Mr. Speaker, this evening as I do each Tuesday evening that the United States House of Representatives is in session, I rise on behalf of the 37-Member-strong fiscally conservative Democratic Blue Dog Coalition. As you walk the halls of…
Mr. Speaker, this evening as I do each Tuesday evening that the United States House of Representatives is in session, I rise on behalf of the 37-Member-strong fiscally conservative Democratic Blue Dog Coalition.
As you walk the halls of Congress, as you walk the halls of the Cannon House Office Building, the Longworth House Office Building and the Rayburn House Office Building, it is easy to spot an office that belongs to one of the 37 Members of the fiscally conservative Democratic Blue Dog Coalition, because you will find this poster as a welcome mat by each door of a Blue Dog member.
As you can see, today the U.S. national debt is $8,419,147,820,878 and some change. Your share of the national debt, that is every living man, woman and child, including the children born today, every American citizen's share of the national debt is $28,134.
As Members of the Blue Dog Coalition, it is what we call the debt tax, d-e-b-t, and that is one tax that cannot go away until this Republican Congress and this administration gets our Nation's fiscal house in order.
Last week, the President made a big announcement about how the deficit really was not as bad as what his White House had first thought and reported it would be. I think the best way to sum up the events of last week can be found in an editorial, July 11, 2006, from the Los Angeles Times entitled ``Another Mission Accomplished,''
And I will not read the entire editorial, but I think it sets the stage for what we plan the spend the next hour discussing this evening. It starts off like this: ``The release of the White House mid-session budget review is an annual event normally marked by a few wonkish observations and the routine updating of various spreadsheets, not by a full-dressed Presidential dog-and-pony show. But President Bush plans to preside today with Members of Congress and invited guests in attendance. By all indications, including his own, in his weekly radio address last Saturday, he plans to turn this into a celebration just in time for the fall campaign.''
The editorial from the Los Angeles times dated July 11, 2006 continues. ``This is proof, if anyone still needs it, that this administration is desperate for something to boast about. On Mr. Bush's watch, triple-digit budget surpluses have turned into annual triple- digit budget deficits.
``There is no information in the mid-session report to alter that utterly dispiriting fact. Yes, the report is expected to project that this year's deficit will be somewhat less gargantuan than last year's, probably somewhere between $280 and $300 billion versus a $318 billion shortfall in 2005.''
And it concludes, that part of the editorial, by saying, ``That is not much to crow about.'' Well, they are right. Last week the administration released its mid-session review of the budget. And after further examination, let's take a closer look at what the report actually tells us.
The report actually tells us that what we have here is another record deficit. The administration's updated estimate of $296 billion deficit makes 2006 one of the four largest deficits in our Nation's history. It is hard now to believe that we had a balanced budget in this country from 1998 to 2001. But it did not take this administration and this Republican-led Congress very long to turn fiscal responsibility into record deficits.
As you can see, the largest deficit ever in our Nation's history occurred in 2004 when the Republicans controlled the White House, the House, and the Senate. It was $413 billion in red ink, in hot checks, if you will.
The year 2003 was the second largest deficit ever in our Nation's history, where, for the first time in over 50 years, the Republicans controlled the White House, the House and Senate, and they gave us the second largest deficit ever in our Nation's history, $378 billion.
The third largest record deficit ever in our Nation's history again occurred while the Republicans controlled the White House, the House, and the Senate. It was in 2005, and it was $318 billion deficit, the third largest deficit ever in our Nation's history.
Then this year, the President has a press conference, has a grand ceremony and event to announce that the deficit for fiscal year 2006 is only $296 billion, the fourth largest deficit ever in our Nation's history. I think the editorial in the Los Angeles Times had it right when it said that is not much to crow about.
The administration's updated estimate of $296 billion deficit, as I indicated, makes 2006 the fourth largest deficit ever in our Nation's history.
While this number represents an improvement over the 2005 deficit of $318 billion, it still ranks as the fourth largest deficit ever in our Nation's history. These revised estimates do not account for the extent of our budget problems, because they include in the calculation the annual surpluses in Social Security.
The first bill I filed as a Member of Congress when I got here in 2001 was a bill to tell the politicians in Washington to keep their hands off the Social Security trust fund. This Republican Congress refused to give me a hearing or a vote on that bill, and now we know why, because they are raiding the Social Security trust fund to fund tax cuts for those earning over $400,000 a year.
They are raiding the Social Security trust fund to fund this out-of- control deficit, this out-of-control debt, this reckless spending that we are seeing occurring in our Nation's capital and the way the Republican leadership is running our government and this country. In fact, when the Social Security surplus is excluded, as it should be, the 2006 deficit is not $296 billion; it is $473 billion.
Now, throughout the evening we are going to be talking more about this, including projected surpluses, and how they became huge deficits. I will talk more about that in a little bit, but I have been joined this evening by the cochair for policy for the Blue Dog Coalition, Jim Cooper from Tennessee. Glad to have you with us this evening.
The gentleman from Tennessee makes an excellent point about how we have gotten into this mess with these record deficits. This Republican Congress, this administration, gave us a so-called Medicare part D prescription drug plan. We all want our seniors to be able to have access and be able to afford the medicine that they so desperately need.
I thought that we were going to pass a bipartisan meaningful benefit for our seniors, but instead we passed a bill that was written by the big drug manufacturers. In fact, the chairman of the committee writing the bill at the time left the committee and took a multimillion dollar job as the head of PhRMA, the association in Washington D.C. that represents the big drug manufacturers.
Now, every State in America, through its Medicaid programming was negotiating with the drug manufacturers to reduce the cost that those States paid for the Medicaid program.
When this Medicare part D program became law, they shifted Medicare- eligible seniors that were poor enough to be on Medicaid away from Medicaid and on to Medicare and into a bill that actually has language in the legislation.
I thought this was going to be a bill to help our seniors with the high cost of medicine. But this legislation included language that said the Federal Government shall be prohibited from negotiating with the big drug manufacturers to bring down the high cost of medicine. So we shifted that cost from the States and, more importantly, from the big drug manufacturers, because every manufacturer out there was giving rebates to the States to help offset the costs to the program and to a Federal program where the Federal Government is prohibited from negotiating with the big drug companies to bring down the high cost of medicine.
We are seeing, as a result of that, our seniors not really getting that good of a benefit, and yet it is a program that is causing these deficits to go up.
Mr. Speaker, I thought we would go through a few other charts that we have here and talk a little bit more about this entire discussion about the projected surpluses becoming huge deficits.
When the administration took office in 2001, it had an advantage no administration in recent times has enjoyed, a 10-year projected surplus of $5.6 trillion. The administration has replaced that surplus with recurring deficits and a record debt.
When the cost of items omitted from the mid-session review are included, the deterioration in the budget between 2002 and 2011 is about $8.5 trillion. Although these numbers are more positive than the administration's February forecast, which some would argue they inflated again so they could boast now about not having the largest deficit in our Nation's history, but rather having the fourth largest deficit in our Nation's history, they unfortunately do not represent any significant improvement in the long-term budget picture.
Even the administration's 5-year forecast, which omits the cost of certain planned policies, never shows a deficit smaller than $123 billion. You can see here in 2000 we had a real, actual surplus of $236 billion. In 2001, we had a projected surplus of $281 billion, which in the end result ended up being $128 billion.
And then as you can see, when the Bush administration came here, surpluses were projected for year 2002 through 2006; but, instead, we got deficits, including four of the largest deficits ever in our Nation's history. This was a $610 billion swing from having the first balanced budget in 40 years to having the largest debt ever in our Nation's history and having the largest deficit ever in our Nation's history for 4 years in a row.
I yield to the gentleman from Tennessee.
This administration has told us for 5\1/2\ years now that if you cut taxes on folks earning over $400,000 a year, I do not have a lot of folks in my district who earn that kind of money, but this administration, this Republican-led Congress, for 5\1/2\ years has been telling us about that trickle down business, that if you cut taxes on those earning over $400,000 a year, it will eventually trickle down to everyone else and stimulate the economy and bring in new revenues and, therefore, a stronger economy and a stronger government.
Well, as you can see here, the realistic estimate shows a bleak deficit outlook for those tax cuts for people earning over $400,000 a year. All they have gotten us is in the business whereas of today our Nation is borrowing $1 billion a year, 45 percent of which we are borrowing from places like China, Japan, Hong Kong and Korea and, oh, yeah, OPEC nations.
In fact, these tax cuts for folks earning over $400,000 a year, what they have gotten us is not only a record debt and record deficit and in the business of borrowing $1 billion a day. It has also resulted in our Nation spending a half a billion dollars every day simply paying interest on the debt we have already got.
Again, as Blue Dog members, fiscally conservative Democrats, we coined the phrase the ``debt tax,'' D-E-B-T, which is one tax that cannot be cut, cannot go away until we get our Nation's fiscal house in order.
As you can see, we had actual deficits back in the 1980s and the 1990s; and then in 1998, under the leadership of President Clinton, we popped into a surplus, first time a Democrat or Republican had done that in 40 years. We saw a surplus. We saw a balanced budget from 1998 through 2001, and then look what happened, and then tax cuts for those earning over $400,000 a year, and we started seeing record deficits.
This administration, this Republican-led Congress have given us four of the largest deficits ever, ever in our Nation's history. The administration's estimated future deficits failed to include the full cost of items on its agenda; and once likely costs are included, the deficit is never better than $229 billion for the foreseeable future.
The true state of the budget is worse than the administration's forecast depicts because it omits certain costs. When realistic adjustments are made for omitted items, annual deficits never improve to better than $229 billion for any year over the next decade, and by 2016, the deficit grows to $444 billion.
I think it is important to note that the administration's new estimates for the war in Iraq and Afghanistan reflect a total of $110 billion for 2007, $60 billion more than the President's February budget. However, beyond 2008, the administration provides no further funding for these efforts. It is like the White House is telling us that everything will be rosy in Iraq, Afghanistan and all of our troops will be able to come home by 2008.
It is time for some truthful budgeting in our government. Based on a model presented by the Congressional Budget Office, CBO, costs for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan could run as much as $371 billion over the next 10 years, from 2007 to 2016, and this calculation is likely conservative.
I have Middle East experts at the State Department telling me that we will be in a situation that is costing us billions of dollars in Iraq at least for 10 years, some believe for as much as 30 or 35 years; and yet this administration can look the American people in the eye with an honest look and an honest face and say that there is no reason to budget for the war beyond 2008.
It is time for this administration and this Republican-led Congress to be truthful with the American people and to give this government, to give the people of this country an honest budget.
The report also estimates that the President's plan to partially privatize Social Security will worsen the unified deficit by $721 billion over the next 10 years.
Finally, the report does not include the cost of addressing Medicare physician payments which must be addressed. A long-term fix could cost
from $127 billion to $275 billion over the next 10 years in the absence of other policy changes, another omission from the numbers presented to us in this mid-year report that the President presented last week.
I am also joined this evening by our cochair for communication with the 37-member strong fiscally conservative Democratic Blue Dog Coalition, and that is the gentleman from California (Mr. Cardoza) who I yield to.
Will the gentleman yield?
Actually, my office received a call today from the GAO, and I have got some good news. We have been saying, I have been saying, that the GAO reported that 19 of 24 Federal agencies were not in compliance with all Federal accounting audit standards and could not fully explain how they had spent taxpayer money appropriated by Congress. I am here to correct that. The GAO convinced me today that that statement is not true. Here is what they tell me is true: that the GAO reports that 18 of 24, not 19; 18 of 24 major Federal agencies have such bad financial systems that they don't even know the true cost of running some of their programs. I don't really see the difference, one sounds about as bad as the other to me, but the good news is we no longer have 19 of 24 major Federal agencies that can't produce a clean audit. Instead, we have 18 of 24 major Federal agencies that have such bad financial systems that they don't even know the true cost of running some of their programs.
And yet Republican leaders in this Congress did not force these agencies to fully account for how the money was being spent before doling out billions more of taxpayer dollars for the same programs. And that is why I am so proud of our 37-member strong, fiscally conservative Democratic Blue Dog Coalition for coming forward, not just to criticize the Republican leadership on this. You can bet we are going to hold them accountable. But we are going to do much more than that.
We have offered up a bill, it is led by one of the founders of our Blue Dog Coalition, Mr. Tanner of Tennessee, and you have been discussing that bill in your comments tonight, and I appreciate you doing that. It is about accountability, and it is about restoring some common sense and accountability to our government.
And with that I will yield back to the gentleman from California.
I share your concern because we have been sent here. We have been sent here by the people to be their representatives. And part of being their representatives is to ensure that their tax money is being accounted for and being spent in a meaningful way and in a way that we would deem responsible.
It kind of reminds me growing up at that little country Methodist church just outside of Prescott in Hope, Arkansas, Midway United Methodist Church. I still try to get back there every year for homecoming. My parents still go there. My mom still plays the piano there.
And growing up there at Midway United Methodist Church, every Sunday I heard the preacher talk about being a good steward. Being a good steward. And I think that the American people have sent us here and expect us to be good stewards of their tax money and make sure that it is being accounted for and make sure that it is being spent in a responsible way, a way that will help lift people up, a way that will invest in their children and their education and their future. And that is why I am so very concerned about this.
That is why we are pleased to offer up a 12-point plan for budget reform, to cure our Nation's addiction to deficit spending. That is why, as Blue Dog members, we are pleased to offer up this accountability plan under the leadership of Mr. Tanner, one of the founders of the Blue Dogs, and that is why I am so pleased to be a part of your legislation, Mr. Cardoza, another part of our Blue Dog package, to basically tell Cabinet-level agencies that Mr. Secretary, Madam Secretary, if you can't produce a clean audit, then you have got to go back to the Senate and have a reconfirmation hearing.
And there is another bill that you have got that I am real proud of, and that is, again, about being good stewards, about the public trust that is being placed in us to come here and to represent the people from back home. They place a lot of trust in us. And when we violate that trust, when we break the laws that we helped write as Members of Congress, we shouldn't be held to the same standards as every other citizen in this country. We should be held to a much greater standard. And we should have to serve even
longer prison terms and have even bigger fines than everyone else, because if we are going to come here and violate the public trust and break the laws that we helped write, we should be held to an even more strict standard.
And I am proud of the bill that we have on that. And I will yield to the gentleman from California to describe that piece of legislation
You have been there.
I just want to quickly make the point as I do every Tuesday and I am going to as long as these things are still down there. But the reason that we have House Resolution 841 by Mr. Tanner and those of us in the Blue Dog Coalition, this is a bill about accountability and about holding agencies accountable. This is why we need legislation to restore accountability within our government.
I don't know how good you can see this, Mr. Speaker, but this is the airport in Hope, Arkansas. Hope used to be known for something else. Now we are known for the trailer houses, mobile homes, manufactured homes. As you can see, this is an active runway at the Hope Airport. And these are old World War II proving ground runways that are no longer being used. So FEMA decides they are going to go out and buy about 20,000 brand-new, fully furnished, microwaves built in, whirlpool tubs built in. We have been in them. We have seen them.
I don't know if they are Jacuzzi brand but they are whirlpool.
They are fully furnished, 16-foot wide, 60-foot long mobile homes, about a half a billion dollars worth of them. And they are parked here at the airport in Hope, Arkansas. Except the theory was they were going to bring them in and then take them to the storm victims from Hurricane Katrina. We are coming up on the first anniversary of Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita. And so the theory was that they were going to be coming in and then going out. This would be a FEMA staging area.
Well, they all came and never went. And as a result, they quickly filled up these old World War II-era proving ground runways and started parking them just in the hay meadow. I mean, just literally on the pasture.
And then the Inspector General noted that with the rains they were going to start sinking this past spring. Lord knows, we would love to have rain now. It is awful hot and dry in Arkansas.
But FEMA's response was not to get the homes to the people who need them. FEMA's response was to spend 4 to $7 million putting gravel on 200 acres of hay meadow pasture land at the Hope Airport to keep these mobile homes from sinking.
The bottom line is, if you can't really get a good look at it there, if you have ever wondered what 9,959 mobile homes look like, that is what it looks like. At one time we had 10,777. We finally have got it down to 9,959. But this is a better look of what it looks like. I mean, there is a fence, barbed wire fence and pasture. They are just sitting there on the areas. Here, as you can see, 16-foot wide, 60-foot long, mobile homes; 9,959 of them sitting there at the airport in Hope, Arkansas, 450 miles from the eye of Hurricane Katrina nearly a year after the storm.
Now, FEMA buys these for victims of Hurricane Katrina; and then FEMA says, well, we are not going to put them in a flood plain. Well, everybody that lost their home and their housing in Hurricane Katrina, they loss it because they lived in a flood plain.
It is time to restore some common sense to FEMA, and it is time to find a good use, a responsible use of these 9,959 mobile homes that are simply parked there at the airport in Hope, Arkansas, an example of mismanagement by a Federal agency. Example of mismanagement by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. An example of why we need to restore accountability in our government. And I am not going to let up on this until every single one of these mobile homes that taxpayers have paid for, about $400 billion worth, are put to good use.
They are not serving anybody any purpose. They are not doing anyone any good sitting in a hay meadow at the Hope Airport in Hope, Arkansas.
This is a symbol of what is wrong with this administration. This is a symbol of what is wrong with this Republican-led Congress. It is a symbol of what is wrong with the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
I yield back to the gentleman from California.
Since President Bush took office, the amount of foreign- held Treasury debt has more than doubled, increasing from $1 trillion to $2.1 trillion, meaning that this administration has already accrued more foreign debt than the previous 42 Presidents combined.
Let me repeat that. This President and this Republican-led Congress has borrowed more money from foreign central banks and foreign investors than the previous 42 Presidents combined.
As you can see here in 2001, the amount of money borrowed from foreign central banks and from foreign investors was $988 billion. That was troubling enough. In 2006, we are up to $2.66 trillion that has been borrowed from foreigners. Unlike deficits in earlier years, current deficits have been primarily financed by foreign investors with the rise in foreign-held debt equaling three-fourths the increase in publicly-held debt since the start of the current administration in 2001.
This rise in foreign-held debt is troubling because it makes our economy beholden to foreign creditors and represents another financial burden passed on to future generations. Foreign-held debt is fundamentally different from domestically-held debt, since the interest payments on foreign-held debt flow outside the United States of America and reduce Americans' standard of living.
The cost of servicing foreign-held debt is high. Local, State, and Federal Government interest rates to foreign investors totaled $114 billion in 2005, an amount that will grow rapidly if the Treasury continues to sell debt to foreign investors at the current rate. Compare this to only $23 billion in foreign holdings in 1993. Today, the debt, the foreign-held debt, is $2.1 trillion.
And just like David Letterman, I have got a ``top ten list.'' The top ten current lenders, again, our government is borrowing $1 billion a day. We keep passing tax cuts for those earning over $400,000 a year. And where does the money come from? We have got record deficits. Where is the money coming from to give tax cuts to those earning over $400,000 a year?
Here is the top ten: Japan, our Nation has borrowed $640.1 billion from Japan; China, $321.4 billion.
Yes.
That would be Red China, Communist China. Our Nation has borrowed $321.4 billion from China to fund tax cuts for folks earning over $400,000 a year at home, leaving our children and grandchildren to foot the bill. That may be a tax cut for the wealthiest people in this country now, but it is nothing more than a tax increase on our children and our grandchildren.
The United Kingdom, $179.5 billion. OPEC, imagine that one, OPEC, our Nation has borrowed $98 billion from OPEC. And we wonder why gasoline is approaching $3 a gallon.
Korea, $72.4 billion; Taiwan, $68.9 billion; the Caribbean banking centers, $61.7 billion; Hong Kong, $46.6 billion; Germany, $46.5 billion. And get a load of this, rounding off the top ten: Our Nation has borrowed $40.1 billion from Mexico to fund this reckless spending, these record deficits and this record debt given to us by this Republican Congress and this administration.
Now, as members of the Blue Dog Coalition, why do we raise this issue? We have got just a few minutes left here. We raise it because our Nation is borrowing $1 billion a day. Never mind that. On top of that, we are spending a half billion dollars a day paying interest on the debt we have already got. That is a half billion dollars a day that cannot go for education, cannot go for health care, cannot go for infrastructure improvements. It has got to go to service the debt. It has got to pay back these foreign countries, these foreign central banks and foreign investors that are funding these record debts and record deficits in this country.
In fact, as you can see here, like interest payments on a family's credit card, every dollar spent on the national debt is a dollar that does not educate a child, build a road, or keep the Nation secure. Because of recent record deficits, the government's annual interest payment is the fastest growing category of Federal spending over the next 5 years and has posted double-digit percentage growth for the past 2 years. Interest payments dwarf spending on most national priorities such as homeland security, education, and veterans health care. By 2011 annual interest payments under the administration's proposed budget will grow to $302 billion, a 38 percent increase from the current level. As you can see here, the amount of money we are spending in billions of dollars simply paying interest on the national debt, this is the amount of money going to pay interest on the national debt. This is the amount of money being spent to educate our children. This is the amount of money going for homeland security to keep America secure. And this is the amount of money going to keep our promises to our veterans. America's priorities are not being met because of this Republican Congress' reckless fiscal mess.
It is time to put an end to these record debts and record deficits. It is time to restore some common sense and fiscal discipline to our Nation's government.
Mr. Speaker, if you have any comments, questions, or concerns about what we have been discussing in the past hour, you can e-mail us, Mr. Speaker, at [email protected]. That is [email protected].
I want to thank the gentleman from California for joining me this evening.
As we are out of time, I want to leave you with how we started. When we started this hour, I pointed out the national debt was $8,419,147,820,878 and that every living soul in America's share was $28,134.
Just in the hour that we have been discussing trying to restore some common sense and fiscal discipline to our Nation's government, this number, our Nation's debt has gone up another $41 million, roughly another $41.666 million.
As members of the 37-member strong fiscally conservative Democratic Blue Dog Coalition, we come to this floor of the United States House of Representatives every Tuesday night to talk about restoring accountability and fiscal discipline to our Nation's government. We are going to hold the Republican leadership accountable for the reckless spending and the lack of accountability, but we are also going to offer up commonsense solutions to fix these problems, to ensure that we leave this country just a little bit better than we found it for the next generation.
Does the gentleman from California have any closing thoughts?