Waiving Points Of Order Against Conference Report On H.R. 6, Energy Policy Act Of 2003
Mr. Speaker, I want to congratulate the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Tauzin) on, I think, a very good bill, controversial but weaving a lot of disparate sections together. I thank him and the others for the hard work and determined effort…
Mr. Speaker, I want to congratulate the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Tauzin) on, I think, a very good bill, controversial but weaving a lot of disparate sections together. I thank him and the others for the hard work and determined effort that went into the completion of this conference report.
I want to point out two sections in particular under my committee's jurisdiction which demonstrate the value we have gotten in adding flexibility to government contracting. First, we have the energy savings performance contracts that we make permanent in this legislation. Energy savings performance contracts, ESPCs, allow agencies to contract with energy service companies to upgrade and retrofit existing Federal buildings with modern, energy-efficient equipment. The agencies pay for this upgrade using the energy savings generated by the upgrade themselves.
These contract mechanisms enable the Federal agencies to improve energy efficiency of their facilities without depending on annual congressional appropriations for capital improvements. From 1988 to 2000, agencies using ESPCs to leverage an estimated $795 million in private sector financing for
energy improvements in Federal buildings, resulted in a 20-percent savings. This legislation makes ESPCs permanent.
I also want to describe a new acquisition authority granted in this legislation. This is the authority granted by the Department of Energy to engage in what are called Other Transactions in certain circumstances. Other Transactions, OTs, are contractual arrangements that support research and development without using standard procurement contract grants or cooperative agreements. They have been used successfully in the Department of Defense for a number of years.
Firms who are understandably hesitant to conduct research for the government because of government patent rules, accounting practices, and business requirements are willing to consider working with us under these arrangements. Some companies that have tried to work with the government under normal procurement rules have found it impossible to remain competitive in the private sector and contract under standard government restrictions and rules.
It is time to recognize the government needs the best, the most innovative research available. We need to become increasingly self- reliant in the energy field. We need to engage inventive firms that have until now refused to do business with the Federal Government because of arcane and inflexible standards.
This new flexibility is a major step toward harnessing the magic of America's research and development center in our quest for energy independence. I urge an ``aye'' on the rule and an ``aye'' on the bill.