Floor Statements

Mr. Speaker, I was unable to cast recorded votes on rollcall Nos. 375 and 377. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on both votes.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to bring attention to a disease that has a profound impact on those that it afflicts. Autism, Mr. Speaker, is a bioneurological developmental disability that generally appears before the age of 3. Autism impacts the normal development of the brain in the areas of social interaction, communication skills and cognitive function. Individuals with autism typically have difficulties communicating and interacting with others and often engage in repetitive behaviors.

I spoke on this floor recently about how people with autism are affected by this disease, and the early warning signs of autism that parents should watch for as their infants become toddlers. Today, I want to share with our colleagues the impact that autism has on the families of those that it affects and the struggles parents must endure to raise children with autism.

During a recent district work period, I met several of my constituents, including Howard and Jonica Chittum, and their wonderful son, Mac, who is autistic. They shared with me the emotional and financial challenges of having a child with autism.

The Chittums told me how Mac needs intensive speech and occupational therapy, services for which Medicaid partially pays, but that their health insurance does not. They talked of their excitement when Mac makes progress and of their disappointment when he struggles. The Chittums are fortunate in that they somehow have found time to work and care for Mac.

They also have managed to pay for more intensive therapy for Mac, which has helped him make significant progress in a relatively short time. I was pleased to learn that Mac's language skills are now on age level. His eye contact has improved, and he is showing more interest in other people.

Some people, however, Mr. Speaker, are not as fortunate as the Chittums. I also met with Monica Bice, whose daughter, Jade, has autism, over the district work period. Monica, who met Jonica through a support group for parents of children with autism, wants desperately to provide Jade with the intensive therapy she needs, but simply cannot afford. And Jonica said, ``It's just not fair.''

I think this is an unconscionable situation that we must remedy, Mr. Speaker.

I am pleased to have cosponsored legislation our colleague from California, Mrs. Bono, has introduced to encourage screening, early intervention and education about autism. This bill, the Combating Autism Act, would strengthen and coordinate all Federal activities related to autism research, diagnosis, screening and treatment.

I think it also is important for parents to know that they are not alone when trying to raise a child with autism. There are a multitude of national, State and local organizations such as Aware for Autism, a support group for parents of children with autism, which Monica started. I encourage anyone who has a child with autism to seek assistance from those who are facing the same challenges that they are.

Mr. Speaker, I believe we can and should do more to raise awareness about autism and encourage its prevention, treatment, and hopefully some day soon, its cure. I urge our colleagues to support the Combating Autism Act and give hope to people with autism and their families and friends.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the rule. During consideration of the bill, I will be offering an amendment with several of my Florida colleagues; and I want to thank the Rules Committee for making the important amendment in order.

While some use political rhetoric to say ``do nothing,'' some of us for months have worked diligently to craft solid statutory protections for Florida and other coastal States.

Opposition to drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf is particularly strong in Florida, due to the potentially devastating consequences it could have for our economy, natural resources, and quality of life.

I want to thank Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo and his staff for their willingness to work with me, Governor Jeb Bush, Congressman Putnam and other members of the Florida delegation on the very sensitive issue of offshore drilling.

While I applaud the efforts of the Resources Committee to allow States to determine whether or not drilling occurs closest to their coastlines, I believe that if we truly, truly want to maximize the ability of States to protect their own coastlines, they should have to opt in to drilling, as opposed to being required to opt out of drilling.

Therefore, the amendment my colleagues and I will be offering today provides States with a true opt in, meaning that drilling could only occur if a State requests leasing.

Our amendment also expands the true opt in protection from 100 miles to 125 miles. While some States may choose to allow drilling close to their shores, those States can still do so under this amendment. They are not precluded from doing so. We believe that States that want to protect their shores from drilling should be able to do so to the maximum degree possible.

I urge my colleagues to support the Bilirakis/Wasserman Schultz/ Young/Brown-Waite/ Harris/Wexler/Mario Diaz-Balart/Stearns amendment to H.R. 4761 and give States real control, real, solid, true, statutory control over whether or not drilling occurs off their coastlines.

Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.

Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

I am offering this amendment with several of my Florida colleagues: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Bill Young, Ginny Brown-Waite, Katherine Harris, Robert Wexler, Mario Diaz-Balart, and Cliff Stearns.

First of all, Mr. Chairman, I am told that this amendment is slated for defeat, and that is really unfortunate because it greatly improves the basic bill in that it provides solid, true statutory protections off of Florida and all coastal State shores. This amendment does not shred the existing 25-year drilling moratorium, as claimed by some vocal groups. In fact, that moratorium ends in 2007 and 2012. The moratorium is by executive order. It can be revoked at any time, even before July 1, 2007, and before 2012.

This amendment codifies in statute the protection up to 125 miles. The moratorium does not now cover the Florida Keys nor most of the Florida Atlantic. The amendment gives protection to all of the Florida coastlines and to other coastal States permanently, not subject to the whims of any executive.

This form of government is a republic, meaning that we legislators represent our constituents' interests, a government of, by and for the people. We ask ourselves, who is better equipped to better decide how close offshore drilling should come to a State's coast, the U.S. Congress or the States themselves?

I say that the people of coastal States should make that decision. If they want leasing and drilling, they can opt in. If they do not, then no action is required.

The bottom line, Mr. Chairman, of my amendment is to allow States to determine whether or not drilling occurs closest to their coastlines.

Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

I would suggest to the gentleman, with all due respect, that the mountains of West Virginia, those beautiful mountains, belong to all the people, too, but I would expect the people of West Virginia could make the best decision regarding those mountains.

Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Florida (Ms. Wasserman Schultz.)

Mr. Chairman, I yield 45 seconds to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Boyd).

Mr. Chairman, I yield 30 seconds to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Wexler).

Mr. Chairman, I yield 25 seconds to the gentlewoman from Florida (Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite).

Mr. Chairman, I yield to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Stearns) for the purposes of a unanimous consent request.

(Mr. STEARNS asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

Mr. Chairman, I yield the remaining 20 seconds to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart).

Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I do rise for purposes of engaging in a colloquy with you.

Mr. Chairman, first of all, I want to thank you and the ranking member, Mr. Mollohan, for restoring funding for several critical Voice of America language services that were slated for reductions, including the Greek and Turkish services.

As cochair of the Hellenic Caucus and a strong supporter of resolving the Cyprus issue, I believe finding innovative ways to bring the two sides closer are necessary. The Greek and Turkish VOA services have proposed a new joint program initiative promoting the end of the division in Cyprus by engaging both Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot communities in a revised process using radio and television. This program would entail reporting on bicommunal developments, conducting

interviews with prominent figures and airing them as part of radio and TV dialogues, or bridges, if you will, between the two communities. As H.R. 5672 moves through the appropriations process, I hope, Mr. Chairman, you will work with members of the Hellenic and Turkish Caucuses to find the funding needed to initiate this new joint program.

Mr. Chairman, if the gentleman will yield once again?

Thank you again, Mr. Chairman.

This is really a pretty special thing when you come to think about it. This is the first time that we are working together with the Turkish Caucus on an issue which we all agree has enormous potential to benefit the relations and close the gap between the two communities; and I hope, sir, that you will work with us to find, along with Mr. Mollohan, to find funding for this critical Cyprus reconciliation joint initiative.

Mr. Chairman, I thank Chairman Wolf and Mr. Mollohan for their consideration and for yielding us the time, and I look forward to working with both of you in the future.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to bring attention to a disease that has a profound impact on those it afflicts. Autism is a bioneurological developmental disability that generally appears before the age of 3.

Autism impacts the normal development of the brain in the areas of social interaction, communication skills, and cognitive function. Individuals with autism typically have difficulties communicating and interacting with others and often engage in repetitive behaviors. Individuals with autism often suffer from numerous physical ailments, which may include allergies, asthma, epilepsy, digestive disorders, persistent viral infections, feeding disorders, sensory integration dysfunction, sleeping disorders and more.

Some may be surprised, Mr. Speaker, to learn that autism is diagnosed four times more often in boys than girls. Its prevalence is not affected by race, region or socioeconomic status. According to the National Autism Association, autism and related developmental disorders affect one in 166 people across the country, 10 times as many as just a decade ago.

No one knows for certain what causes autism. Some believe that anything from genetics to certain vaccines can lead to autism. Those with infants and toddlers should watch for the early signs of autism, which include no big smiles by 6 months, no sharing of sounds, smiles or facial expressions by 9 months, and no babbling by 12 months, no words by 18 months, and any loss of speech or social skills at any age.

I wish to repeat that, Mr. Speaker: those with infants and toddlers should watch for the early warning signs of autism, which include no big smiles by 6 months, no sharing of sounds, smiles or facial expressions by 9 months, no babbling by 12 months, no words by 18 months, and any loss of speech or social skills at any age.

Autism, however, does not affect life expectancy. Currently there is no cure for autism, though with early intervention and treatment, the diverse symptoms related to autism can be greatly improved. This makes it imperative that appropriate resources are available to help people with autism and their families.

Mr. Speaker, I intend to take to this floor over the coming weeks and months to highlight the impact autism has on those it afflicts and those who care for them. I hope by doing so that I can help raise awareness about this disease and encourage greater understanding about the importance of research into its prevention, detection and treatment.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Ashley Philips, a young woman of enormous potential whose life was tragically cut much too short this past weekend.

Ashley Philips was a vibrant and ambitious young woman who seemed destined for success in whatever path she chose. She was an excellent student, having earned honors and achieved a superior grade point average at Tarpon Springs High in my hometown, where she participated in the veterinary program. She was a good athlete and ran track at school.

Ashley also was dedicated to her community. She volunteered to help local senior citizens, worked at an area day care, and interned in the city clerk's office in Oldsmar, FL, in my congressional district. She also was the granddaughter of two of my closest friends, Oldsmar Mayor Jerry Beverland and his wife, Wanda, and was to serve as my congressional page this summer. I know they and Ashley's mother, Hope, and brother, Austin, were proud of what she had already accomplished, and looked forward to all that was to come for this remarkable young woman.

Ashley also had daring dreams and lofty goals. She wanted to do so many things, including becoming a veterinarian, lawyer, photographer, and a writer. She no doubt would have achieved all that she had hoped. Her grandfather expressed how everyone feels, noting that she ``was a brilliant girl with a brilliant future, snatched away in the blink of an eye.''

Mr. Speaker, I grieve for Ashley's family and friends. They are really the only ones who can truly understand how special she was and know how greatly she will be missed. Her friends and family and those with whom she came into contact would surely agree that the world is a much better place for having had her in it, no matter however briefly. I pray that her memory, and the knowledge that she will live in eternal peace, will comfort those who cared for her in this time of great sadness and sorrow.

Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairman Deal, and I do rise in support of this bill which I have cosponsored with Chairman Deal and with our colleague from Texas (Mr. Gene Green).

I have long championed community health centers, Mr. Speaker, because they have been a model for delivering primary and preventive care efficiently and effectively for more than four decades. They serve more than 16 million Americans, many of whom are underinsured or uninsured, in areas where people need most services. They make their services available to all residents of the communities in which they are located without regard to their ability to pay.

One of the reasons community health centers have successfully provided care to so many through the years is that the individual centers are governed by a community board, a majority of whose members are patients of the health center itself. I think this feature makes health centers more responsive to the needs of the communities they serve than they otherwise might be.

Health centers have proven that health care need not be complicated or expensive to work well. The health centers program started more than 40 years ago with the idea that patients should run the show, a remarkably simple formula for success. This patient democracy, if you will, shapes the delivery of health care to the community and determines the range of affordable services the health center will provide.

And those services are certainly needed. Despite our best efforts, there are still far too many Americans who lack health insurance and for whom community health centers are their only source of care. These vulnerable individuals need the Community Health Centers program to remain strong and vibrant as they work toward greater health security for themselves and their families.

The authorization for this valuable program expires this year; however, I have introduced legislation with our colleague from Texas (Mr. Gene Green) to reauthorize the Federal health center program through 2011. Our bill would authorize $1.93 billion in funding in fiscal year 2007, thereby increasing funding next year to the level the President has requested, or approximately $181 million more than last year.

Although we introduced the bill only a few weeks ago, I am pleased that it already has 233 bipartisan cosponsors, more than half the House, including almost every member of the Energy and Commerce Committee. I believe these numbers are a testament to the broad and bipartisan support for reauthorizing the Federal health center program this year while preserving the key elements of its authorizing statute.

The bill we are considering today is identical to the Bilirakis-Green bill, except it includes specific authorization levels for fiscal years 2008 through 2011, which would bring health center funding to $2.04 billion by fiscal year 2011 and allow for the continued expansion of health centers in needed areas around the country.

I certainly want to thank our full committee chairman, Mr. Barton, and our subcommittee chairman, Mr. Deal, for acting expeditiously on reauthorizing this important program.

Although I am pleased the bill before us today maintains the fundamental structure of the Federal health center program, I do support making what I believe are commonsense legislative changes to enhance the ability of community health centers to provide care to those who need it, and, hopefully in the coming weeks, to examining the merits of several of the proposals which my committee colleagues have put forth that I believe would do just that.

I am especially supportive of H.R. 1313, legislation our colleague from Pennsylvania (Mr. Murphy) has introduced, which would extend liability protection to volunteer physicians at community health centers. I believe that this change, which the National Association of Community Health Centers fully supports, will encourage doctors and other medical professionals to volunteer their time and talent at health centers in underserved areas which are facing workforce shortages.

I believe that it is imperative we move forward on Mr. Murphy's legislation as soon as possible. There currently, as we know, is a serious shortage of health care providers in areas where community health centers are located. In addition, there will be an increasing demand for physicians to serve the millions of new patients that will be seeking care as centers come on line as part of President Bush's initiative to put new community health centers in medically underserved areas around the country.

As many of us know, the high cost of medical liability insurance can be prohibitive, especially for physicians who are going above and beyond, so to speak, by volunteering at community health centers. The bill that Mr. Murphy has introduced, which I have cosponsored, would do that by extending the medical liability protections under the Federal Tort Claims Act to volunteer physicians at community health centers.

I believe this commonsense proposal would encourage more qualified health care providers to volunteer their much-needed services at health centers that desperately need their expertise. Although I would have preferred, Mr. Speaker, to also be considering this legislation here today, I am nonetheless, of course, fully supportive of the bill and urge its passage.

Mr. Speaker, community health centers have deservedly earned bipartisan support in Congress because of their long and well- documented record of success. This bill will help them continue their mission well into the future, especially in the most needed areas around the country. I urge all our colleagues to both support and invest in proven health care solutions by voting for H.R. 5573. The health and well-being of our constituents depends on it.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to support H. Res. 861 and to stand beside the members of our armed services who have gallantly fought and died for our freedom.

Early in the morning on September 11, 2001, our Nation was at peace. Then at mid-morning a group of terrorists attacked us. What had we done to deserve such an attack? We saved the world from fascism in the 1940s; then rather than punish our enemies, we helped them rebuild their war-torn countries. We saved the world from communism and helped those who were trapped in darkness behind the Iron Curtain see the light of freedom. We are the world's first responders to every emergency, but because a group of murderous cowards hate our way of life, our liberty, and our compassion and values, they attacked us.

Last September, I traveled to Iraq and had the privilege of seeing firsthand our troops' brave actions in combating terrorism. I spent a great deal of time listening to them and learning their perspectives. And these perspectives are contrary to what the American people hear from the media.

Their morale is extremely high and they are proud to serve their country. They believe that we are winning the fight against terrorism and that perseverance and patience will ensure our long-term victory. The most moving part of my trip came when I visited the Air Force Theater Hospital in Balad, Iraq. I was not surprised, but deeply touched, to see that all those I spoke with who were wounded in combat were eager to return to their units.

Mr. Speaker, I respect every Member's opinion on this extremely important subject. However, I submit that we cannot say we support our troops and also continue this overheated political rhetoric about Iraq being a mistake or an ``un-winnable war.'' This undermines the efforts of our troops and jeopardizes our mission--just as was done during the Vietnam war. Having served on active duty for 4 years in the early 50s, I understand that.

Our brave men and women are winning this fight for us in the streets of Baghdad so we don't have to face terrorists on the streets of America. As long as I am in this body, I will continue to fight for our troops and veterans and I ask my colleagues to do the same.

Madam Speaker, I rise proudly today to celebrate the 65th anniversary of the Battle of Crete, a World War II event of epic proportions that profoundly impacted on the determination of many countries to resist the aggression of Nazi Germany. This is a story of the sacrifices made by a battered but brave group of individuals thrown together in a combined effort to halt the domination of a smaller, weaker nation by a larger, more powerful aggressor.

Amidst the cataclysm that engulfed the countries of Europe at the time, it seems now preposterous that a small island dared to stand up to the aggressor to preserve its freedom and defend its honor. Today, more than half a century later, the heroic events that took place in the Battle of Crete remain etched in the memory of people around the world. In commemoration of this anniversary, and for the benefit of future generations, I will share a brief account of these events as they unfolded.

In early April 1941, the German army rushed to the aid of their defeated ally, Italy, and invaded Greece. Following a valiant struggle, Greek forces had been pushed entirely off the continent and were forced to take refuge on the island of Crete.

The German army then looked covetously across the sea to Crete because of the British airfields on the island, which could be used by the Allies for air strikes against the oil field of Rumania, thereby denying this vital war commodity to Hitler's forces now preparing for their attack on Russia. If captured, it would also provide air and sea bases from which the Nazis could dominate the eastern Mediterranean and launch air attacks against Allied forces in northern Africa. In fact, the Nazi high command envisioned the capture of Crete to be the first of a series of assaults leading to the Suez Canal. Hitler intended a short, one month, campaign, starting in March. On successful completion, his troops would be reassigned to Russia.

Crete's defenses at the time had been badly neglected due to the deployment of Allied forces in North Africa. GEN Bernard Freyberg of the New Zealand Division was appointed by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill as commander of a small contingent of Allied troops which had been dispatched to the island a few months before and re- enforced by additional troops who had retreated from the Greek mainland.

Early on the morning of May 20, 1941, Crete became the theater of the first and largest German airborne operation of the war. The skies above Crete were filled with more than 8,000 Nazi paratroopers, landing in a massive invasion of the island, which was subjected to heavy bombing and attacks in what became known as ``Operation Mercury.''

Waves of bombers pounded the Allied positions followed by a full- scale airborne assault. Elite paratroopers and glider-borne infantry units fell upon the rag-tag Allied soldiers and were met with ferocious resistance from the Allied troops and the Cretan population.

Although General Freyberg had decided not to arm the Cretans because they were believed to be anti-royalist, they fought bravely with whatever was at hand during the invasion. As soon as the battle broke out, the people of Crete volunteered to serve in the militia. Centuries of oppression and several revolts against Venetians and Turks had taught them that freedom is won and preserved by sacrifice, and there was hardly a family without a gun stashed somewhere in the house. For the first time, the Germans met stiff partisan resistance.

War-seasoned men joined the regular troops in the effort to repel the invader. Old men, women and children participated and used whatever makeshift weapons they could find. The pointed their antiquated guns at the descending German paratroopers. They used sticks, sickles and even their bare hands to fight those soldiers already on the ground. Most of them were illiterate villagers but their intuition, honed by the mortal risk they were facing, led them to fight with courage and bravery. ``Aim for the legs and you'll get them in the heart,'' was the popular motto that summarized their hastily acquired battle experience.

Seven days later, the defenders of Crete--though clinging to their rocky defensive positions--knew that they would soon be overrun. The evacuation order was given, and nearly 18,000 men were rescued. These valiant survivors had bought the Allies a week's precious time free of Nazi air and sea attacks based from Crete. More importantly, they inflicted severe losses on the German airborne forces, the showpieces of the Nazi army. Although well-armed and thoroughly equipped, the Germans didn't break the Cretans' love of freedom.

Although the Germans captured the island in 10 days, they paid a heavy price. Of the 8,100 paratroopers involved in this operation, close to 4,000 were killed and 1,600 were wounded. So injured were the German units that they never again attempted an airborne assault of the magnitude launched at Crete. Hitler may have won the Battle of Crete, but he lost the war. The German victory proved a hollow one, as Crete became the graveyard of the German parachute troops. In fact, it is a lesson taught in almost every major military academy in the world on what not to do.

In retaliation for the losses they incurred, the Nazis spread punishment, terror and death on the innocent civilians of the island. More than 2,000 Cretans were executed during the first month alone and thousands more later. Despite these atrocities, for the 4 years following the Allied withdrawal from the island, the people of Crete put up a courageous guerrilla resistance, aided by a few British and Allied officers and troops who remained. Those involved were known as the Andartes (the Rebels).

Cretan people of all ages joined or aided the Andartes. Children would pile rocks in the roads to slow down the German convoys. They even carried messages in their schoolbooks because it was the only place that the German soldiers never looked. These messages contained information critical to the Andartes who were hiding in the mountains and would come down for midnight raids or daytime sabotages.

The German terror campaign was meant to break the fighting spirit and morale of the Andartes. Besides the random and frequent executions, German soldiers used other means to achieve their goal. They leveled many buildings in the towns and villages, destroyed religious icons, and locked hundreds of Cretans in churches for days without food or water, but nothing worked. These actions only made the Cretans more ferocious in their quest for freedom.

Even in the face of certain death while standing in line to be executed, Cretans did not beg for their lives. This shocked the German troops. Kurt Student, the German paratrooper commander who planned the invasion, said of the Cretans, ``I have never seen such a defiance of death.''

Finally, the Cretan people participated in one of the most daring operations that brought shame and humiliation to the German occupation forces and exhilaration and hope to the enslaved peoples of Europe. Major-General Von Kreipe, commander of all German forces in Crete, was abducted from his own headquarters in April 1944 and transferred to a POW camp in England.

The German troops had never encountered such resistance. Hitler had initially sent 12,000 troops to Crete, thinking that the occupation

would be swift. By the end of the 3\1/2\ years of occupation, Hitler had sent a total of 100,000 troops, to confront a little more than 5,000 Cretan Andarte fighters. These German troops could have been deployed somewhere else. More German troops were lost during the occupation of Crete than in France, Yugoslavia and Poland combined.

Most importantly, as a result of the battle in Crete, Hitler's master plan to invade Russia before the coming of winter had to be postponed, which resulted in the deaths of many German troops who were not properly prepared to survive the harsh Russian winter.

As we Americans know from our history, freedom does not come without a price. For their gallant resistance against the German invasion and occupation of their island, Cretans paid a stiff price. Within the first 5 months of the Battle of Crete, 3,500 Cretans were executed and many more were killed in the ensuing 3\1/2\ years of occupation.

Mr. Speaker, there are historical reasons why we Americans appreciate the sacrifices of the Cretan people in defending their island during the Battle of Crete. We have a history replete with similar heroic events starting with our popular revolt that led to the birth of our Nation more than two centuries ago.

We must always remember that as long as there are people willing to sacrifice their lives for the just cause of defending the integrity and freedom of their country, there is always hope for a better tomorrow. May we take inspiration from the shining example of the people of Crete in ensuring that this is indeed the case.

Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the Putnam-Capps amendment to restore the congressional spending moratorium against natural gas leases off the coastline of the national Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).

The repeal of the congressional spending moratorium that was adopted by the Appropriations Committee limits States' ability to safeguard their natural resources and would set current OCS policy badly adrift. The prohibition of OCS drilling has been a national priority for over 20 years. Congress led the way by passing the first moratorium on OCS leasing in 1982, which was soon extended to waters throughout much of our nation's coastal areas.

Opposition to OCS drilling is particularly strong in Florida due to the potentially devastating consequences it could have for our economy, natural resources, and quality of life. Our pristine beaches and waterways represent our best and most distinctive qualities and attract millions of visitors from across the country and world every year. Repealing the moratorium severely jeopardizes Florida's $57 billion tourist economy.

Our natural habitats, particularly our marine life, represent some of the richest and most diverse ecosystems in the world. The quality of life enjoyed by Floridians is due in large part to these natural endowments, which has made my state one of the most desirable places in the country to work and live.

I am also concerned about the impact the repeal of the moratorium could have on our military readiness. The language incorporated into H.R. 5386 poses a serious threat to the critical missions of our Air Force and Navy which are conducted in the Gulf of Mexico. Since the closing of the ranges in Vieques, Puerto Rico, the Gulf of Mexico is home to a number of training missions for our military, specifically those conducted by the U.S. Navy. The Navy uses the Eastern Gulf of Mexico to conduct pre-deployment certifications. Additionally, submerged U.S. Navy submarines launch Tomahawk cruise missiles from the Eastern Gulf of Mexico. If natural gas companies were allowed to begin to explore the area, serious encroachments on these pre-deployment training exercises would be created.

The Air Force also uses the Gulf of Mexico water ranges to do live fire tests and evaluations of many of its new weapons systems. For example, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Initial Training is being located at Eglin Air Force Base. The projected Air-to-Surface live fire weapons training requirements of the F-35 will, according to the Air Armament Center, ``significantly increase the amount or airspace needed over the Eastern Gulf.''

In a letter to the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld wrote that ``Prior analysis and existing agreements recognize that areas east of the 86 deg. 41' line in the Gulf of Mexico commonly known as the `military mission line' are especially critical to DoD due to the number and diversity of military testing and training activities conducted there now, and those planned for the future. In those areas east of the military mission line drilling structures and associated development would be incompatible with military activities, such as missile flights, low-flying drone aircraft, weapons testing, and training.''

The current language in H.R. 5386 could open the entire eastern Gulf of Mexico, including areas east of the military mission line, to natural gas exploration and activities. This is in direct conflict with the statement from Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and a direct threat to the readiness of the United States military.

I urge my colleagues to support the Putnam-Capps amendment.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the memory of a young woman whose life tragically was cut short by her decision not to wear her seatbelt.

Katlyn Marie Marchetti, known as Katie to her family and friends, was a vibrant, loving, community-oriented high school junior who dreamed of a career in fashion or interior design. She encouraged other young women through her participation in the Ophelia Project, a nonprofit group dedicated to encouraging middle and high school girls to believe that an individual's true beauty comes from within.

As a junior at Durant High School in Valrico, Florida, Katie planned to take the SATs in April and spend her summer examining colleges. Her commitment to academic achievement and hard work guaranteed that she would succeed in whatever field she chose. Katie's entire future was ahead of her, and what a bright one it would have been.

But it was not to be. On March 3, 2006, Katie was involved in a car accident that ended up claiming her life early the following morning. To the devastation of her loving parents, Vincent and Laura, and her younger brother, Andrew, she was not wearing her seatbelt. Had she buckled up, March 4 may have been one day closer to realizing her dreams. Instead, it was the day when they were ended.

Unfortunately, Katie's decision to forego wearing a seatbelt is not uncommon. Among the entire population, teenagers are the most likely to neglect this important lifesaving measure. A study conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in 2002 indicated that only 69 percent of 16 to 24-year-olds use seatbelts, compared to 82 percent of children and 76 percent of adults. Among 16 to 19-year-olds, the statistics are more troubling. Only 40 percent use seatbelts consistently. And the Fatality Analysis Reporting System shows that 63 percent of teens killed in crashes were not wearing seatbelts.

Data also reveals insights into why teens neglect to fasten up when they get in a vehicle. According to a 2003 survey, only 79 percent of teen drivers reported that they wear a seatbelt all the time. About 47 percent indicated that safety belts were as likely to harm as to help, and 30 percent said that crashes close to home were usually not as serious. Approximately 30 percent affirmed that they would feel self- conscious if they were going against the group norm in wearing safety belts.

Mr. Speaker, these statistics are troubling. Seatbelt use has proven effective time and again in saving lives. According to NHTSA, the wearing of safety belts saved an estimated 14,164 lives in 2002. Choosing to buckle up is the best protection against drunk, tired, or aggressive drivers. And yet people choose not to take this precaution. What can be done to encourage them to do so?

Studies have shown that highly publicized and visible enforcement of safety belt laws have increased seatbelt use. Peer-led education and awareness also hold promise in changing youth norms and attitudes about seatbelt use. Parental involvement is absolutely critical. Children who observe their parents using seatbelts and obeying traffic laws are more likely to adopt these lifesaving habits.

Vincent and Laura Marchetti imparted this wisdom to their daughter and even prevented her from getting her license until she was 6 months beyond her 16th birthday. They instilled a sense of responsibility in her and practiced driving under all sorts of conditions, but it was not enough.

Technological advances have proven to be one of the most promising catalysts for increased seatbelt use. A study commissioned by NHTSA found that while enhanced safety belt reminders such as buzzers, lights and dashboard messages are aimed at the general population, they may be particularly effective for teenagers. Because teens tend to forget to fasten their seatbelts and are less likely than adults to disengage warning systems, they may be more likely to be persuaded to buckle up by these annoyances.

Mr. Speaker, I encourage the automobile industry to help address this problem by increasing and expanding the manufacture of vehicles with warning systems that do not disengage until the seatbelt is fastened. These systems may save precious young lives.

Mr. Speaker, I didn't know Katie personally, but through my discussions with her parents and brother who are in Washington this week, I know what a special young woman she was. I grieve with them and the rest of their family for their loss. I admire the strength and perseverance of the Marchettis to channel this grief into educating teenagers and their parents about the importance of seatbelt use through the Katie Marchetti Memorial Foundation. I rise today to join their call and to plead with all Americans to ``cross it, click it and live.''

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Don DeHart, a compassionate and caring man who dedicated his life to helping those in need.

Don DeHart grew up in Indiana and quickly became an indispensable part of his father's construction business. He earned three engineering degrees and became the general manager of a successful road construction firm. Don also volunteered as a pastor in remote rural areas, but became restless because, as his wife Eva said, ``he felt there was more to God's work than thicker cushions on pew seats.''

Don and Eva began making mission trips to help impoverished Haitians in the late 1960s. They eventually co-founded ``For Haiti With Love,'' a charity dedicated to providing much needed medical and other services to poor Haitians. The DeHarts eventually moved to Florida to be closer to their mission work.

The DeHarts built a small medical clinic which helped provide basic medical services to some of Haiti's neediest people. Though he was not trained as a medical doctor, Don quickly became an expert on treating bums, which are quite common in Haiti, saving many lives in the process. The DeHarts also helped nourish some of the country's poorest residents in Cap Haitien, Haiti's second-largest city.

Don befriended one of his patients, a young girl named Roseline, who had a crippling spinal condition. Don and Eva brought her to America for surgery, and when her mother died, adopted her. Roseline, now 22, graduated from one of the fine high schools in my congressional district and has taken over her adoptive father's mission.

Mr. Speaker, Don DeHart left this earthly life on April 15 after a long battle against cancer, a disease he had beaten several decades ago. Don lived a life of service and compassion, leaving no doubt that the world is a much better place for having had him in it. I hope his friends and family can take comfort knowing that his legacy will live on long after our warm words of remembrance are forgotten. May he rest in peace and may God watch over his family and those he dedicated his life to helping.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the life and legacy of a true community leader, Willa Carson, who passed away on April 14, 2006, at age 80.

Willa was born in St. Petersburg, Florida, and moved to New York City after marrying Ernest Carson. While in New York, Willa earned her practical nursing license and worked for years in the health care industry. In 1972, Willa returned to Florida, retiring in Clearwater with her husband. However, Willa always needed to help others and was unfulfilled with retirement, so she undertook a second career teaching her passion for nursing to others.

Willa is best known for founding the Greenwood Community Health Resources Center, which she established in 1995. In the beginning, Greenwood operated out of two apartments. Today, this tremendous facility provides free treatment for nearly 600 individuals monthly who have no insurance and little money to afford health care costs. This is especially impressive because the Center only is open three days a week and all the doctors and nurses volunteer their time and expertise. While I am very familiar with the generosity of our nation's health care professionals, I know that this Center would not have been so successful without Willa's tireless efforts to help the poorest in our society.

Last month, the Greenwood Community Health Resources Center was appropriately renamed after Willa Carson. However, this was a tribute Willa did not want or welcome. Humbly, she wanted the Center to be about helping others, not personal glorification.

Willa does not need the Health Resources Center to be renamed after her for her impact on this community to be realized. Her generosity will be reflected on the faces of the countless people that she has helped. I hope her family will take solace in knowing that, in heaven, Willa's loving arms will be able to reach much further than Clearwater, Florida.

Mr. Speaker, our community truly is better off because of Mrs. Carson's contributions. Her leadership, life and legacy are truly an inspiration to everyone. I'm honored to have known her and to have called her a friend. May her memory be eternal!

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the life and legacy of a true American hero, Pvt. Jody Missildine. Tragically, on April 8, 2006, Jody was killed while serving in Tal Afar, Iraq. He was 19 years old.

Jody's dream was to see the world and one day go to college. However, he selflessly did not want to burden his grandparents, Shirley and Melvin, with the financial responsibility that comes with world travel and a four-year degree. He saw the Armed Forces as the best way to achieve his goals, and most importantly, on his own terms. So while still attending high school, Jody signed up for the Army and immediately following his graduation, he left his home in Plant City, Florida, to begin his service to our nation.

Soon Jody's division was deployed to Iraq and despite being several thousand miles away from each other, Jody did his best to stay close to the family he loved so dearly, calling home nearly every week. Always concerned for the well-being of others, Jody rarely spoke about the daily events in Iraq, but rather, he focused his attention on the safety of his family. On Friday, April 7, Jody expressed concerns about Iraq to his grandmother, or Nanna as he called her, during their telephone conversation. Sadly, the next day while on patrol in the northern Iraqi city of Tal Afar, an explosive device detonated near his convoy and killed Jody.

Jody embodied everything that this great country stands for: integrity, hard work, determination, and compassion. He always put others ahead of himself and I am honored to know that this fine young man helped ensure America's continuing independence and security.

Mr. Speaker, as we have seen throughout the history of this nation, freedom is not free; it comes with a heavy price. The sacrifices of brave men and women like Jody have guaranteed this country's continuing liberty. And just as Jody did all he could to protect his family while he was alive, I know he is watching over them from heaven.

I know words can not help fill the emptiness that the Missildine family feels from the loss of Jody. However, I hope they take solace in knowing that our nation is truly stronger and greater for having a man of Jody's character serve it.

May God bless the Missildine family and may He continue to watch over the United States of America.