Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time. I rise in strong support of this bill, which is the result of laborious and painstaking bipartisan negotiations between our committee and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and…
Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time.
I rise in strong support of this bill, which is the result of laborious and painstaking bipartisan negotiations between our committee and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation in the other body.
This bill tries to strike a delicate balance between the need to give a new industry a chance to develop brand-new technology and the desire to provide enough regulation to protect the industry's customers.
We think we have struck that balance and here is why. First, the bill gives the Federal Aviation Administration clear authority for the first time to regulate the commercial human space flight industry.
Second, the bill gives the FAA unlimited authority to regulate the industry and its rockets to make sure they do no harm to third parties, that is, people on the ground or in the air who are in no way involved with the flight.
Third, the bill sets a clear timetable for when FAA will have unlimited authority to regulate the industry and its rockets to make sure they do no harm to the people on board.
But here is what the bill does not do. It does not allow the FAA right now to guess whether some new untested rocket technology will do harm to the people onboard. Why? Because this industry is at the stage when it is the preserve of visionaries and daredevils and adventurers. These are people who will fly at their own risk to try out new technologies. These are people who do not expect and should not expect to be protected by the government. Such protection would only stifle innovation.
So instead of allowing FAA guesswork for the next several years, the bill requires that anyone participating in launch, whether it is crew or passenger, must be notified of all risk of flight and must be told explicitly that the government has not certified the vehicle as safe for crew or passengers. And the FAA can come in and prohibit rocket designs and operational procedures that have already been shown to fail.
Now, obviously, this Wild West or barnstorming or infant industry state of affairs cannot obtain forever, if the commercial space flight industry is to become more than an expensive and risky novelty. Safety must increase, and gradually the industry will start to look more like a common carrier. And that is why the bill allows FAA after 8 years to regulate commercial space flight in pretty much the same way it regulates the airline industry. But it seems to me kind of silly to regulate Burt Rutan's vehicle, which has flown three times, as if it was a Boeing 747. If we regulate it that way, then his craft will never evolve into the equivalent of a 747.
So we have a balanced bill that will enable the commercial space flight industry to experiment, and that will encourage the industry to constantly improve its record of safety, so that within a relatively short time, its technology will mature and customer base will grow to the point that more regulation is warranted.
I want to thank our outgoing subcommittee chairman, the gentleman from California (Mr. Rohrabacher), for keeping after all of us on this bill. He has been tenacious. I also want to salute the distinguished gentleman from Texas (Mr. Lampson) for his leadership and perseverance. I want to thank also the chairman of our other committee, the gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young) of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for discharging this bill.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to support this sensible, balanced bill which will facilitate the development of a new industry that will expand the horizons of all Americans.
House of Representatives, Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure,
Washington, DC, November 18, 2004.
Hon. Sherwood L. Boehlert,
Chairman, Committee on Science, Rayburn Building, Washington,
Mr. Speaker, let me remind my colleagues that the House passed earlier this year, by a vote of 402 to 1, an earlier version of this bill that gave the FAA less regulatory authority over commercial human space flight than does the bill before us today. Without this bill, the FAA will continue to license private space flights without adequate authority to protect either the safety of the public or the finances of the government. Please support H.R. 5382, just as you voted for the initial version back in March.
Today's bill is the equivalent of a conference report, as it reflects bipartisan negotiations within this body and with the other body. This is good legislation; let us move it forward. Let us not stifle it. Let us not take the position of the equivalent of not letting the Wright Brothers test their ideas without first convincing Federal officials that nothing could go wrong.