Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 983) to Amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disapprove courses of education offered by a public institution of higher learning…
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 983) to Amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disapprove courses of education offered by a public institution of higher learning that does not charge the in-State tuition rate to a veteran using certain educational assistance under title 10 of such Code, and for other purposes.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks on
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 983, offered by my friend and colleague, the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Van Orden).
This bill would reduce tuition costs for Montgomery GI Bill Selected reservists by making them eligible for the same in-State tuition waivers.
When a veteran uses other education benefits offered by VA, they are able to receive an in-State tuition. It is time to include MGIB Selected Reserves as another benefit that uses in-State tuition.
Last Congress, under the Republican majority, the House passed legislation that would streamline benefits and protect taxpayers. This bill would continue that mission in the 119th Congress.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to support H.R. 983, and I reserve the balance of my time.
April 1, 2025.
Hon. Mike Bost,
Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Bost: H.R. 983, the ``Montgomery GI Bill
Selected Reserves Tuition Fairness Act of 2025'', was
referred primarily to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs,
with an additional referral to the Committee on Armed
Services.
H.R. 983 contains provisions within the Committee on Armed
Services' Rule X jurisdiction. As a result of your having
consulted with the Committee and to expedite this bill for
floor consideration, the Committee on Armed Services will
forego action on the bill. This is being done based on our
mutual understanding that doing so will in no way diminish or
alter the jurisdiction of the Committee on Armed Services
with respect to the appointment of conferees, or to any
future jurisdictional claim over the subject matters
contained in the bill or similar bills.
I would appreciate your response to this letter confirming
this understanding, and would request that you include a copy
of this letter and your response in the committee report or
in the Congressional Record during floor consideration of
this bill. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Mike Rogers,
Chairman.
Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Van Orden).
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, once again, we are seeing fear-mongering from the other side of the aisle.
VA's decision to phase out the Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase program, or VASP program, is an important step by the Trump administration.
Last Congress, the Biden-Harris administration, during an election year, created VASP instead of implementing a partial-claim program. This decision added billions of dollars to the VA budget without any assurance to the taxpayer that this was a good decision.
The average amount that a veteran had to pay back in their mortgage was less than $25,000. Instead of solving the problem, VA chose to purchase the entire loan, which, on average, was about $321,000. In no way does this make sense to solve a $25,000 problem with a $320,000 solution. Therein lies the problem with our colleagues across the aisle.
Rather than being wise and trying to fix it for the veterans and for the veterans in the future, Democrats instead do a political thing during an election year that ends up costing the taxpayers. I will say it again that veterans are taxpayers.
This is why, under my leadership, House Republicans have a solution, the alarm on the Biden administration program and the risk it could bring to VA home loans.
This is also why House Republicans have a solution in this problem, H.R. 1815, introduced by my friend, Representative Van Orden.
Mr. Speaker, if the ranking member is so concerned about the veterans, I ask him and his side of the aisle why my Democratic colleagues haven't introduced a solution to aid veterans and still make sure that it actually deals with the veterans' problems, not just all of a sudden spends not only more money than they have to fix their problem, but creating a problem for other veterans because Democrats are going to drain this system.
Now, I welcome the ranking member and other colleagues on the other side of the aisle to cosponsor Mr. Van Orden's legislation and get it out of the House to the Senate. Instead of complaining, the ranking member should join us in this legislation. I, once again, encourage people to get back to the issue at hand and support the bill that we were debating before.
Mr. Speaker, I encourage all of our colleagues to vote for that bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.