Mr. Speaker, I would like to insert into the Record the following additional letters of opposition to the Free Trade Agreements with Korea, Panama, and Colombia: A letter from the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America;…
Mr. Speaker, I would like to insert into the Record the following additional letters of opposition to the Free Trade Agreements with Korea, Panama, and Colombia: A letter from the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America; and a letter from the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers.
United Brotherhood of
Carpenters and Joiners of America,
Washington, DC, July 11, 2011.
Dear Member of Congress: On behalf of the over half a
million members of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, I am
writing to urge you to vote against the proposed Free Trade
Agreements with South Korea, Colombia and Panama. Approval of
these three proposals is a vote to undercut American living
standards
The evidence is clear. Over the last twenty years our
government has agreed to similar trade deals with Mexico,
Central America, China and other nations. Each time their
promoters promised the Congress that the agreements would
make America more competitive and create more jobs. Each
time, the result was a widening trade deficit financed by
borrowing from foreigners and a net loss of U.S. jobs. Our
massive indebtedness to China, for example, is a direct
result of the trade deficit that followed the 2000 China
trade agreement.
We now know that these deals were not designed to help U.S.
workers or businesses that produce here. Rather they were
designed to allow multinational corporations to off-shore
production in countries where costs are cheap because workers
are suppressed, the environment is abused and finance is
unregulated.
As in prior trade deals, the new agreements lack
enforceable labor and environmental protections. They allow
foreign companies to challenge U.S. laws on the grounds that
they inhibit foreign competition. And despite the claims of
``free trade,'' they give away access to the U.S. markets
without reciprocal rights for U.S. producers.
Thus, to give one example, under the agreement with Panama,
any company registered in that country--including the
thousands of Chinese and other foreign companies registered
there--will have the right to bid on virtually any
significant U.S. government procurement or construction
project. But American firms are denied access to bid on the
only large scale project of any size in Panama--the widening
of the Panama Canal.
In effect, we would give away American jobs in order that
U.S. multinationals have even greater opportunity to use
Panama's notorious lax and corrupt financial system to escape
U.S. taxes and rules against money laundering.
The negative impact of the deal with South Korea will be
larger. The Economic Policy Institute--which has accurately
forecast the economic impact of prior trade deals--estimates
that the Korean FTA will directly cost Americans at least
160,000 jobs to start. The long term damage will be even
greater. The agreement allows South Korea to export goods
duty-free to the U.S. even if only 35% of the content is
actually produced there. This will open the door for the
transshipment of goods primarily manufactured in places like
China, Vietnam and the totalitarian regime in North Korea.
Moreover, the Korea agreement has no effective provision
for dismantling the labyrinth of non-tariff barriers that
already results in the U.S. selling only 6,000 autos there a
year, while Korea sells us 500,000. Neither does it prohibit
Korea from manipulating its currency to gain competitive
advantage in the same way that China now does.
The proposed deal with Colombia is morally offensive as
well as economically unsound. Colombia has by far the most
brutal record of repression of independent trade unionists in
the world. On nothing but the flimsy promise that they will
do better in the future, our government will be rewarding a
corrupt oligarchy that suppresses workers' efforts to improve
wages and working conditions with beatings, torture and
assassination. Despite claims that the political system there
has ``reformed,'' a record 52 Colombia trade unionists were
murdered last year. Of the 2,800 assassinations of union
leaders over two and a half decades, only five percent of the
cases have been prosecuted.
The primary purpose of the treaty with Colombia is the same
as that of the 2007 treaty with Peru--outsourcing American
jobs. As the Peruvian president told the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce the night the Peru FTA was signed, ``Come and open
your factories in my country so we can sell your own products
back to the U.S.''
The United Brotherhood of Carpenters supports balanced
reciprocal trade agreements that provide the benefits of
economic growth to workers in both the U.S. and its trading
partners. Under any circumstances, these
current proposals would not meet this commonsense test.
Today, at a time of high joblessness, deteriorating wages and
shrinking work opportunities, our members and their families
have little tolerance for trade policies that will make their
lives worse and their country weaker.
The only responsible vote is no.
Sincerely,
Douglas J. McCarron,
General President.