment.

The SEC guidance that this rule would block provides clearer guidance for companies for disclosure of non-generally accepted accounting principles, non-GAAP. This clarity helps investors better understand a company's financial performance, making investment decisions more informed. It is as simple as that.

Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no,'' and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I oppose this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment.

The SEC's 2022 proxy adviser rule promotes transparency and accountability by requiring proxy advisory firms to provide more disclosure about their methodologies, their potential conflicts of interest, and their engagement with issuers. This rule aims to improve the accuracy and reliability of proxy advisory recommendations, which play a crucial role in corporate governance.

The SEC's 2022 proxy adviser rule strikes a balance among the interests of issuers, investors, and proxy advisory firms.

Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no,'' and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I oppose this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment.

Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment.

The Communications Equity and Diversity Council at the Federal Communications Commission, the FCC, is instrumental in promoting inclusivity within the organization. By championing diversity, it ensures that the workforce represents a broader spectrum of perspectives, fostering a more inclusive and equitable workplace.

The council's existence improves decisionmaking at the FCC by incorporating diverse viewpoints. Diverse teams are more likely to generate innovative ideas, leading to better policies and regulations that benefit a wider range of people in the ever-evolving communications and technology sector.

The Communications Equity and Diversity Council also plays a crucial role in ensuring that the FCC complies with American law as well as ethical guidelines related to diversity and equity in employment.

For these reasons, I strongly oppose this amendment.

Mr. Chair, I urge a ``no'' vote, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chair, I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, today, I recognize the important work and legacy of the United Neighborhood Centers of Northeastern Pennsylvania on its 100th anniversary. For a century, this organization has been an integral part of the region, dedicated to supporting and empowering low-income families, seniors, youth and immigrants through a wide range of community-based programs.

The United Neighborhood Centers was chartered in 1923, and since then its members have worked to provide services and create opportunities that empower individuals and build strong, interdependent communities. The organization is known for its ``wraparound approach,'' a strategy of ensuring that their care is so thorough that every emerging need of the community is met. This is achieved through the offering of a comprehensive set of community programs, such as emergency assistance programs, work programs and more, all to guide those in need from their lowest to their highest.

The United Neighborhood Service Development Company creates properties to be used for affordable housing, as well as providing no- cost housing counseling. The organization provides free childcare services, free summer camp opportunities and manages several programs for youth and teens throughout Northeast Pennsylvania. The organization also has undertaken a revitalization project for the town of Pine Brook, dedicating itself to improving the neighborhood through many physical, social and economic projects. Additionally, it provides aid to seniors throughout the region, offering services such as in-person fitness activities as well as grab-and-go meals.

Some of the most significant contributions of the organization to the community are its community education programs. These programs, which include the Citizenship Education program, the Readiness in Skilled Employment Program and the Leaders in Training program, provide youth and adults with the skills needed to help them meet their own goals, secure their independence and transform their communities.

For 100 years, the United Neighborhood Centers has been steadfast in its support for all in the community. Its commitment to the development of Northeast Pennsylvania is an inspiration to all. I am honored to recognize this organization's many achievements and congratulate its members on this momentous milestone.

Mr. Speaker, today I recognize the bravery and valor of U.S. Army Veteran Sergeant Joseph Drake, recipient of the Congressional Gold Medal and one of only 12 remaining WWII Army Rangers. Born on October 24, 1924, Sgt. Drake recently celebrated his 99th birthday with family and friends at his home in Hawley, PA, where he currently resides.

As the member of the U.S. House representing Hawley, in Wayne County, I am grateful to have this opportunity to recognize the courage, dedication and selfless service that Sgt. Drake offered in support of our Nation during WWII in April of 1943 at just 19 years old.

Sgt. Drake honorably served with Company A of the U.S. Army Ranger Battalion and after training in Mississippi, Louisiana and England he fought in five battles in the European Theater, including the Battle of the Bulge and Central Europe. His outfit spearheaded the invasion of Europe by climbing the cliffs of Pointe du Hoc on D-Day on June 6, 1944.

Sgt. Drake proudly recalls Company A moving to relieve a Battalion from the PA National Guard's 28th Infantry Division in Ardennes, France, during the initial German attack that led to the Battle of the Bulge. Sgt. Drake and his Company fought through Luxenberg, Belgium, Germany and Czechoslovakia until the end of WWII in 1945.

Sgt. Drake's distinguished service has earned him many medals, including this institution's highest expression of national appreciation for distinguished achievements and contributions--the Congressional Gold Medal.

Upon returning to the United States in October of 1945, Sgt. Drake was honorably discharged from the U.S. Army in December and started a family with his late wife, the former Lydora LaTournous, in Hawley. They were married on September 23, 1950, and raised two daughters and one son. Life gifted them with many grand and great-grandchildren.

Shortly after arriving back home, Sgt. Drake joined the U.S. Postal Service and worked there for 34 years, 15 of which he was the Hawley postmaster. He's proud to be the first person from Hawley, and without a political appointment, to have served in this position.

Sgt. Drake was active in his community, serving as Quartermaster and Treasurer with the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post 5823 in Hawley, founded by his late brother Robert J. Drake. He worked with the Mayor of Hawley and others to plan parades and carnivals. After the post disbanded in 2008, he made arrangements to have the post headquarters on Park Place turned over to the County of Wayne, for the Hawley Senior Center.

Sgt. Drake's devotion to our Nation is evident in his exemplary military career, and I thank him for his service while wearing, and after hanging up his uniform. He truly embodies what it means to be one of the few remaining members of the ``Greatest Generation.''

Sgt. Drake is a true American hero whose commitment to duty and service distinguishes him as an individual whose character represents the very best of Pennsylvania's 8th Congressional District, and I am proud to be his Representative in Washington.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today, along with my colleague, Rep. Gregory Murphy, to speak on behalf of all those Americans who were exposed to the toxic water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. When writing the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, we understood that the only way the veterans, their families and others could get fair and just compensation was through a jury trial. Let there be no ambiguity. Let this be understood to be our unequivocal expression our intent, from the inception of the bill through final passage and into enactment: the claimants who have suffered so intensely as a result of the toxic water at Camp Lejeune have the right to a trial by jury.

We were aware of how the Federal Tort Claims Act worked, through a bench trial, and we specifically rejected that model when we wrote the Act. Indeed, it has always been our intent for the Act to stand separate and apart from the Federal Tort Claims Act in all respects. For these reasons, we expressly included a provision in subsection (d) of the Act confirming every plaintiffs right to a jury trial. The Department of Justice is inexplicably reading this provision out of the statute.

Specifically, the United States Department of Justice has recently filed a Motion in the Camp Lejeune Water Litigation proceeding pending before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina in which the Department asserts that those harmed by the toxic water at Camp Lejeune between 1953 and 1987 are not entitled to a jury trial. This argument is inexplicable.

We fundamentally disagree with the Department's position. When we drafted the Act, it was our clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal express intent to provide all those covered by the Act with the right to a trial by jury against the United States of America for the harm they suffered at Camp Lejeune. We thought it was critically important that people who had been betrayed and misled by the government for decades would have a right to have their claims decided by a jury of their peers.

We want to cite the law as written in ``Public Law 177-168 Section 804. Federal Cause of Action Relating to Water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina subsection (d) Exclusive Jurisdiction and Venue--The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any action filed under subsection (b), and shall be the exclusive venue for such action. Nothing in this subsection shall impair the right of any party to a trial by jury.''

We want to take this opportunity to again restate what we have always intended and what is clearly written in Public Law 177-168. We are dismayed that the Department of Justice has taken this wrongheaded position, which flies in the face of everything Congress intended for those harmed by the toxic water at Camp Lejeune. Those who have steadfastly defended our country rate no less than the rights they deserve as American citizens.

Mr. Speaker Pro Tempore, today I recognize the distinguished career of Retired U.S. Army Colonel and President Emeritus of Lackawanna College Mark Volk, a true hero of Northeast Pennsylvania, who has dedicated over four decades of his life to selfless service. While Colonel Volk's military career is marked with honor and valor, it is his profound contributions to Lackawanna College that I wish to recognize upon his well-deserved retirement.

Colonel Volk's military journey spans 26 years, a testament to his unwavering commitment to duty and service. His military career included 13 years in Field Artillery and an additional 13 years in Military Intelligence. During this time, Colonel Volk held various staff and command positions, both in the United States and Germany, gaining expertise and honing his leadership skills.

While serving as the Chief of the Strategic Leadership Division in the Army Strategy, Plans and Policy Directorate (G3) at the Pentagon, his office was in the wing impacted by the plane during the tragic events of September 11, 2001. For his heroic efforts and life-saving actions immediately following the attack on the Pentagon, he was awarded the Soldier's Medal, the Army's highest non-combat award for heroism. Additional military awards earned by Colonel Volk include the Legion of Merit, the Meritorious Service Medal with 5 Oak Leaf Clusters, the Army Commendation Medal with 4 Oak Leaf Clusters, the Army Achievement Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the Armed Forces Service Medal and the NATO Medal.

Upon his retirement from the military on January 1, 2004, Colonel Volk returned to NEPA and embarked on another chapter of service, this time in the field of education at Lackawanna College. Over the course of 16 remarkable years his tenure was distinguished by remarkable achievements, serving as the executive vice president from 2006 to 2012 and vice president for operations and plans from 2005 to 2006 prior to taking over as president in July 2012 until his retirement in 2020. Under his leadership, the college introduced online courses and degrees, offered baccalaureate degrees, established a nursing program and expanded with new extension centers. It is a testament to his dedication and leadership that the college was ranked as the fastest- growing private college or university, with enrollments of 500 or more students during his presidency.

Perhaps his most enduring legacy is his belief in the potential of individuals from all walks of life. In his eyes, greatness is not reserved for the few: He firmly believes that everyone has the capacity to be a force for positive change in a world that yearns for it. His optimism is contagious, and his unwavering faith in the region, families, and students of NEPA hag left an indelible mark.

Colonel Mark Volk, and his wife Lynn, continue to be active and generous members of our community, giving their time and energy to numerous organizations. Their dedication to service has set a shining example for us all. I commend Colonel Volk for his unwavering commitment to our community and our Nation; he truly represents the very best of Pennsylvania's 8th Congressional District.

Mr. Speaker, today I recognize Midshipman Second Class Madison O'Donnell who decisively acted with the valor while saving a gentleman in peril when attending the United States Naval Academy in June 2023.

While driving near Santee Basin Dock, Maryland, Midshipman O'Donnell heard cries for help and halted her vehicle. Upon locating the distressed individual, she quickly ran towards the dock to rescue a gentleman who appeared to be drowning.

Midshipman Madison O'Donnell aptly assessed the situation and proficiently deduced that a severe laceration was impeding the gentleman from pulling himself to safety. Without hesitation, she rescued the drowning man by pulling him out of the basin.

Reprieved from the danger of drowning, Midshipman O'Donnell calmed the gentleman and administered first aid treatment. She then drove him home to his family who expressed immense gratitude for her meritorious and selfless assistance.

In recognition of this act of valor, Colonel James P. McDonough, USMC, 89th Commandant of Midshipmen at the United States Naval Academy, awarded Midshipman Second Class Madison O'Donnell the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal for professional achievement in the superior performance of her duties as a midshipman on September 8, 2023.

As the member of the U.S. House representing Midshipman O'Donnell's hometown of Greenfield Township, Pennsylvania, and the Member responsible for nominating her to the United States Naval Academy's Class of 2025, I am proud to celebrate Midshipman O'Donnell's admirable act of heroism.

Midshipman Second Class O'Donnell's actions, dedication to duty and the preservation of life reflect great credit upon herself, our community in Northeast Pennsylvania, the United States Navy, and the nation. I am confident that she will have an exemplary career in service to our Nation, and I look forward to sharing in her successes in the future.

Mr. Speaker, today I pay tribute to the late Ronald L. Felton, a true champion of civil rights and social justice, veteran, husband, father and grandfather from Northeast Pennsylvania who has left an indelible mark on the fight for civil rights and social justice through his profound dedication to uplifting the marginalized and advancing equality.

After serving with distinction in the U.S. Air Force, Ron settled into Wilkes-Barre where he worked tirelessly to bring about positive change in the vibrant community. He demonstrated unwavering dedication not only as a devoted family man but also as a committed professional. His tenure as a system analyst at Prudential, IBM, and the Times Leader newspaper showcased his pursuit of excellence.

Yet, it was Ron's role as President of the NAACP Wilkes-Barre Branch 2306 that truly defined his legacy. For an impressive 18 years touching 3 distinct decades, he led with unyielding passion, advocating for civil rights and social justice. His tireless work laid the foundation for lasting change, exemplified by his instrumental role in establishing Martin Luther King Jr. Day as a holiday for Wilkes-Barre City employees and the renaming of Coal Street Park to Martin Luther King Jr. Park. Ron's commitment to honoring Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s legacy and fostering an inclusive community remains an enduring testament to his character.

As the Eastern Sectional Director of the Statewide NAACP, his work transcended our

region as he championed equality on a broader scale. During the COVID- 19 pandemic, his dedication to ensuring minorities had access to vaccinations showcased his deep commitment to the well-being of all.

As we reflect on Ron's legacy, we are reminded of the profound impact he had on individuals across our community. From his leadership in the NAACP to his involvement with the Prince Hall Free Masons and his dedication to his faith at Mt. Zion Baptist Church, Ron's imprint on the fabric of our society is unmistakable.

We extend our heart felt condolences to his wife Peggy, his son Ronald R. Felton, his cherished grandchildren, and his extended family. While the loss of Ron is deeply felt, his legacy will continue to inspire generations to come. His dedication to justice, equality and community development will forever be etched in our hearts. May his life's work guide us in our ongoing pursuit of a just and inclusive society.

Mr. Speaker, today I recognize the 2023 Luzerne County Sports Hall of Fame inductees. This year's class of sports superstars includes multiple All-American athletes, high school and collegiate hall-of-fame inductees, an iconic broadcaster, a dedicated official, and more.

Each year, the Luzerne County Sports Hall of Fame honors those who have brought fame and recognition to the state of Pennsylvania through their outstanding achievements and contributions in athletic endeavors.

This year's inductees include:

Richard J. Callahan, sports broadcaster

Scott Davis, athlete--baseball and wrestling

Eugene S. Domzalski, athlete and coach--baseball

William J. Downey, sports official

Jamie Kauczka Esgro, athlete--basketball

Marsha Krysiewski Hanson, athlete--swimming, track and field and field hockey

Joseph J. Hasay, athlete--basketball

Jim Hill, coach--baseball

Joanne McComb, athlete and coach--baseball and basketball

Rebecca Mack McGraw, athlete--track and field

Joseph M. O'Hara, DVM, athlete--water polo, swimming, and volleyball

Katlin A. O'Hara, DPM, athlete--swimming, water polo, and track and field

Michael J. Papi, athlete--baseball

James J. Stehle, athlete--baseball

Amy Viti, athlete--track and field and cross country

Ninaleigh Stratton Wozniak, athlete and coach--swimming, softball and volleyball

Each person honored has made local sports history through their outstanding feats of athletic achievement, broadcasting, refereeing, or by leading their teams to victory as coaches. They have left an indelible mark on regional athletics, and I am pleased to celebrate their contributions to our sports communities in Northeastern Pennsylvania.

It is an honor to recognize these 16 talented individuals on their induction into the Luzerne County Sports Hall of Fame. May their stories and impressive careers inspire the next generation of Pennsylvania athletes striving for excellence.

Mr. Speaker, today I pay tribute to the late Armand M. Martinelli, a beloved teacher, veteran, husband, father, grandfather, great-grandfather and community leader from Northeastern Pennsylvania who has left an indelible mark on our community through his profound dedication to education and service.

Armand Martinelli, a devout Roman Catholic born in Olyphant, PA, embodied the values of faith, integrity, and selflessness throughout his 92 years of life. From his humble beginnings at Lafayette School in Scranton and Mother Cabrini School to becoming a member of the first 4- year graduating class at Scranton Preparatory School, Armand's early education laid the foundation for a lifetime of intellectual pursuit and service to others.

Armand Martinelli served his country valiantly during the Korean War. His military journey took him from the 101st Airborne in Breckinridge, Kentucky, to the U.S. Counter Intelligence School at Fort Holabird in Baltimore, Maryland. He displayed unwavering commitment and courage as a special agent with the 704th CIC in Teague and the 308th CIC in Pusan, earning the respect and gratitude of his fellow soldiers.

Upon returning to civilian life, Armand embraced a diverse array of occupations before discovering his true calling as an educator. For over 5 decades, he worked as a self-employed painter, an insurance agent, and a teacher at West Scranton High School. It was within the walls of West Scranton High School that Armand would leave an enduring legacy as an influential and dedicated educator.

For 30 years, Armand taught social studies, Latin, and journalism, molding the minds of countless students who passed through his classrooms. His commitment extended beyond the subject matter; he served as an athletic director for 24 years and provided guidance to numerous clubs and organizations, including the yearbook, school newspaper, and Latin club, among others. His passion for education and genuine care for his students earned him the love and admiration of those he taught, and many kept in touch with him long after graduation.

Outside the classroom, Armand's dedication to public service was equally commendable. He actively sought to improve our community, serving as a member of the Scranton School Board where be championed education initiatives. He also played an integral role in the formation of the Scranton Federation of Teachers.

Devoted to serving his West Scranton community and proud of his Italian heritage, Armand enjoyed spending time at the Victor Alfieri Club where he was an original member of the Cetaiolos bocce team as well as attending weekly get together with friends at the Villa Maria Restaurant.

Above all else, Armand loved his family. He took great pride in his roles as a husband, father, grandfather and great-grandfather. He always looked forward to weekly Sunday dinners, where he treated his family to his homemade sauce and meatballs, which he faithfully made right up to the last 2 weeks of his life.

After retiring from his distinguished teaching career, Armand continued to serve our community, working as a Tipstaff for Judge James J. Walsh, and serving on numerous local executive boards, including the Scranton Redevelopment Authority, the Scranton Housing Authority, and the Lackawanna Drug and Alcohol Treatment Service. Armand's commitment to making a positive impact on the lives of others knew no bounds.

As we mourn the loss of a true pillar of our community, let us also celebrate the profound impact Armand Martinelli had on the lives of countless individuals. Through his selfless dedication to education, service, and family, he leaves behind a legacy that will continue to inspire future generations. May the memory of Armand M. Martinelli serve as a beacon of hope and goodness in our community, and may we be reminded of the power of a single individual to positively influence the lives of others.

Mr. Speaker, today I recognize the incredible achievements of the 2022-2023 Mid Valley High School softball team. During this year's season, the Spartanettes brought great pride to our community by winning the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association (PIAA) 3A State Championship for the first time in school history.

As the Member of the U.S. House representing the Mid Valley School District, I'm proud to celebrate the hard work, leadership, and comradery of the Spartanettes that led to their championship. They played with passion and a sense of faith in one another which was evident in every game. They demonstrated that when a group of individuals support each other with a common goal, anything is possible.

I want to acknowledge the coaching staff, led by Coach Mike Piercy, and Assistant Coach Joseph Bour, who have instilled a culture of commitment, integrity, and respect in these athletes. Under their guidance, Mid Valley truly played a season worthy of the first-ever softball state title in Mid Valley history.

The success of the 2022-2023 team is also a reflection of the support they received from their school and locality. From parents and families who cheered them on in every game, including traveling to Penn State from Mid Valley for the championship. By teachers and staff who have provided guidance and encouragement, and by the businesses and organizations that also supported the team, the Mid Valley Spartanettes have been lifted up and given confidence by the entire community.

In Northeastern Pennsylvania we believe in the power of working together and showing civic spirit. The Mid Valley Spartanettes championship is a testament to the strength of that belief. These athletes demonstrated what can happen when we support our young people to the fullest.

So, I congratulate the 2022-2023 Mid Valley High School softball team on their historic season and thank them for inspiring us all. I'm proud to represent Mid Valley and look forward to celebrating many more successes in the future.

Mr. Speaker, today I recognize a significant milestone in the history of our region. June 26, 2023 marked the 59th anniversary of the Marshalls Creek Explosion in Middle Smithfield Township, Monroe County, Pennsylvania.

On June 26, 1964, the Marshalls Creek Fire Company responded to a tractor trailer fire on State Route 209. Shortly thereafter, the trailer exploded killing firefighters F. Earl Miller, Leonard Mosier and Edward Hines. Three passersby also died: John Regina, Joseph J. Horvath Jr., and Lillian Paesch. The explosion also injured 10 other people, caused damage to the Regina Hotel, Middle Smithfield Elementary School, and the Pocono Reptile Farm.

After our community endured the chaos of the explosion, it was discovered that the tractor trailer had no identification placard reporting its explosive contents. During numerous Congressional hearings, the Marshalls Creek Explosion served as a catalyst for remarks concerning increased traffic safety measures and inspections. The concerns expressed ultimately became law with the enactment of the Transportation Safety Act of 1974 and further development of the Emergency Response Guidebook, which is widely used as a resource by Fire Responders across North America.

Today, 59 years later, the Middle Smithfield Township community comes together to dedicate a historical marker at Regina Farms, across from where the explosion occurred. The business is owned by Ed Regina, brother of the late John Regina. This marker will help preserve a piece of history of the community and continue to educate future visitors of the site.

Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me in recognizing the 59th anniversary of the 1964 Marshalls Creek Explosion to acknowledge the importance and impact that this event has had on the families of those killed in the explosion, Middle Smithfield Township, and traffic and transportation safety across the Nation.