Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to present the fiscal year 2005 District of Columbia appropriations bill. This bill passed out of full committee on July 14. The bill before us totals $560…
Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to present the fiscal year 2005 District of Columbia appropriations bill. This bill passed out of full committee on July 14.
The bill before us totals $560 million in Federal funds and $8.2 billion in local funds. Within this total, the District expects to receive approximately $1.9 billion in Federal grant funds.
The bill is the product of hard work by every member of the Subcommittee on the District of Columbia. I personally want to thank each of them for their input into the bill. I especially want to thank my ranking member, the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Fattah), for his advice, counsel, and support in the development of this bill. I enjoyed working with him on behalf of the city of Washington.
The subcommittee held hearings and visited many local sites, including the District of Columbia public schools and charter schools, and police and fire department facilities, to name just a few. We developed this bill with the input from members of the subcommittee, other House Members, the Mayor and city council, and interested citizens.
I believe that this bill continues Congress's commitment to our Nation's Capital. As with every piece of legislation, there are many deserving projects that could not be accommodated within our funding allocation, but this is a balanced and equitable bill, a bill that everyone can and should support.
I am pleased to note that the District of Columbia continues to make significant progress in improving both its financial and program management. This is the seventh balanced budget the District has submitted to Congress for review; and, once again, the District received a clean audit from the city's independent auditors. The city also had a recent upgrading in its bond rating by Moody's Investors Service to an A rating, and this is the first time the city has received an A rating from all three of the major rating agencies. It should be remembered that it was not long ago that the city's credit rating was the lowest of the low. Mayor Williams and the city council should be commended for their actions.
After detailed review of the budget, the bill continues the Federal commitment began in 1997 for funding the District of Columbia courts as well as the Defender Services and the Court Services and the Defender Supervision Agency and the Public Defender Service. The bill also provides $118.9 million for other high-priority District and congressional programs projects.
Among these: $25.6 million for the recently authorized and very successful resident tuition support program; $15 million for emergency planning and security costs; $10 million for the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority to continue the combined sewer overflow project; $3 million for continued work on the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative; as well as $7 million for the capital development in the District to complete construction of a multiagency unified communications center, which benefits police, fire, EMS, and other city agencies; $6 million for a new public library learning center initiative; and $5 million for foster care improvement.
At the city's request, the bill also changes the city's reserve requirement from 7 to 6 percent. This change frees up additional resources, provides the city with more flexibility in balancing its budget, and does so without impacting the city's favorable bond rating.
As I noted earlier, the District has accomplished much, but still more needs to be done. We are particularly troubled by some of the more intractable problems facing the District that seem to revolve around its children. If this bill has a theme, it is to continue to make sure to help the children of the District of Columbia. To help address this issue, this bill also includes $5 million for the recently established foster care improvement program, additional money for family literacy, and $6 million for the new library/learning center initiative subject to a 1-to-1 match by the District.
Over the past year, we visited many of the city's schools, and I can tell my colleagues from personal observation
there is a real need to improve student and teacher performance. In these visits, I was struck by the very poor physical condition of some of the District's schools and by the lack of resources available to students, especially in their school libraries. This is a new initiative, and it is designed to enhance and restore District of Columbia elementary school libraries as fully functioning learning centers and, in doing so, bring together local, Federal, and potentially private resources. This initiative, when implemented, will enhance our ability to provide critical educational resources the city's children deserve in order to receive a quality education.
This bill also fully funds the school improvement program authorized last year. This bill maintains the three-pronged commitment made last year to both the District schools, the District of Columbia charter schools, and $14 million for opportunity scholarships for students in underachieving schools. This three-pronged approach is designed to improve academic performance, while promoting school choice and more potential parent involvement.
Mr. Chairman, this bill also retains the general provisions from last year's bill, which are the same as the President's request.
Mr. Chairman, I believe it is important to move this bill through the appropriations process as quickly as possible so as to allow the District to spend its own funds to operate the programs and projects in the bill at the beginning of the fiscal year in October.
Let me personally thank the gentlewoman from the District of Columbia (Ms. Norton) for her comments earlier in the day during the debate on the D.C. rule. She is an incredible leader of this city, and it has been a pleasure to work with her. I do appreciate her cooperation by not offering an amendment, because I know in her heart she continues to be a principal advocate on behalf of the city, and I am grateful for her support and her action in that regard.
To summarize, Mr. Chairman, the bill we have before us is a fiscally responsible, balanced bill that deserves bipartisan support. It was not done alone. The gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Fattah) and I count on some key people. I would like to thank them for helping to put this bill together. The subcommittee led by our clerk, Joel Kaplan, Martha Foley, and Clelia Alvarado for their professional work on the bill. I also want to thank Nancy Fox from my staff and Michelle Anderson-Lee from the gentleman from Pennsylvania's (Mr. Fattah) staff for their hard work.
At this point I will include for the Record a table detailing the various accounts included in the bill.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TH20JY04.001
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TH20JY04.002
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TH20JY04.003
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Tom Davis), the distinguished chairman of the Committee on Government Reform.
(Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Cunningham), a distinguished member of the committee, who is vice chairman of the committee and has served on the committee for 10 years.
Mr. Chairman, I have no further requests for time, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, will the gentleman yield?
Yes, it is. I wanted to thank my distinguished colleague for bringing this issue to my attention. Let me say from the onset that I am very sympathetic to the gentleman's position on the issue. It is my understanding that the Committee on Government Reform has a 30-day review period in which to approve or disapprove all legislative provisions enacted by the city council.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
Let me say, Mr. Chairman, I have watched the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Hefley) stand on an appropriations bill, and I know his heart is in the right place; and, reluctantly, I do rise in opposition to his amendment.
The entire Federal portion of the bill is only $560 million. Within this total, the committee had to make some hard funding choices. It reduced a number of things that are key priorities to the Members of Congress and to the city's leadership. An additional 1 percent reduction in this bill would, I think, seriously hinder the District's ability to effectively manage its program at a time when the District government is sincerely making major improvements to its financial and program management.
I will not go through any examples, but I do rise in opposition. I understand where his heart is.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.