Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this amendment. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Meuser), my good friend. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from California (Mr. Calvert), my good…
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this amendment.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Meuser), my good friend.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from California (Mr. Calvert), my good friend.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Cline), another great friend.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Barr), a mediocre friend, not a great friend.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Fallon), another mediocre friend.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered.
Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed.
Amendments En Bloc No. 4 Offered by Ms. Lofgren of California.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the en bloc. I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Reed), a good friend and a problem solver.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Fitzpatrick), who can take you on a tour of the best Philly cheesesteak places in the world.
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Naples, Florida, (Mr. Donalds), my good friend, who represents many of my former constituents from Illinois who have left Illinois because of overtaxation.
Madam Speaker, I yield an additional 15 seconds to the gentleman.
Madam Speaker, before I reserve, can I make a parliamentary inquiry?
When a mask falls down unintentionally from a speaker, what is the rule?
Is this being enforced equally on the majority and minority?
So I should ask the second-rate parliamentarian off the floor?
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Van Drew), my good friend and best- dressed member of our conference.
Madam Speaker, I include in the Record a summary of letters submitted yesterday by the Institute for Free Speech and others opposing
Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Madam Speaker, over the last couple of days, I have spoken a lot about my opposition to this bill's creation of a public fund filled with dollars from corporate fines to directly fund the campaign coffers of every Member of this institution and candidates.
And my Democrat colleagues have continued to say this isn't public funding or corporate donations because it is corporate fines.
So what is the truth?
I think my chart here tells the story. So we have corporate fines. That is corporate dollars, something that we, as Members of Congress in our campaigns, cannot accept right now. Those corporate dollars that pay these corporate fines that we set the levels of in this institution, they then go to the U.S. Government in this new--that H.R. 1 creates--the Freedom From Influence Fund.
It is really a laundering machine. So they launder that corporate money that we cannot accept right now into the Treasury and it comes out clean as public money. It is money that used to be used for things like the Crime Victims Fund. Instead, this new laundered money, this taxpayer money--because it is public, it is under the control of us-- then goes out exponentially to all of us, to our campaigns to pay for attack ads, fundraisers, mailers, phone calls, whatever you want.
But either way, it is government spending--government sending corporate dollars directly to us. This is, and should be, prohibited, but H.R. 1 changes that and it puts more money into politics and not less.
How about the Crime Victims Fund or victims of domestic violence get these dollars?
Let's make sure that we address programs that deal with sexual assault, child abuse, and other crimes. This money will not go into the Crime Victims Fund because it is going to all of us. All 50 State attorneys general have told us that this vital Crime Victims Fund is nearly depleted. But instead of plussing it up, here we are today, funding our own campaigns with a ``yes'' vote.
Madam Speaker, this bill isn't for the people. It is for the politicians. This is why I am offering a motion to recommit so that we can put forward a bill that works for the American people.
Madam Speaker, if we adopt this motion to recommit, we will instruct the Committee on House Administration to consider an amendment to remove all public financing from this legislation.
Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the Record the text of the amendment immediately prior to the vote on the motion to recommit.
Madam Speaker, it is one reason I am opposed to H.R. 1, and giving Democrats another chance to join me, stopping this charade, stopping enriching themselves in their own campaign. This is one last chance before you do it again.
Madam Speaker, another reason I oppose H.R. 1 is because the election mandates on States in this bill go against what our Founding Fathers intended and essentially nationalizes our election system.
If signed into law, H.R. 1 would be the greatest expansion of the Federal Government's role in our elections than we have ever seen. By moving these decisions to D.C., we are further removing people from the laws that govern their elections. People should have more say in how their elections are run, not less. Our goal is to always ensure all eligible voters are able to vote and all lawful votes are counted. That is not what H.R. 1 does. And the only witness who has run an election before said during the single House Administration hearing held on this bill that H.R. 1 will undermine many of the election laws States have put into place to make it easier for people to vote and improve their election process for their voters.
One-size-fits-all mandates from Washington will not fix the problems we have seen in elections across the country. They will just cause more chaos and confusion. These issues need to be solved at the local and State level. Instead of dictating to States, we should be working with them and localities to address these issues. And I stand ready and willing to work with my Democrat colleagues to do just that, but I will not vote for a Federal takeover of elections and I will not vote to use the Federal Government to put more money into my campaign. It is bad policy and it is bad for the American people.
Madam Speaker, I urge support for the motion to recommit at the appropriate time, and I urge a ``no'' vote on the underlying bill.
Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, I would like to request a meeting with the Parliamentarian. I personally witnessed one of my Democratic colleagues immediately remove his mask and was never told to put it back on from the Chair at the time. So all we ask for is consistency.
Madam Speaker, I urge a ``no'' vote on this bill. I urge support for the motion to recommit. I urge my Democratic colleagues: Don't vote to put money into your own campaigns.
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.